IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/wjagec/32429.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use Of Extraneous Information With An Econometric Model To Evaluate Impacts Of Pesticide Withdrawals

Author

Listed:
  • Taylor, C. Robert
  • Lacewell, Ronald D.
  • Talpaz, Hovav

Abstract

A framework for combining extraneous information with an econometric model to evaluate the economic impacts of pesticide withdrawals is presented in this paper. The extraneous information, which can be a best guess or experimental data, is used to shift an econometrically estimated supply function. The full sectoral econometric model is then simulated through time with and without the supply shift to estimate the relative impacts of withdrawing the pesticide. The theoretical framework is applied to the withdrawal of all insecticides used on cotton.

Suggested Citation

  • Taylor, C. Robert & Lacewell, Ronald D. & Talpaz, Hovav, 1979. "Use Of Extraneous Information With An Econometric Model To Evaluate Impacts Of Pesticide Withdrawals," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 4(1), pages 1-8, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:wjagec:32429
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.32429
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/32429/files/04010001.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.32429?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evans, Sam & Bell, Thomas M., 1978. "How Cotton Acreage, Yield, And Production Respond To Price Changes," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 30(2), pages 1-6, April.
    2. Taylor, C. Robert & Lacewell, Ronald D., 1977. "Boll Weevil Control Strategies: Regional Benefits And Costs," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, July.
    3. C. Robert Taylor & Klaus K. Frohberg, 1977. "The Welfare Effects of Erosion Controls, Banning Pesticides, and Limiting Fertilizer Application in the Corn Belt," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 59(1), pages 25-36.
    4. Taylor, C. Robert & Lacewell, Ronald D., 1977. "Boll Weevil Control Strategies: Regional Benefits and Costs," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(1), pages 129-135, July.
    5. Casey, Jim & Lacewell, Ronald D., 1973. "Estimated Impact of Withdrawing Specified Pecticides from Cotton Production," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(1), pages 153-159, July.
    6. Casey, James E. & Lacewell, Ronald D., 1973. "Estimated Impact Of Withdrawing Specified Pesticides From Cotton Production," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 5(1), pages 1-7, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Taylor, C. Robert, 1989. "Stochastic Simulation of the Aggregate Impacts of Agricultural Policy and Technological Change," 1989 Quantifying Long Run Agricultural Risks and Evaluating Farmer Responses to Risk Meeting, April 9-12, 1989, Sanibel Island, Florida 271527, Regional Research Projects > S-232: Quantifying Long Run Agricultural Risks and Evaluating Farmer Responses to Risk.
    2. Whittaker, Gerald W. & Lin, Biing-Hwan & Vasavada, Utpal, 1995. "Restricting Pesticide Use: The Impact On Profitability By Farm Size," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Lynch, Lori & Carpenter, Janet, 2001. "The Impacts Of Allocation Strategies For Spatially Regulated Chemical Use," Working Papers 28576, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    4. Fox, Glenn & Weersink, Alfons & Sarwar, Ghulam & Duff, Scott & Deen, Bill, 1991. "Comparative Economics Of Alternative Agricultural Production Systems: A Review," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fox, Glenn & Weersink, Alfons & Sarwar, Ghulam & Duff, Scott & Deen, Bill, 1991. "Comparative Economics Of Alternative Agricultural Production Systems: A Review," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Archibald, Sandra O. & McCorkle, Chester O. Jr & Howitt, Richard E., 1986. "A Dynamic Analysis Of Production Externalities : Pesticide Resistance In California Cotton," Working Papers 225802, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    3. Lacewell, Ronald D. & McGrann, James M., 1982. "Research And Extension Issues In Production Economics," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, July.
    4. Pagoulatos, Angelos & Timmons, John F., 1977. "Alternative Scenarios Of Energy Use In U.S. Crop Production," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 9(2), pages 1-8, December.
    5. Phillips, Mark & Hueth, Darrell L. & Just, Richard E., 1989. "Estimating Cost of Banning Agricultural Chemicals: The Case of Maneb and Maneb Alternatives," Working Papers 197631, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    6. Ribaudo, Marc O. & Heimlich, Ralph & Claassen, Roger & Peters, Mark, 2001. "Least-cost management of nonpoint source pollution: source reduction versus interception strategies for controlling nitrogen loss in the Mississippi Basin," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 183-197, May.
    7. Tolhurst, Tor N. & DeMars, Christopher & Klonsky, Karen & Goodhue, Rachael E. & Zhang, Minghua, 2017. "Are Farmers Good Neighbors? Self-Regulation of Pesticide Applications near Schools and Daycares in California," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258393, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Park, William M. & Sawyer, David G., 1987. "Cost Effectiveness Of Alternative Subsidy Strategies For Soil Erosion Control," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(2), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Carriker, Gordon L., 1993. "Factor Input Demand Subject to Economic and Environmental Risk: The Case of Nitrogen Fertilizer in Corn Production," Staff Papers 118154, Kansas State University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    10. Whittaker, Gerald W. & Lin, Biing-Hwan & Vasavada, Utpal, 1995. "Restricting Pesticide Use: The Impact On Profitability By Farm Size," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-11, December.
    11. Lakshminarayan, P. G., 1993. "Tradeoffs in balancing multiple objectives of an integrated agricultural economic and environmental system," ISU General Staff Papers 1993010108000011833, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    12. Kerestes, Daniel E. & Easter, K. William, 1981. "A Review And An Annotated Bibliography Of Studies Of Soil Conservation Programs, Practices And Strategies," Staff Papers 13988, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    13. Collins, Keith J. & Evans, Robert B. & Barry, Robert D., 1979. "World Cotton Production and Use: Projections for 1985 and 1990," Foreign Agricultural Economic Report (FAER) 146889, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    14. Archer, David Walter, 1995. "Self-insurance and self-protection in weed control: implications for nonpoint source pollution," ISU General Staff Papers 1995010108000012033, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    15. Musser, Wesley N. & Tew, Bernard V. & Epperson, James E., 1981. "An Economic Examination Of An Integrated Pest Management Production System With A Contrast Between E-V And Stochastic Dominance Analysis," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 13(1), pages 1-6, July.
    16. Musser, Wesley N., 1979. "Discussion: Non-Point Source Pollution Abatement—Potential Impact and Research Needs," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 11-15, December.
    17. Walker, David John & Timmons, John F., 1980. "In Search Of The Best Solution For Non -Point Pollution: Effluent Taxes Or Cost-Share Subsidies?," 1980 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 278890, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    18. Shortle, James S., 1984. "The Use Of Estimated Pollution Flows In Agricultural Pollution Control Policy: Implications For Abatement And Policy Instruments," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 13(2), pages 1-9, October.
    19. Young, Douglas L. & Walker, David J. & Kanjo, Paul L., 1989. "Farmer and Taxpayer Cost Effectiveness of the 1985 Conservation Provisions," WAEA/ WFEA Conference Archive (1929-1995) 244956, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    20. Matekole, Augustus N. & Westra, John V., 2009. "Economic Analysis of Tillage and Nutrient Best Management Practices in the Ouachita River Basin, Louisiana," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49519, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:wjagec:32429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/waeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.