IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/uersra/289740.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Net Migration in the Great Plains Increasingly Linked to Natural Amenities and Suburbanization

Author

Listed:
  • Cromartie, John B.

Abstract

Over 90 percent of counties in the Great Plains experienced an upward trend in net migration from the mid-1980’s to the mid- 1990’s, in the form of lower net outmigration, higher net inmigration, or a switch from out- to inmigration. Net outmigration persisted in sparsely settled, isolated areas and in areas where jobs depended on the extraction of energy resources. However, migration in the mid-1990’s was associated less with rural-urban location and employment and more with increased commuting from suburban fringe counties and movement to the few areas in the region with high natural amenities.

Suggested Citation

  • Cromartie, John B., 1998. "Net Migration in the Great Plains Increasingly Linked to Natural Amenities and Suburbanization," Rural America/ Rural Development Perspectives, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 13(1), February.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersra:289740
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.289740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/289740/files/RDP298e.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.289740?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:rre:publsh:v:37:y:2007:i:3:p:303-43 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Anil Rupasingha & Yongzheng Liu & Mark Partridge, 2015. "Rural Bound: Determinants of Metro to Non-Metro Migration in the United States," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 97(3), pages 680-700.
    3. Katherine White, 2008. "Sending or Receiving Stations? The Dual Influence of Railroads in Early 20th-Century Great Plains Settlement," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 27(1), pages 89-115, February.
    4. Marre, Alexander W. & Rupasingha, Anil, 2017. "School Quality and Rural In-Migration: Can Improving the Quality of Rural Schools Attract New Residents?," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 259134, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Dan S. Rickman & Shane D. Rickman, 2011. "Population Growth In High‐Amenity Nonmetropolitan Areas: What'S The Prognosis?," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 863-879, December.
    6. Katherine Curtis White, 2008. "Population change and farm dependence: Temporal and spatial variation in the U.S. great plains, 1900–2000," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 45(2), pages 363-386, May.
    7. Alexander W. Marré & Anil Rupasingha, 2020. "School quality and rural in‐migration: Can better rural schools attract new residents?," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 156-173, January.
    8. Arthur P. Hall & Scott Moody & Wendy P. Warcholik, 2009. "The County-to-County Migration of Taxpayers and Their Incomes, 1995-2006," Technical Reports 090306, Brandmeyer Center for Applied Economics, School of Business, University of Kansas.
    9. John Cromartie & David Nulph & Gary Hart & Elizabeth Dobis, 2013. "Defining frontier areas in the United States," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 149-153, June.
    10. Adamson, Dwight W. & Waugh, Andrew, 2012. "Farm Operator Entry and Exit Behavior: A Longitudinal Analysis," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124053, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Community/Rural/Urban Development;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersra:289740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.