IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/polvaa/262401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uwarunkowania uczestnic twa młodzieży wiejskiej w procesie innowacji społecznych

Author

Listed:
  • Zajda, Katarzyna

Abstract

Celem wdrażania innowacji społecznych jest niwelowanie istniejących proble- mów społecznych, w tym tych dotyczących grup dyskryminowanych, a do takich, jeśli cho- dzi o rynek pracy, należy współczesna młodzież. Celem rozważań w niniejszym artykule jest zwrócenie uwagi na potencjalne uwarunko wania uczestnictwa mło dzieży wiejskiej w pro- cesie innowacji społecznych. Przedmiotem analizy są wybrane składowe kapitału ludzkiego i społecznego cechującego młodzież, które m ogą być znaczące dla jej uczestnictwa w inno- wacjach społecznych. Zostaną zaprezentowane rezultaty badań socjologicznych (przepro- wadzonych z wykorzystaniem ankiety audytoryjnej) zrealizowanych w latach 2014–2015 na obszarze województwa wielkopolskiego wśród młodzieży w wieku 16–19 lat zamieszkującej obszary wiejskie. Młodzież ta uczęszczała do szkół ponadgimnazjalnych (zasadniczych szkół zawodowych, techników oraz liceów ogólnokształcących). Przeprowadzone analizy pozwo- liły wyróżnić wśród wybranych składowych kapitału ludzkiego i społecznego młodzieży te, które mogą negatywnie oddziaływać na j ej uczestnictwo w innowacjach społecznych. Zaliczono do nich, po pierwsze, niewielką wiedzę o innowacjach, w tym o innowacjach społecznych, szczególnie cenną dla przyszłych innowatorów społecznych (również tych, którzy naśladują dobre przykłady w tym zakresie) czy też pionierów akceptacji innowacji społecznych. Po drugie, niewielkie zainte resowanie sprawami lokalnymi ograniczające możliwość uczestnictwa młodzieży w innowacja ch społecznych wdrażanych przez pod- mioty lokalne. Po trzecie, ograniczenie ak tywności społecznej młodzieży do środowiska szkolnego, co stawia pod znakiem zapytania jej kontynuowanie po zakończeniu edukacji, a tym samym przynależność jakiejś części mło dzieży do sieci, w ramach których mogą być tworzone, wdrażane i przyswajane innowacje społeczne. ----- The aim of implementing social innovatio ns is to eliminate the existing social problems, including problems of groups that are discriminated against. Contemporary youths are definitely a group which is disfavoured on the labour market. The objective of this paper is to point out the potential determinants of rural youths’ participation in the process of social innovations. The analysis focuses on selected components of the participants’ human and social capital, which may be important for their participation in social innovations. The paper presents the results of sociological research (involving the auditorium survey technique) carried out in the period 2014–2015 in Wielkopolskie Voivodeship, among young people aged 16–19 residing in rural areas. The participants attended upper secondary schools (vocational schools, secondary technical schools and general secondary schools). The performed analyses led to the identification of components of youths’ human and social capital which may have a negative influence on their participation in social innovations. First, young people have little knowledge on innovations, including social innovations, whi le such knowledge is especially valuable for future social innovators (also those who follow good examples in this regard) or pioneers of adopting social innovations in local conditions. Secondly, young people display little interest in local matters, which limits the possibility of their participation in social innovations implemented by local entities. Thirdly, youths’ social activity is only limited to school environment, which means that after graduation they may not continue that activity and thus not belong to networks in which social innovations are developed, implemented and adopted.

Suggested Citation

  • Zajda, Katarzyna, 2016. "Uwarunkowania uczestnic twa młodzieży wiejskiej w procesie innowacji społecznych," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 3(172), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:polvaa:262401
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.262401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/262401/files/fd4fddaaf5dbcd46d99bd4162a31.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/262401/files/fd4fddaaf5dbcd46d99bd4162a31.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.262401?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cajaiba-Santana, Giovany, 2014. "Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 42-51.
    2. Geoff Mulgan, 2012. "Social Innovation Theories: Can Theory Catch Up with Practice?," Springer Books, in: Hans-Werner Franz & Josef Hochgerner & Jürgen Howaldt (ed.), Challenge Social Innovation, edition 127, pages 19-42, Springer.
    3. Stijn Oosterlynck & Yuri Kazepov & Andreas Novy & Pieter Cools & Eduardo Barberis & Florian Wukovitsch & Tatiana Saruis & Bernhard Leubolt, 2013. "The butterfly and the elephant: local social innovation, the welfare state and new poverty dynamics," ImPRovE Working Papers 13/03, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Susanna Ulinski, 2015. "Corporate Social Innovation as a Driver of Performance and Welfare. WWWforEurope Policy Paper No. 25," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58500, April.
    2. Thomas Hoppe & Gerdien De Vries, 2018. "Social Innovation and the Energy Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Petteri Repo & Kaisa Matschoss, 2019. "Social Innovation for Sustainability Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Baran Grzegorz, 2020. "Social Innovation Living Labs as Platforms to Co-design Social Innovations," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 36-57, March.
    5. Xie, Xiaoxia & Huang, Chien-Chung & Chen, Yafan & Hao, Feng, 2019. "Intelligent robots and rural children," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 283-290.
    6. Ghazinoory, Sepehr & Nasri, Shohreh & Ameri, Fatemeh & Montazer, Gholam Ali & Shayan, Ali, 2020. "Why do we need ‘Problem-oriented Innovation System (PIS)’ for solving macro-level societal problems?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    7. Torill Nyseth & Abdelillah Hamdouch, 2019. "The Transformative Power of Social Innovation in Urban Planning and Local Development," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 1-6.
    8. Bea Cantillon & Natascha Van Mechelen, 2013. "Poverty reduction and social security: Cracks in a policy paradigm," Working Papers 1304, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    9. Julia Maria Wittmayer & Tessa de Geus & Bonno Pel & F. Avelino & Sabine Hielscher & Thomas Hoppe & Marie Susan Mühlemeier & Agata Stasik & Sem Oxenaar & Karoline K.S. Rogge & Vivian Visser & Esther Ma, 2020. "Beyond instrumentalism: Broadening the understanding of social innovation in socio-technical energy systems," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/312323, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    10. Cristina Dalla Torre & Elisa Ravazzoli & Marijke Dijkshoorn-Dekker & Nico Polman & Mariana Melnykovych & Elena Pisani & Francesca Gori & Riccardo Da Re & Kamini Vicentini & Laura Secco, 2020. "The Role of Agency in the Emergence and Development of Social Innovations in Rural Areas. Analysis of Two Cases of Social Farming in Italy and The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-25, May.
    11. Ivana Živojinović & Alice Ludvig & Karl Hogl, 2019. "Social Innovation to Sustain Rural Communities: Overcoming Institutional Challenges in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-27, December.
    12. Tachia Chin & Yin Yang & Pei Zhang & Xiaofen Yu & Luying Cao, 2019. "Co-creation of Social Innovation: Corporate Universities as Innovative Strategies for Chinese Firms to Engage with Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, March.
    13. Kajikawa, Yuya & Mejia, Cristian & Wu, Mengjia & Zhang, Yi, 2022. "Academic landscape of Technological Forecasting and Social Change through citation network and topic analyses," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    14. Maarten Wolsink, 2020. "Framing in Renewable Energy Policies: A Glossary," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-31, June.
    15. Yuchul Jung, 2017. "A semantic annotation framework for scientific publications," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1009-1025, May.
    16. Mónica Ramos-Mejía & Alejandro Balanzo, 2018. "What It Takes to Lead Sustainability Transitions from the Bottom-Up: Strategic Interactions of Grassroots Ecopreneurs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    17. Laura Grattidge & Ha Hoang & Jonathan Mond & David Lees & Denis Visentin & Stuart Auckland, 2023. "Exploring Community-Based Suicide Prevention in the Context of Rural Australia: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Edwards-Schachter,Mónica & Wallace,Matthew, 2015. "âShaken, but not stirredâ: six decades defining social innovation," INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series 201504, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV).
    19. Matschoss, Kaisa & Mikkonen, Irmeli & Gynther, Lea & Koukoufikis, Giorgos & Uihlein, Andreas & Murauskaite-Bull, Ingrida, 2022. "Drawing policy insights from social innovation cases in the energy field," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    20. Attila Havas & Doris Schartinger & K. Matthias Weber, 2022. "Innovation Studies, Social Innovation, and Sustainability Transitions Research: From mutual ignorance towards an integrative perspective?," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 2227, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:polvaa:262401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/irwirpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.