IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v67y1985i4p853-861..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human Capital, Adjustments in Subjective Probabilities, and the Demand for Pest Controls

Author

Listed:
  • Prabhu L. Pingali
  • Gerald A. Carlson

Abstract

In addition to risk aversion, farmer behavior in an uncertain environment is governed by subjective probability estimates of random events. The estimates given here lend support to the idea that human capital development can improve farmers' ability to estimate pest damage probabilities. More accurate assessment of subjective probabilities leads to lower pesticide use and increases the use of labor-intensive pest controls. The human capital variables with the largest effects are formal schooling and farmer experience, with smaller impacts from field scouting and extension schools.

Suggested Citation

  • Prabhu L. Pingali & Gerald A. Carlson, 1985. "Human Capital, Adjustments in Subjective Probabilities, and the Demand for Pest Controls," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 67(4), pages 853-861.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:67:y:1985:i:4:p:853-861.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1241826
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:67:y:1985:i:4:p:853-861.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.