IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/uersaw/302684.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

No-till and Strip-till Are Widely Adopted but Often Used in Rotation With Other Tillage Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Claassen, Roger

Abstract

Tillage prepares soil for planting, controls weeds, incorporates manure or fertilizer that has been spread on the soil surface, mixes crop residue into the soil, and encourages soil warming for early planting. In recent decades, however, farmers have steadily reduced tillage or eliminated its use altogether (no-till). This keeps crop residue on the soil surface, which helps reduce erosion and conserve soil moisture. Recent ERS research shows that roughly half of U.S. corn, cotton, soybean, and wheat producers used either no-till or strip-till at least once between 2012 and 2016. Twenty-one percent used no-till or strip-till every year during the same period.

Suggested Citation

  • Claassen, Roger, 2019. "No-till and Strip-till Are Widely Adopted but Often Used in Rotation With Other Tillage Practices," Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 0(02), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersaw:302684
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.302684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/302684/files/USDA%20ERS%20-%20No-till%20and%20Strip-till%20Are%20Widely%20Adopted%20but%20Often%20Used%20in%20Rotation%20With%20Other%20Tillage%20Practices.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.302684?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beetstra, Margaret A. & Wilson, Robyn S. & Doidge, Mary, 2022. "Conservation behavior over time: Examining a Midwestern farmer sample," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersaw:302684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.