IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aii/ijcmss/v07y2016i2p64-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Determining Profitability in Indian Automobile Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Dharmaraj Arumugam

    (Associate Professor, Department of Management Studies & Research, Karpagam University (Karpagam Academy of Higher Education), Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India.)

  • Ashok Kumar M

    (Professor and Head, Department of Management Studies & Research, Karpagam University (Karpagam Academy of Higher Education), Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India.)

  • Preetha R

    (Assistant Professor, Department of Management Studies & Research, Karpagam University (Karpagam Academy of Higher Education), Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India.)

Abstract

Automobile sector has emerged as a sunrise sector. In April-March 2015, overall automobile exports grew by 14.89 percent over the same period last year. Passenger Vehicles, Commercial Vehicles, Three Wheelers and Two Wheelers grew by 4.42 percent, 11.33 percent, 15.44 percent and 17.93 percent respectively during April-March 2015 over the same period last year(SIAM). The leading local firms have established over 200 technical cooperation agreements with foreign firms to be able to reach international standards in cost and manufacturing. The healthy development and rapid growth of this industry has always been very important for the Indian economy. This paper aims to measure the profitability and also to analyze the effects of various factors on the profitability in Indian Automobile industry. For this purpose 16 companies were taken and 21 variables were analyzed through multiple correlation analysis and step wise multiple regression. It is proved that profitability of the Indian Automobile Industry is highly dependent on Operating Ratio and it contributes 93.40 per cent to variation in Return on Sales.

Suggested Citation

  • Dharmaraj Arumugam & Ashok Kumar M & Preetha R, 2016. "Factors Determining Profitability in Indian Automobile Industry," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 7(2), pages 64-69, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:aii:ijcmss:v:07:y:2016:i:2:p:64-69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://scholarshub.net/index.php/ijcms/article/view/174/168
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://scholarshub.net/index.php/ijcms/article/view/174
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anonymous, 1991. "The Automobile Industry," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 65(4), pages 1-1, January.
    2. Swati Modi, 2012. "A Study on the Adequacy and Efficacy of Working Capital in Automobile Industry in India," The IUP Journal of Accounting Research and Audit Practices, IUP Publications, vol. 0(2), pages 69-90, April.
    3. R. N. Agarwal, 1991. "Profitability and Growth in Indian Automobile Manufacturing Industry," Indian Economic Review, Department of Economics, Delhi School of Economics, vol. 26(1), pages 81-97, January.
    4. Giulio Bottazzi & Angelo Secchi & Federico Tamagni, 2008. "Productivity, profitability and financial performance," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 17(4), pages 711-751, August.
    5. Saranga, Haritha, 2009. "The Indian auto component industry - Estimation of operational efficiency and its determinants using DEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 707-718, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katrak, Homi, 2002. "Does economic liberalisation endanger indigenous technological developments?: An analysis of the Indian experience," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 19-30, January.
    2. Alperovych, Yan & Hübner, Georges & Lobet, Fabrice, 2015. "How does governmental versus private venture capital backing affect a firm's efficiency? Evidence from Belgium," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 508-525.
    3. Angelo Secchi & Federico Tamagni & Chiara Tomasi, 2016. "Financial constraints and firm exports: accounting for heterogeneity, self-selection, and endogeneity," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 25(5), pages 813-827.
    4. Ruigrok, Winfried & Tate, John J, 1995. "Public Testing And Research Centers In Japan," UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, Working Paper Series qt3581k5pd, UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, UC Berkeley.
    5. Segarra, Agustí & Teruel, Mercedes, 2012. "An appraisal of firm size distribution: Does sample size matter?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 314-328.
    6. Susan Helper & Mari Sako, 2010. "Management innovation in supply chain: appreciating Chandler in the twenty-first century," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 19(2), pages 399-429, April.
    7. repec:dgr:rugsom:97b05 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. A Lagendijk & G A van der Knaap, 1993. "Foreign Involvement in the Spanish Automobile Industry: Internalising versus Networking," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 25(11), pages 1663-1676, November.
    9. Gábor Péli & Bart Nooteboom, 1997. "Simulation of Learning in Supply Partnerships," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 43-66, March.
    10. repec:dgr:rugsom:95b39 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Coad, Alex & Segarra, Agustí & Teruel, Mercedes, 2013. "Like milk or wine: Does firm performance improve with age?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 173-189.
    12. Fabio Campanini & Serena Costa & Paolo Rizzi, 2013. "The Machine Tool Industry in Italy: Industrial Innovations and Performances," DISCE - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali dises1391, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    13. Maria Rosário Moreira & Rui Alves, 2006. "How far from Just-in-time are Portuguese firms? A survey of its progress and perception," FEP Working Papers 215, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    14. Hakan Yilmazkuday, 2011. "Oil Shocks through International Transport Costs: Evidence from U.S. Business Cycles," Working Papers 1105, Florida International University, Department of Economics.
    15. Henderson, Rebecca., 1994. "The evolution of integrative capability : innovation in cardiovascular drug discovery," Working papers 3711-94., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    16. Sang-Lyul Ryu & Jayoun Won, 2022. "The Value Relevance of Operational Innovation: Insights from the Perspective of Firm Life Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    17. Alex Coad, 2007. "Exploring the "mechanics" of firm growth: evidence from a short-panel VAR," Post-Print halshs-00175048, HAL.
    18. Alaa Alden Al Mohamed & Sobhi Al Mohamed, 2023. "Application of fuzzy group decision-making selecting green supplier: a case study of the manufacture of natural laurel soap," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Angelo Secchi & Federico Tamagni & Chiara Tomasi, 2016. "Export price adjustments under financial constraints," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(3), pages 1057-1085, August.
    20. Paolo G. Garella & Martin Peitz, 2000. "Intermediation Can Replace Certification," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, March.
    21. Lohwasser, Todor S., 2020. "Meta-analyzing the relative performance of venture capital-backed firms," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 4/2020, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.
    22. Marco Grazzi & Chiara Piccardo & Cecilia Vergari, 2020. "Concordance and complementarity in IP instruments," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(7), pages 756-788, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aii:ijcmss:v:07:y:2016:i:2:p:64-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mr. Asif Anjum (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.