IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/weecfo/273676.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fiscal gridlock over the budget in Washington state: The politics and economics of pouring exempt wells into the prior appropriations bucket

Author

Listed:
  • Yoder, Jonathon

Abstract

Washington State has been in fiscal gridlock because a recent court case – the Hirst Decision (Hirst)--- would require counties to show legal availability of groundwater to issue permits for new rural residential wells that would be in connectivity with surface water. Many argued that this requirement would halt rural residential development in the state. This article examines the context and potential consequences of Hirst through an economic lens. For context, the characteristics of exempt wells and recent legal precursors are discussed. A qualitative assessment of the likely impacts of Hirst and the conditions that might alleviate its effects is provided, followed by potential institutional innovations that may emerge because of or in response to Hirst. These developments in Washington State illustrate some of the complexities of exempt wells common to many of the Western United States.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoder, Jonathon, 2018. "Fiscal gridlock over the budget in Washington state: The politics and economics of pouring exempt wells into the prior appropriations bucket," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 16(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:weecfo:273676
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.273676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/273676/files/5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.273676?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jedidiah Brewer & Robert Glennon & Alan Ker & Gary D. Libecap, 2007. "Water Markets in the West: Prices, Trading, and Contractual Forms," NBER Working Papers 13002, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Ronald C. Griffin & Shih-Hsun Hsu, 1993. "The Potential for Water Market Efficiency When Instream Flows Have Value," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 75(2), pages 292-303.
    3. Yoo, James & Simonit, Silvio & Connors, John P. & Maliszewski, Paul J. & Kinzig, Ann P. & Perrings, Charles, 2013. "The value of agricultural water rights in agricultural properties in the path of development," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 57-68.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johannus Janmaat, 2011. "Water Markets, Licenses, and Conservation: Some Implications," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 87(1), pages 145-159.
    2. Sheila M. Olmstead, 2010. "The Economics of Managing Scarce Water Resources," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 4(2), pages 179-198, Summer.
    3. Ansink, Erik & Weikard, Hans-Peter, 2009. "Contested water rights," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 247-260, June.
    4. Changhai Qin & Shan Jiang & Yong Zhao & Yongnan Zhu & Qingming Wang & Lizhen Wang & Junlin Qu & Ming Wang, 2022. "Research on Water Rights Trading and Pricing Model between Agriculture and Energy Development in Ningxia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Gilmour, J.K. & Letcher, R.A. & Jakeman, A.J., 2005. "Analysis of an integrated model for assessing land and water policy options," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 57-77.
    6. Kukal, M.S. & Irmak, S., 2020. "Impact of irrigation on interannual variability in United States agricultural productivity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    7. Choumert, Johanna & Phélinas, Pascale, 2014. "A Hedonic Analysis Of Agricultural Land Values In A Gm Soybean Area Of Argentina," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182750, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Gonzalo Edwards & Oscar Cristi & Carlos Díaz, 2012. "The Effect of Regulation Uncertainty on Water-Right Prices: The Case of the Loa Basin in the Antofagasta Region of Chile," Documentos de Trabajo 421, Instituto de Economia. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile..
    9. James J. Murphy & Ariel Dinar & Richard E. Howitt & Erin Mastrangelo & Stephen J. Rassenti & Vernon L. Smith, 2006. "Mechanisms for Addressing Third-Party Impacts Resulting From Voluntary Water Transfers," Chapters, in: John A. List (ed.), Using Experimental Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Yoo, James & Simonit, Silvio & Connors, John P. & Maliszewski, Paul J. & Kinzig, Ann P. & Perrings, Charles, 2013. "The value of agricultural water rights in agricultural properties in the path of development," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 57-68.
    11. James H. Skurray & Ram Pandit & David J. Pannell, 2013. "Institutional impediments to groundwater trading: the case of the Gnangara groundwater system of Western Australia," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(7), pages 1046-1072, September.
    12. Ereney Hadjigeorgalis, 2009. "A Place for Water Markets: Performance and Challenges," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 31(1), pages 50-67.
    13. Nith, Kosal & Ly, Singhong, 2018. "Reinvigorating Cambodian agriculture: Transforming from extensive to intensive agriculture," MPRA Paper 93086, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 23 Dec 2018.
    14. Scheierling, Susanne M., 2011. "Assessing the direct economic effects of reallocating irrigation water to alternative uses : concepts and an application," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5797, The World Bank.
    15. Wang, Y.B. & Liu, D. & Cao, X.C. & Yang, Z.Y. & Song, J.F. & Chen, D.Y. & Sun, S.K., 2017. "Agricultural water rights trading and virtual water export compensation coupling model: A case study of an irrigation district in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 180(PA), pages 99-106.
    16. Edwards, Eric C. & Cristi, Oscar & Edwards, Gonzalo & Libecap, Gary D., 2018. "An illiquid market in the desert: estimating the cost of water trade restrictions in northern Chile," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(6), pages 615-634, December.
    17. Grafton, R. Quentin & Landry, Clay & Libecap, Gary D. & O’Brien, R.J. (Bob), 2009. "Water Markets and Scarcity: Australia’s Murray Darling Basin and the US Southwest," Research Reports 94943, Australian National University, Environmental Economics Research Hub.
    18. Turner, Brenda & Perry, Gregory M., 1997. "Agriculture To Instream Water Transfers Under Uncertain Water Availability: A Case Study Of The Deschutes River, Oregon," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(2), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Janmaat, Johannus A., 2007. "Stakeholder Engagement in Land Development Decisions: A Waste of Effort?," MPRA Paper 6147, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. R. Quentin Grafton & Clay Landry & Gary D. Libecap & Sam McGlennon & Bob O’Brien, 2010. "An Integrated Assessment of Water Markets: Australia, Chile, China, South Africa and the USA," ICER Working Papers 32-2010, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:weecfo:273676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/waeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.