IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aic/jopafl/y2014v5p214-229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legislative Study On The Government Regulation On Some Economic Recovery Measures

Author

Listed:
  • Ionel BOSTAN

    (Stefan cel Mare University, ionel_bostan@yahoo.com, Suceava, Romania)

Abstract

This paper addresses the most significant elements related to the direct enactment by the executive authority � following the most difficult moments of the financial crisis (2009-2010) � of some key measures in determining the economic recovery/growth. Special attention is given to the problem of growth strengthening and sustainable competitiveness of small and medium enterprises, as well as to the issue of stimulating the set up and development of micro enterprises by junior entrepreneurs. Considering things from the legal perspective, we also stop upon the legislative measures taken by the Government to support SME access to financial guarantees and credits. Obviously, in the context following the peak of the financial crisis, we took into consideration the regulation on stimulating the development of new jobs and the regime of state aids, as well. This latter issue includes, we believe, the most important references to State aid schemes on stimulating the investments with a major impact in the economy, the �de minimis� aid for the investments made by small and medium-sized enterprises, and also to the issues arising from the implementation of a State aid scheme to support the investments which promote the regional development by creating jobs.

Suggested Citation

  • Ionel BOSTAN, 2014. "Legislative Study On The Government Regulation On Some Economic Recovery Measures," Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 5(5), pages 214-229, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:aic:jopafl:y:2014:v:5:p:214-229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jopafl.com/uploads/issue5/LEGISLATIVE_STUDY_ON_THE_GOVERNMENT_REGULATION_ON_SOME_ECONOMIC_RECOVERY_MEASURES.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ionel BOSTAN, 2014. "Legislative Mobilization In Convergent Directions: Anti-Crisis And Pro-Sustainable Development," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 6(4), pages 18-28, December.
    2. Liviu-George, Maha & Dragos-Florentin, Mariciuc, 2009. "Characteristics of the financial crisis in 2008 and its implications on Romanian economy," MPRA Paper 27180, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Adserà, Alícia & Boix, Carles, 2002. "Trade, Democracy, and the Size of the Public Sector: The Political Underpinnings of Openness," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 56(2), pages 229-262, April.
    4. Joseph J. Spengler, 1949. "Laissez Faire and Intervention: A Potential Source of Historical Error," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 57(5), pages 438-438.
    5. STOICA Ovidiu & CAPRARU Bogdan, 2012. "The Current International Financial Crisis And The Financial Supervision Institutional Arrangements Effectiveness In The European Union Countries," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(4), pages 590-597.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gaga Loghin & Gabor Andrei & Naaji Antonela & Popescu Marius Constantin, 2016. "Analysis of the Evolution of SMEs in Western Romania Between 2011–2014, Using the Mathematical Modelling," Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Sciendo, vol. 26(4), pages 94-107, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ionel BOSTAN, 2014. "Dimensions Of The Aspect Of Ï¿½Legislative Authority� Of The Executive Branch," Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 6(6), pages 247-254, December.
    2. Simona-Gabriela MAŞCA, 2011. "The State and the Economy – Theoretical Aspects and Empirical Evidence for the EU," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(5(558)), pages 17-44, May.
    3. Bostan Ionel, 2014. "Juridical Tools of Governmental Nature Used to Mitigate Various Difficulties of the Financial and Budgetary System," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 61(2), pages 133-148, December.
    4. Ionel BOSTAN, 2016. "Considerations On Insufficient Legal Regulation Of Special Allocations Made By The Central Executive Authority," Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 9(9), pages 119-124, June.
    5. Christopher Hartwell, 2022. "Institutions and trade‐related inequality," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 3246-3264, July.
    6. Kono Daniel Y., 2011. "Insuring Free Trade: Unemployment Insurance and Trade Policy," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(3), pages 1-31, October.
    7. Kevin Williams, 2021. "Does national income mediate the relationship between trade and government size?," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 61(6), pages 3029-3057, December.
    8. Peter Zweifel & Ilja Neustadt, 2013. "Why Does Income Redistribution Differ Between Countries? Comparative Evidence From Germany and Switzerland," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 11(3), pages 39-47, October.
    9. Rangan Gupta & Lardo Stander & Andrea Vaona, 2023. "Openness and growth: Is the relationship non‐linear?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 3071-3099, July.
    10. Axel Dreher, 2003. "The Influence of Globalization on Taxes and Social Policy – an Empirical Analysis for OECD Countries," Public Economics 0310002, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 02 Jan 2005.
    11. Muhammad Zakaria & Samreen Shakoor, 2011. "Relationship Between Government Size and Trade Openness: Evidence from Pakistan," Transition Studies Review, Springer;Central Eastern European University Network (CEEUN), vol. 18(2), pages 328-341, December.
    12. Alena Kimakova, 2009. "Government size and openness revisited: the case of financial globalization," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(3), pages 394-406, August.
    13. Marques II, Israel, 2018. "Firms and social policy preferences under weak institutions : Evidence from Russia," BOFIT Discussion Papers 7/2018, Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition.
    14. Federico Podestà, 2016. "Do Big Governments Promote Trade Liberalization? A Long-Term Analysis of 18 OECD Countries, 1975-2000," FBK-IRVAPP Working Papers 2016-02, Research Institute for the Evaluation of Public Policies (IRVAPP), Bruno Kessler Foundation.
    15. Margaret Levi & Audrey Sacks, 2009. "Legitimating beliefs: Sources and indicators," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(4), pages 311-333, December.
    16. Weinberg, Joe, 2018. "Where’s the Pork?: The Political Economy of the US Farm Bill," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 273867, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Saima Nawaz & Idrees Khawaja, 2020. "The Impact of Political Regime and Institutions on Government Size in Middle-Income Countries," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 59(2), pages 199-220.
    18. Vikas Dixit, 2014. "Relation between Trade Openness, Capital Openness and Government Size in India," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 49(1), pages 1-29, February.
    19. Art Durnev & Ruben Enikolopov & Maria Petrova & Veronica Santarosa, 2012. "Politics, instability, and international investment flows," Working Papers w0190, Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR).
    20. repec:zbw:bofitp:2018_007 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Peter Zweifel & Ilja Neustadt, 2013. "Why Does Income Redistribution Differ Between Countries? Comparative Evidence From Germany and Switzerland," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 11(03), pages 39-47, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aic:jopafl:y:2014:v:5:p:214-229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sireteanu Napoleon-Alexandru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feaicro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.