IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/uersja/139032.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Partial Adoption of Divisible Technologies in Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Szmedra, Philip I.
  • Wetzstein, Michael E.
  • McClendon, Ronald W.

Abstract

We have developed a dynamic theoretical model to investigate technology complements where the degree of adoption is a function of producers' prior technology levels. Based on this model, we used an empirical application to assess the adoption of integrated pest management (IPM) with and without irrigation. Results indicate that the degree of new technology adoption may depend on the extent of the risk. For example, strongly risk-averse producers who use dryland technology may only partially adopt IPM. And producers who irrigate to significantly decrease variation in yield and returns may also only partially adopt IPM.

Suggested Citation

  • Szmedra, Philip I. & Wetzstein, Michael E. & McClendon, Ronald W., 1990. "Partial Adoption of Divisible Technologies in Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 42(3), pages 1-7.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersja:139032
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.139032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/139032/files/4Szmedra_42_3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.139032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meyer, Jack, 1977. "Second Degree Stochastic Dominance with Respect to a Function," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 18(2), pages 477-487, June.
    2. Prabhu L. Pingali & Gerald A. Carlson, 1985. "Human Capital, Adjustments in Subjective Probabilities, and the Demand for Pest Controls," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 67(4), pages 853-861.
    3. Derek Byerlee & Edith Hesse de Polanco, 1986. "Farmers' Stepwise Adoption of Technological Packages: Evidence from the Mexican Altiplano," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 68(3), pages 519-527.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anderson, Jock R., 1993. "The Economics of New Technology Adaptation and Adoption," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 61(02-2), pages 1-9, August.
    2. Dillon, Carl R. & Shearer, Scott A. & Mueller, Thomas, 2001. "A Mixed Integer, Nonlinear Programming Model Of Innovative Variable Rate Planting Date With Polymer Seed Coatings," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20572, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Kanakasabai, Murali & Dillon, Carl R., 2004. "Potential For Farm Adaptation To Global Climatic Change In Kentucky," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20422, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David J. Pannell, 1991. "Pests and pesticides, risk and risk aversion," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 5(4), pages 361-383, August.
    2. Szmedre, Philip I. & Wetzstein, Michael E. & McClendon, Ronald W., 1988. "Production Decision licking in an Adaptive Mode," 1988 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Knoxville, Tennessee 270189, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Mazvimavi, Kizito & Twomlow, Steve, 2009. "Socioeconomic and institutional factors influencing adoption of conservation farming by vulnerable households in Zimbabwe," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 101(1-2), pages 20-29, June.
    4. Parsch, Lucas D. & Loewer, Otto J., 1986. "Risk-Efficiency of Beef-Forage Rotational Grazing Under Weather Uncertainty," 1986 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Reno, Nevada 278411, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Lichtenberg, Erik & Zilberman, David & Archibald, Sandra O., 1990. "Economics and Pesticides," Working Papers 197750, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    6. Pavel Anselmo Alvarez Carrillo & Lucia Reis Peixoto Roselli & Eduarda Asfora Frej & Adiel Teixeira Almeida, 2022. "Selecting an agricultural technology package based on the flexible and interactive tradeoff method," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 314(2), pages 377-392, July.
    7. Lichtenberg, Erik & Pingali, Prabhu L. & Spear, Robert C., 1991. "Productivity and Environmental Trade-Offs of Pesticide Regulation," Working Papers 197775, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    8. Hardaker, J. B., 1982. "Fundamental Aspects Of Risk And Uncertainty In Agriculture," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 21(2), October.
    9. Grabowski, Philip P. & Kerr, John M. & Haggblade, Steven & Kabwe, Stephen, 2014. "Determinants of Adoption of Minimum Tillage by Cotton Farmers in Eastern Zambia," Food Security Collaborative Working Papers 188567, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    10. Ramírez, Octavio A. & Shultz, Steven D., 2000. "Poisson Count Models to Explain the Adoption of Agricultural and Natural Resource Management Technologies by Small Farmers in Central American Countries," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(1), pages 21-33, April.
    11. V. Kerry Smith & William H. Desvousges, 1988. "Risk Perception, Learning, and Individual Behavior," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(5), pages 1113-1117.
    12. Raymond H. Chan & Ephraim Clark & Xu Guo & Wing-Keung Wong, 2020. "New development on the third-order stochastic dominance for risk-averse and risk-seeking investors with application in risk management," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(2), pages 108-132, June.
    13. Walker, Thomas S., 2000. "Reasonable expectations on the prospects for documenting the impact of agricultural research on poverty in ex-post case studies," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 515-530, August.
    14. Sheng Gong & Jason.S. Bergtold & Elizabeth Yeager, 2021. "Assessing the joint adoption and complementarity between in-field conservation practices of Kansas farmers," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, December.
    15. Zepeda, Lydia, 1989. "An Ex Ante Adoption Model Of Bovine Somatotropin By California Milk Producers," 1989 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 2, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 270659, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Hurley, Terrance M., 2010. "A review of agricultural production risk in the developing world," Working Papers 188476, HarvestChoice.
    17. Donald C., Rudow, 2005. "Preferences and Increased Risk Aversion under a General Framework of Stochastic Dominance," MPRA Paper 41191, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 07 Jun 2005.
    18. Lean, H.H. & McAleer, M.J. & Wong, W.-K., 2010. "Investor preferences for oil spot and futures based on mean-variance and stochastic dominance," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2010-37, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    19. Gale, H. Frederick, Jr., 1990. "Econometric Analysis Of Farmer Participation In The Dairy Termination Program In North Carolina And Virginia," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(1), pages 1-9, July.
    20. Caffey, Rex H. & Kazmierczak, Richard F., Jr., 1994. "Factors Influencing Technology Adoption In A Louisiana Aquaculture System," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 26(1), pages 1-11, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersja:139032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.