IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/sojoae/29905.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk And Sustainable Agriculture: A Target-Motad Analysis Of The 92-Year "Old Rotation"

Author

Listed:
  • Novak, James L.
  • Mitchell, Charles C., Jr.
  • Crews, Jerry R.

Abstract

Target-MOTAD was used to assess the risks and returns of sustainable cotton crop rotations from Auburn University's 92-year "Old Rotation." Study results analyze rotations of continuous cotton, with and without winter legumes; two years of cotton-winter legumes-corn, with and without nitrogen fertilization; and three years of cotton-winter legumes-corn and rye-soybeans double-cropped. Ten years of observations on deviations from target income were used to identify optimal sustainable rotation(s). Study results suggest that diversification in rotations, as well as in crops, results in the least risk for a given level of target income.

Suggested Citation

  • Novak, James L. & Mitchell, Charles C., Jr. & Crews, Jerry R., 1990. "Risk And Sustainable Agriculture: A Target-Motad Analysis Of The 92-Year "Old Rotation"," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(1), pages 1-10, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:sojoae:29905
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.29905
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/29905/files/22010145.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.29905?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francis McCamley & James B. Kliebenstein, 1987. "Describing and Identifying the Complete Set of Target MOTAD Solutions," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(3), pages 669-676.
    2. William J. Brown, 1987. "A Risk Efficiency Analysis of Crop Rotations in Saskatchewan," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 35(2), pages 333-355, July.
    3. McCamley, F. P. & Kliebenstein, James, 1987. "Describing and Identifying the Complete Set of Target Motad Solutions," Staff General Research Papers Archive 10625, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maynard, Leigh J. & Harper, Jayson K. & Hoffman, Lynn D., 1997. "Impact Of Risk Preferences On Crop Rotation Choice," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 26(1), pages 1-9, April.
    2. Eihab Fathelrahman & Mohamed Gheblawi & Safdar Muhammad & Emily Dunn & James C. Ascough & Timothy R. Green, 2017. "Optimum Returns from Greenhouse Vegetables under Water Quality and Risk Constraints in the United Arab Emirates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-11, April.
    3. Gebremedhin, Berhanu & Schwab, Gerald, 1998. "The Economic Importance Of Crop Rotation Systems: Evidence From The Literature," Staff Paper Series 11690, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    4. Foster, Thomas H., 1991. "Farm Level Impacts Of Reduced Chemical Use On Southern Agriculture: Discussion," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(1), pages 1-3, July.
    5. Harris, Thomas R. & Seung, Chang K. & Narayanan, Rangesan, 2001. "Targeting Economic Diversification: An Application of Target MOTAD Procedures," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 31(2), pages 197-215, Fall.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vontalge, Alan L., 1991. "A feasibility study of swine producer management cooperatives," ISU General Staff Papers 1991010108000018168, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Kingwell, Ross, 1996. "Programming models of farm supply response: The impact of specification errors," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 307-324.
    3. McCamley, Francis P. & Rudel, Richard K., 1999. "Target Motad For Risk Lovers," 1999 Annual Meeting, July 11-14, 1999, Fargo, ND 35723, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    4. Pannell, David J. & Nordblom, Thomas L., 1998. "Impacts of risk aversion on whole-farm management in Syria," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 42(3), pages 1-21.
    5. Hardaker, J. Brian & Pandey, Sushil & Patten, Louise H., 1991. "Farm Planning under Uncertainty: A Review of Alternative Programming Models," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 59(01), pages 1-14, April.
    6. Kaaria, Susan Kawira, 1990. "Economic potential of high oil oats," ISU General Staff Papers 1990010108000017620, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    7. Tembo, Gelson & Kaitibie, Simeon & Epplin, Francis M., 1999. "Integrated Crop And Livestock Risk Modeling," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21505, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Thampapillai DJ. & Maleka, P. T. & Milimo, J. T., 1992. "Quantification of the trade-offs in Zambia between environment, employment, income and food-security," ILO Working Papers 992880613402676, International Labour Organization.
    9. Kliebenstein, James & McCamley, Francis, 1991. "Characteristics of the Set of Dual Solutions of the Target MOTAD Model," WAEA/ WFEA Conference Archive (1929-1995) 321424, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    10. Gregory L. Poe & Richard M. Klemme & Shawn J. McComb & John E. Ambrosious, 1991. "Commodity Programs and the Internalization of Erosion Costs: Do They Affect Crop Rotation Decisions?," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 13(2), pages 223-235.
    11. Gebremedhin, Berhanu & Schwab, Gerald & Harwood, Richard R. & Christenson, Donald & Bricker, Calvin, 1998. "A Stochastic Dominance Analysis Of Alternative Sugar Beet- And Navy Bean- Based Crop Rotations In Michigan," Staff Paper Series 11509, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    12. Maynard, Leigh J. & Harper, Jayson K. & Hoffman, Lynn D., 1997. "Impact Of Risk Preferences On Crop Rotation Choice," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 26(1), pages 1-9, April.
    13. Gebremedhin, Berhanu & Schwab, Gerald, 1998. "The Economic Importance Of Crop Rotation Systems: Evidence From The Literature," Staff Paper Series 11690, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    14. Perillat, B. J. & Brown, W. J. & Cohen, R. D. H., 2004. "A risk efficiency analysis of backgrounding and finishing steers on pasture in Saskatchewan, Canada," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 213-233, June.
    15. repec:ilo:ilowps:288061 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Risk and Uncertainty;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:sojoae:29905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.