IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ahd/journl/v5y2024i9p49-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Nexus of Quality of the e-Tax System, Taxpayers’ Attitude, Multiple Mediators, and Tax Compliance Behaviour: A Theoretical Paper

Author

Listed:
  • Faustine Juma MASUNGA

    (Economics, Accounting and Finance Department, National Institute of Transport, Tanzania)

Abstract

Several works of the extant literature have explored tax compliance behaviour. Some studies investigated factors that have a positive effect on tax compliance behaviour. In contrast, some studies use individual theories, and other empirical studies focus on institutional theories to explain tax compliance behaviour. Moreover, some literature has opined that tax compliance behaviour is based on economic factors, while other studies have expounded on social factors. Yet there is a tiny debate regarding the probability of amalgamating both the quality of the e-tax system and attitude towards the e-tax system using multiple mediators to explain tax compliance behaviour. This paper advances the model suggesting that tax compliance behaviour is the result of the interplay of the quality of the e-tax system (employing the IS Success Model) and the attitude towards the e-tax system (arraying the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behaviour). We suggest that both the quality of the e-tax system and the attitude towards the e-tax system are considerable constructs in expounding on tax compliance behaviour through multiple mediators (user satisfaction and behavioural intention).

Suggested Citation

  • Faustine Juma MASUNGA, 2024. "The Nexus of Quality of the e-Tax System, Taxpayers’ Attitude, Multiple Mediators, and Tax Compliance Behaviour: A Theoretical Paper," CECCAR Business Review, Body of Expert and Licensed Accountants of Romania (CECCAR), vol. 5(9), pages 49-64, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ahd:journl:v:5:y:2024:i:9:p:49-64
    DOI: 10.37945/cbr.2024.09.06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ceccarbusinessreview.ro/the-nexus-of-quality-of-the-e-tax-system-taxpayers-attitude-multiple-mediators-and-tax-compliance-behaviour-a-theoretical-paper-a421d/download-PDF/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.ceccarbusinessreview.ro/the-nexus-of-quality-of-the-e-tax-system-taxpayers-attitude-multiple-mediators-and-tax-compliance-behaviour-a-theoretical-paper-a421a/abstract/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.37945/cbr.2024.09.06?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sutirtha Bagchi & Libor Dušek, 2021. "Third-party Reporting and Tax Collections: Evidence from the Introduction of Withholding of the State Personal Income Tax," Villanova School of Business Department of Economics and Statistics Working Paper Series 50, Villanova School of Business Department of Economics and Statistics.
    2. repec:eme:marpps:10222529200600001 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:bla:kyklos:v:48:y:1995:i:1:p:3-18 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Shirish C. Srivastava & Thompson S.H. Teo, 2008. "The Relationship between E-Government and National Competitiveness: The Moderating Influence of Environmental Factors," Post-Print hal-00465277, HAL.
    5. Finn, Adam, 2011. "Investigating the non-linear effects of e-service quality dimensions on customer satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 27-37.
    6. Arun Rai & Sandra S. Lang & Robert B. Welker, 2002. "Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 50-69, March.
    7. Sadress Night & Juma Bananuka, 2019. "The mediating role of adoption of an electronic tax system in the relationship between attitude towards electronic tax system and tax compliance," Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(49), pages 73-88, April.
    8. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    9. James Alm & Isabel Sanchez & Ana DE Juan, 1995. "Economic and Noneconomic Factors in Tax Compliance," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Syed Kashif Raza Zaidi & Cassy Daniels Henderson & Gaurav Gupta, 2017. "The moderating effect of culture on e-filing taxes: evidence from India," Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(1), pages 134-152, February.
    11. Sven Laumer & Christian Maier & Tim Weitzel, 2017. "Information quality, user satisfaction, and the manifestation of workarounds: a qualitative and quantitative study of enterprise content management system users," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 333-360, July.
    12. Allingham, Michael G. & Sandmo, Agnar, 1972. "Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(3-4), pages 323-338, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benno Torgler & Friedrich Schneider, 2005. "What Shapes the Attitudes Towards Paying Taxes? Evidence from Switzerland, Belgium and Spain," CREMA Working Paper Series 2005-06, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    2. Colin C. Williams, 2023. "A Modern Guide to the Informal Economy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 18668.
    3. Fábio Pereira Silva & Reinaldo Guerreiro & Eduardo Flores, 2019. "Voluntary versus enforced tax compliance: the slippery slope framework in the Brazilian context," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 66(2), pages 147-180, June.
    4. Benno Torgler & Friedrich Schneider, 2007. "What Shapes Attitudes Toward Paying Taxes? Evidence from Multicultural European Countries," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 88(2), pages 443-470, June.
    5. Friedrich Heinemann & Martin Kocher, 2013. "Tax compliance under tax regime changes," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 20(2), pages 225-246, April.
    6. Elsa Pedroso & Carlos F. Gomes, 2024. "Discerning interrelationships among management accounting systems, organizational variables, and managerial performance," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(9), pages 1-27, September.
    7. Williams Colin C, 2019. "Explaining and tackling the informal economy: an evaluation of competing perspectives," Open Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 63-75, January.
    8. Jason DeBacker & Bradley T. Heim & Anh Tran & Alexander Yuskavage, 2015. "Legal Enforcement and Corporate Behavior: An Analysis of Tax Aggressiveness after an Audit," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 58(2), pages 291-324.
    9. Fochmann, Martin & Wolf, Nadja, 2019. "Framing and salience effects in tax evasion decisions – An experiment on underreporting and overdeducting," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 260-277.
    10. Casal, Sandro & Mittone, Luigi, 2016. "Social esteem versus social stigma: The role of anonymity in an income reporting game," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 55-66.
    11. Dossè Mawussi Djahini‐Afawoubo, 2024. "Understanding tax payment behaviour in the West African Economic and Monetary Union: The role of perceived detection capacity and honesty," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 795-823, March.
    12. Fortin, Bernard & Lacroix, Guy & Villeval, Marie-Claire, 2007. "Tax evasion and social interactions," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(11-12), pages 2089-2112, December.
    13. Fochmann, Martin & Wolf, Nadja, 2015. "Mental accounting in tax evasion decisions: An experiment on underreporting and overdeducting," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 186, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    14. Kastlunger, Barbara & Lozza, Edoardo & Kirchler, Erich & Schabmann, Alfred, 2013. "Powerful authorities and trusting citizens: The Slippery Slope Framework and tax compliance in Italy," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 36-45.
    15. Savaya, Riki & Monnickendam, Menachem & Waysman, Mark, 2006. "Extent and type of worker utilization of an integrated information system in a human services agency," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 209-216, August.
    16. Matthew D. Rablen, 2010. "Tax Evasion and Exchange Equity: A Reference-Dependent Approach," Public Finance Review, , vol. 38(3), pages 282-305, May.
    17. Semjén, András, 2017. "Az adózói magatartás különféle magyarázatai [Various explanations for tax compliance]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 140-184.
    18. Iskandar, Deden Dinar & Wuenscher, Tobias & Badhuri, Anik, 2012. "The Determinants of Compliance on Environmental Tax: The Insights of Theoretical and Experimental Approaches Motivated by the Case of Indonesia," 86th Annual Conference, April 16-18, 2012, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 134977, Agricultural Economics Society.
    19. Udo, Godwin J. & Bagchi, Kallol K. & Kirs, Peeter J., 2010. "An assessment of customers’ e-service quality perception, satisfaction and intention," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 481-492.
    20. Gerxhani, Klarita & Schram, Arthur, 2006. "Tax evasion and income source: A comparative experimental study," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 402-422, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    system quality; information system success model; theory of planned behaviour; technology acceptance model; tax compliance behaviour;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
    • H26 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Tax Evasion and Avoidance
    • H3 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents
    • H87 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - International Fiscal Issues; International Public Goods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ahd:journl:v:5:y:2024:i:9:p:49-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Radu CIOBANU (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.