IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aii/ijcmss/v11y2020i2p01-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of occupational stress and remote working on psychological well-being of employees: an empirical analysis during covid-19 pandemic concerning information technology industry in hyderabad

Author

Listed:
  • KDV Prasad

    (International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Telangana, Hyderabad, India.)

  • Rajesh W. Vaidya

    (Assistant Professor, Faculty In-charge Training and Placement, (DMT), Shri Ramdeobaba College of Engineering and Management, Ramdeo Tekdi, Gittikhadan, Katol Road, Nagpur, India.)

  • Mruthyanjaya Rao Mangipudi

    (Karvy Stock Broking Limited, Financial District, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, India.)

Abstract

Purpose: In the aftermath of national lockdown due to Covid-19, several organizations were forced to opt remote working, which provides several challenges and opportunities to the employees and employer. The reason for carrying out this empirical study is that the subject is new, challenging, and occupational stress exists everywhere; also, an inadequate research has been reported on such type of studies. This empirical study reports the results of the effect of occupational stress and remote working on employees’ psychological well-being in the Information Technology industry. Methodology: The effect of seven independent occupational stress-causing factors including workload, peer, physiological factors, role ambiguity, organization climate, psychological factors and job satisfaction, and an independent factor, remote working, on the dependent factor of psychological well-being of employees in Information Technology industry was measured. The psychological well-being was measured with six subscales – environment mastery, positive growth, positive relations, self-acceptance, autonomy, and purpose of life. The independent factors were measured using a survey instrument, a structured undisguised questionnaire, whereas dependent factors were measured with a shortened version of 18-item Ryff’s scale. The inferences of the outcome were made using appropriate statistical procedures. Findings: The multiple regression analysis results revealed independent factors like peer, role ambiguity, organization climate, and job satisfaction are significantly influencing the psychological well-being of the employees in the Information Technology Industry. There are minor statistically significant gender and age group differences that are affecting the psychological well-being of employees as observed. Implications:The study implies that wherever possible, the remote working options need to be worked out by the employer, in all the sectors to reduce the stress and enhance the psychological well-being of employees. Originality: Till now, no researcher has reported such type of empirical study, and the available literature is limited to occupational stress in general, without suggesting how remote working affects the psychological well-being of employees in particular.

Suggested Citation

  • KDV Prasad & Rajesh W. Vaidya & Mruthyanjaya Rao Mangipudi, 2020. "Effect of occupational stress and remote working on psychological well-being of employees: an empirical analysis during covid-19 pandemic concerning information technology industry in hyderabad," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 11(2), pages 01-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:aii:ijcmss:v:11:y:2020:i:2:p:01-13
    DOI: 10.18843/ijcms/v11i2/01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://scholarshub.net/index.php/ijcms/article/view/515/499
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://scholarshub.net/index.php/ijcms/article/view/515
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18843/ijcms/v11i2/01?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Loreta Tobia & Pierpaolo Vittorini & Giulia Di Battista & Simona D’Onofrio & Giada Mastrangeli & Pietro Di Benedetto & Leila Fabiani, 2024. "Study on Psychological Stress Perceived among Employees in an Italian University during Mandatory and Voluntary Remote Working during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(4), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Nor Lelawati Jamaludin & Sakinah Ahmad Kamal, 2023. "The Relationship between Remote Work and Job Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Perceived Autonomy," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 15(3), pages 10-22.
    3. Carlo Drago & Luisa Errichiello, 2024. "Remote Work admist the Covid-19 outbreak: Insights from an Ensemble Community-Based Keyword Network Analysis," Working Papers 2024.05, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    4. Dumitru Miron & Monica Aureliana Petcu & Maria Iulia David-Sobolevschi & Radu Cezar Cojocariu, 2021. "A Muldimensional Approach of the Relationship Between Teleworking and Employees Well-Being – Romania During the Pandemic Generated by the Sars-Cov-2 Virus," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(58), pages 586-586, August.
    5. Emanuela Mari & Giulia Lausi & Angelo Fraschetti & Alessandra Pizzo & Michela Baldi & Alessandro Quaglieri & Jessica Burrai & Benedetta Barchielli & Francesco Avallone & Anna Maria Giannini, 2021. "Teaching during the Pandemic: A Comparison in Psychological Wellbeing among Smart Working Professions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, April.
    6. Agnieszka Krugielka & Grazyna Bartkowiak & Sebastian Dama, 2021. "Functioning of Academic Teachers in the Conditions of the COVID-19 Epidemy in Poland in 2020 (Qualitative Test on the Basis of Self-Assessment)," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 5), pages 269-287.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aii:ijcmss:v:11:y:2020:i:2:p:01-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mr. Asif Anjum (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.