IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/wjagec/32380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Efficiency Vs. Distributive Equity: Blm'S Use Of Economic Analysis In Fact And Fiction

Author

Listed:
  • Loomis, John B.

Abstract

In a recent paper in this Journal entitled "Economic Efficiency vs. Distributive Equity: The Sagebrush Rebellion" Obermiller provides misleading evidence about the role of efficiency criterion in land use allocations by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). In using this "evidence" he comes to conclusions that miss other important economic explanations for the so-called Sagebrush Rebellion. A reader unfamiliar with the actual economic analyses performed by BLM might be led to believe that the field offices' active use of efficiency as a decision criterion to implement the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) is one explanation of the origin of the Sagebrush Rebellion. Evidence is presented herein that shows little or none of the efficiency analyses implied by an economists' reading of FLPMA and BLM's Planning Regulations (Department of Interior, 1979) have ever been implemented, let alone used by area and district managers to make decisions. Rather, arguments are presented that show it is generally not in these managers' self interest to place emphasis on efficiency. An alternative explanation of the source of the Sagebrush Rebellion is presented that relies on the notion of property rights.

Suggested Citation

  • Loomis, John B., 1984. "Economic Efficiency Vs. Distributive Equity: Blm'S Use Of Economic Analysis In Fact And Fiction," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:wjagec:32380
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.32380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/32380/files/09010207.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.32380?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McConnell, Kenneth E., 1979. "Values Of Marine Recreational Fishing Measurement And Impact Of Measurement," 1979 Annual Meeting, July 29-August 1, Pullman, Washington 278310, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Kenneth E. McConnell, 1979. "Values of Marine Recreational Fishing: Measurement and Impact of Measurement," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 61(5), pages 921-925.
    3. Obermiller, Frederick W., 1982. "Economic Efficiency Vs. Distributive Equity: The "Sagebrush Rebellion"," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 7(2), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Harberger, Arnold C, 1971. "Three Basic Postulates for Applied Welfare Economics: An Interpretive Essay," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 9(3), pages 785-797, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soliman, Adam, 2014. "Using individual transferable quotas (ITQs) to achieve social policy objectives: A proposed intervention," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 76-81.
    2. Pang, Arwin, 2017. "Incorporating the effect of successfully bagging big game into recreational hunting: An examination of deer, moose and elk hunting," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 12-17.
    3. Anderson, Lee G. & Parsons, George R., 2004. "Review of Valuation Studies for Coastal and Ocean Resources in Latin America and the Caribbean," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 4486, Inter-American Development Bank.
    4. Asafu-Adjaye, J. & Boxall, P.C., 1989. "An Economic Assesment of the Value of Wildlife Resourves in Alberta," Project Report Series 232071, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    5. Samples, Karl C. & Bishop, Richard C., 1980. "Estimating Social Values of Sport Caught Fish: A Suggested Approach," 1980 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 278980, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Vuuren, W. van & Ketchabaw, E. H., 1994. "A Hedonic Study of Agricultural Land Rent in Southwestern Ontario," Department of Agricultural Economics and Business 258777, University of Guelph.
    7. Barnett, William A. & Erwin Diewert, W. & Zellner, Arnold, 2011. "Introduction to measurement with theory," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 161(1), pages 1-5, March.
    8. Graham,Errol George & Tchale,Hardwick & Ndione,Mamadou, 2020. "An Optimal Rice Policy for Sierra Leone : Balancing Consumer and Producer Welfare," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9369, The World Bank.
    9. Evan F. Koenig, 1985. "Indirect Methods for Regulating Externalities Under Uncertainty," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 100(2), pages 479-493.
    10. Russell Pittman, 2007. "Consumer Surplus as the Appropriate Standard for Antitrust Enforcement," EAG Discussions Papers 200709, Department of Justice, Antitrust Division.
    11. Kooten, G. Cornelis van, 2013. "Modeling Forest Trade in Logs and Lumber: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis," Working Papers 149182, University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy.
    12. Stephen Martin, 2019. "The Potential Compensation Principle and Constant Marginal Utility of Income," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 70(3), pages 383-393, September.
    13. Udo Ebert, 1986. "Equity and distribution in cost-benefit analysis," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 67-78, December.
    14. Kevin Boyle & Sapna Kaul & Ali Hashemi & Xiaoshu Li, 2015. "Applicability of benefit transfers for evaluation of homeland security counterterrorism measures," Chapters, in: Carol Mansfield & V. K. Smith (ed.), Benefit–Cost Analyses for Security Policies, chapter 10, pages 225-253, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Heckman, James, 2001. "Accounting for Heterogeneity, Diversity and General Equilibrium in Evaluating Social Programmes," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 111(475), pages 654-699, November.
    16. Jeffrey T. LaFrance, 1990. "Incomplete Demand Systems And Semilogarithmic Demand Models," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 34(2), pages 118-131, August.
    17. Kym Anderson & Johan Swinnen, 2008. "Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in Europe's Transition Economies," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6502.
    18. Martin, Will, 2021. "Tools for measuring the full impacts of agricultural interventions," IFPRI-MCC technical papers 2, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    19. Huang, Kaixing & Yan, Wenshou & Huang, Jikun, 2020. "Agricultural subsidies retard urbanisation in China," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(04), January.
    20. Abdou, Dr. Dyaa K., 1982. "Government Distribution and Price Policies for Major Subsidized food Commodities in Egypt: An Overview," Working Papers 232845, University of California, Davis, Agricultural Development Systems: Egypt Project.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Land Economics/Use;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:wjagec:32380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/waeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.