IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ahd/journl/v5y2024i9p49-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Nexus of Quality of the e-Tax System, Taxpayers’ Attitude, Multiple Mediators, and Tax Compliance Behaviour: A Theoretical Paper

Author

Listed:
  • Faustine Juma MASUNGA

    (Economics, Accounting and Finance Department, National Institute of Transport, Tanzania)

Abstract

Several works of the extant literature have explored tax compliance behaviour. Some studies investigated factors that have a positive effect on tax compliance behaviour. In contrast, some studies use individual theories, and other empirical studies focus on institutional theories to explain tax compliance behaviour. Moreover, some literature has opined that tax compliance behaviour is based on economic factors, while other studies have expounded on social factors. Yet there is a tiny debate regarding the probability of amalgamating both the quality of the e-tax system and attitude towards the e-tax system using multiple mediators to explain tax compliance behaviour. This paper advances the model suggesting that tax compliance behaviour is the result of the interplay of the quality of the e-tax system (employing the IS Success Model) and the attitude towards the e-tax system (arraying the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behaviour). We suggest that both the quality of the e-tax system and the attitude towards the e-tax system are considerable constructs in expounding on tax compliance behaviour through multiple mediators (user satisfaction and behavioural intention).

Suggested Citation

  • Faustine Juma MASUNGA, 2024. "The Nexus of Quality of the e-Tax System, Taxpayers’ Attitude, Multiple Mediators, and Tax Compliance Behaviour: A Theoretical Paper," CECCAR Business Review, Body of Expert and Licensed Accountants of Romania (CECCAR), vol. 5(9), pages 49-64, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ahd:journl:v:5:y:2024:i:9:p:49-64
    DOI: 10.37945/cbr.2024.09.06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ceccarbusinessreview.ro/the-nexus-of-quality-of-the-e-tax-system-taxpayers-attitude-multiple-mediators-and-tax-compliance-behaviour-a-theoretical-paper-a421d/download-PDF/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.ceccarbusinessreview.ro/the-nexus-of-quality-of-the-e-tax-system-taxpayers-attitude-multiple-mediators-and-tax-compliance-behaviour-a-theoretical-paper-a421a/abstract/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.37945/cbr.2024.09.06?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sutirtha Bagchi & Libor Dušek, 2021. "Third-party Reporting and Tax Collections: Evidence from the Introduction of Withholding of the State Personal Income Tax," Villanova School of Business Department of Economics and Statistics Working Paper Series 50, Villanova School of Business Department of Economics and Statistics.
    2. Arun Rai & Sandra S. Lang & Robert B. Welker, 2002. "Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 50-69, March.
    3. Syed Kashif Raza Zaidi & Cassy Daniels Henderson & Gaurav Gupta, 2017. "The moderating effect of culture on e-filing taxes: evidence from India," Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(1), pages 134-152, February.
    4. Allingham, Michael G. & Sandmo, Agnar, 1972. "Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(3-4), pages 323-338, November.
    5. repec:eme:marpps:10222529200600001 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Shirish C. Srivastava & Thompson S.H. Teo, 2008. "The Relationship between E-Government and National Competitiveness: The Moderating Influence of Environmental Factors," Post-Print hal-00465277, HAL.
    7. Finn, Adam, 2011. "Investigating the non-linear effects of e-service quality dimensions on customer satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 27-37.
    8. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    9. repec:bla:kyklos:v:48:y:1995:i:1:p:3-18 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Sadress Night & Juma Bananuka, 2019. "The mediating role of adoption of an electronic tax system in the relationship between attitude towards electronic tax system and tax compliance," Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(49), pages 73-88, April.
    11. James Alm & Isabel Sanchez & Ana DE Juan, 1995. "Economic and Noneconomic Factors in Tax Compliance," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Sven Laumer & Christian Maier & Tim Weitzel, 2017. "Information quality, user satisfaction, and the manifestation of workarounds: a qualitative and quantitative study of enterprise content management system users," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 333-360, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Colin C. Williams, 2023. "A Modern Guide to the Informal Economy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 18668.
    2. Fábio Pereira Silva & Reinaldo Guerreiro & Eduardo Flores, 2019. "Voluntary versus enforced tax compliance: the slippery slope framework in the Brazilian context," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 66(2), pages 147-180, June.
    3. Friedrich Heinemann & Martin Kocher, 2013. "Tax compliance under tax regime changes," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 20(2), pages 225-246, April.
    4. Dossè Mawussi Djahini‐Afawoubo, 2024. "Understanding tax payment behaviour in the West African Economic and Monetary Union: The role of perceived detection capacity and honesty," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 795-823, March.
    5. Kastlunger, Barbara & Lozza, Edoardo & Kirchler, Erich & Schabmann, Alfred, 2013. "Powerful authorities and trusting citizens: The Slippery Slope Framework and tax compliance in Italy," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 36-45.
    6. Casal, Sandro & Mittone, Luigi, 2016. "Social esteem versus social stigma: The role of anonymity in an income reporting game," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 55-66.
    7. Semjén, András, 2017. "Az adózói magatartás különféle magyarázatai [Various explanations for tax compliance]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 140-184.
    8. Fortin, Bernard & Lacroix, Guy & Villeval, Marie-Claire, 2007. "Tax evasion and social interactions," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(11-12), pages 2089-2112, December.
    9. Kalina Koleva, 2005. "Seeking for an optimal tax administration: the efficiency costs’ approach [A la recherche de l'administration fiscale optimale : l'approche par les coûts d'efficience]," Post-Print halshs-00195354, HAL.
    10. Amedeo Piolatto & Matthew D. Rablen, 2017. "Prospect theory and tax evasion: a reconsideration of the Yitzhaki puzzle," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 82(4), pages 543-565, April.
    11. James Alm & Antoine Malézieux, 2021. "40 years of tax evasion games: a meta-analysis," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(3), pages 699-750, September.
    12. Kalina Koleva, 2005. "A la recherche de l'administration fiscale optimale : l'approche par les coûts d'efficience," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques r05050, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    13. Xin Xu & Viswanath Venkatesh & Kar Yan Tam & Se-Joon Hong, 2010. "Model of Migration and Use of Platforms: Role of Hierarchy, Current Generation, and Complementarities in Consumer Settings," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(8), pages 1304-1323, August.
    14. Sharath Sasidharan & Radhika Santhanam & Daniel J. Brass & Vallabh Sambamurthy, 2012. "The Effects of Social Network Structure on Enterprise Systems Success: A Longitudinal Multilevel Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3-part-1), pages 658-678, September.
    15. Towfiqul Islam Khan & Muntaseer Kamal & Faiyaz Talukdar, 2019. "Potential of Personal Income Tax in Bangladesh: An Examination of Survey Data," CPD Working Paper 126, Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD).
    16. Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Michael D. Williams & Vishanth Weerakkody, 2015. "Investigating success of an e-government initiative: Validation of an integrated IS success model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 127-142, February.
    17. Masclet, David & Montmarquette, Claude & Viennot-Briot, Nathalie, 2019. "Can whistleblower programs reduce tax evasion? Experimental evidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    18. James E. Prieger, 2023. "Tax noncompliance: The role of tax morale in smokers' behavior," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 41(4), pages 653-673, October.
    19. Edgardo Bravo Orellana, 2015. "Automating and Informating: Roles to Examine in Technology’s Impact on Performance," Working Papers 15-17, Centro de Investigación, Universidad del Pacífico.
    20. Rainald Borck, 2009. "Voting on redistribution with tax evasion," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 32(3), pages 439-454, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    system quality; information system success model; theory of planned behaviour; technology acceptance model; tax compliance behaviour;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
    • H26 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Tax Evasion and Avoidance
    • H3 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents
    • H87 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - International Fiscal Issues; International Public Goods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ahd:journl:v:5:y:2024:i:9:p:49-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Radu CIOBANU (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.