IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/paaero/201805.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Imitation vs. Innovation in the SME Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Takács-György, Katalin
  • Toyserkani, Ahmad M.P.

Abstract

It is frequently mentioned that during economic crisis one of the key elements of strengthening SMEs is permanent renewal and capability of innovation. However, only some businesses are able to carry out classical product/service innovation (Schumpeter). We are of the opinion that observing the best practice, adoption and/or adaption – the imitation – should be given a higher function in everyday business life. From the point of view of business development, imitation can be more important than innovation. To find ideas worth imitating it is necessary to react and start to produce rapidly, at the right time and bring to the market the essentials of imitation. The aim of the paper is to give a theoretical overview of the interpretations of innovation and imitation. Sectoral features and regional differences determine the scope of development and renewal for existing enterprises. At the same time the knowledge of entrepreneurs regarding innovation is insufficient, thus a new paradigm is needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Takács-György, Katalin & Toyserkani, Ahmad M.P., 2014. "Imitation vs. Innovation in the SME Sector," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2014(2).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:paaero:201805
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.201805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/201805/files/16-2-Takacs-Gyorgi.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.201805?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Segerstrom, Paul S, 1991. "Innovation, Imitation, and Economic Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(4), pages 807-827, August.
    2. Lee, Sungjoo & Park, Gwangman & Yoon, Byungun & Park, Jinwoo, 2010. "Open innovation in SMEs--An intermediated network model," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 290-300, March.
    3. Dries, Liesbeth & Pascucci, Stefano & Török, Áron & Tóth, József, 2014. "Keeping Your Secrets Public? Open Versus Closed Innovation Processes in the Hungarian Wine Sector," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 17(1), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Fenyvesi, Laszlo & Erdeine Kesmarki-Gally, Szilvia, 2012. "Boosting the competitiveness of agricultural production in Hungary through an innovation system," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 114(2), pages 1-5, October.
    5. Owen, Wyn & Williams, Eirwen, 2012. "The utilisation of groups for innovation and knowledge transfer," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 114(2), pages 1-7, October.
    6. Klinger, Bailey & Lederman, Daniel, 2006. "Diversification, innovation, and imitation inside the Global Technological Frontier," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3872, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Judit OLÁH & Tamás HARMAN & József POPP, 2018. "Optimal Distribution Between Box And Pallet Automatic Warehouse Storage," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 17, pages 199-210, September.
    2. Daniel Juravle & Edina Erdei & Gyorgy Kossa & Sándor Kovacs & Jozsef Popp & Judit Olah, 2022. "Examining the Correlations Between Industry 4.0 Assets, External and Internal Risk Factors and Business Performance Among Hungarian Food Companies," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(59), pages 143-143.
    3. Judit OLÁH & Mónika HARANGI–RAKOS & József POPP, 2017. "Innovative Development Of Warehouse Technology," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 10, pages 107-116, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simona Alfiero & Laura Broccardo & Massimo Cane & Alfredo Esposito, 2018. "High Performance Through Innovation Process Management in SMEs. Evidence from the Italian wine sector," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(3), pages 87-110.
    2. Gregorio Gim�nez, 2011. "Imitations, economic activity and welfare," Documentos de Trabajo dt2011-03, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de Zaragoza.
    3. Emma L. Hitchen & Petra A. Nylund & Eric Viardot, 2017. "The Effectiveness Of Open Innovation: Do Size And Performance Of Open Innovation Groups Matter?," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(03), pages 1-24, April.
    4. Saini, Seema & Ahmad, Wasim, 2024. "Credit creation, credit destruction and credit reallocation: Firm-level evidence from India," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Jean Guinet & Dirk Meissner, 2012. "Open Innovation: Implications for Corporate Strategies, Government Policy and International R&D Spillovers," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 26-36.
    6. Mukoyama, Toshihiko, 2003. "Innovation, imitation, and growth with cumulative technology," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 361-380, March.
    7. Gupta, Himanshu & Barua, Mukesh Kumar, 2016. "Identifying enablers of technological innovation for Indian MSMEs using best–worst multi criteria decision making method," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 69-79.
    8. Anthony J. Evans, 2016. "The unintended consequences of easy money: How access to finance impedes entrepreneurship," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 29(3), pages 233-252, September.
    9. Andy Cosh & Xiaolan Fu & Alan Hughes, 2005. "Management characteristics, collaboration and innovative efficiency: evidence from UK survey data," Working Papers wp311, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    10. Dennis, Allen & Shepherd, Ben, 2007. "Trade costs, barriers to entry, and export diversification in developing countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4368, The World Bank.
    11. Mohamed MABROUKI, 2018. "What Kind Of Intellectual Propfrty Regime Is More Favorable To Innovation: With Or Without A Patent?," Journal of Smart Economic Growth, , vol. 3(1), pages 77-95, Juin.
    12. Julia DUBROVSKAYA & Elena KOZONOGOVA, 2020. "Modeling The Spatial Development Of The Economy On The Basis Of Perspective Interregional Cooperation And Specialization," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 1040-1052, November.
    13. Shankar Gimire & Kul Kapri & Md Rajib-Ur Rahman, 2018. "Imitate or Innovate? FDI, Technology, and Income Levels in Middle Income Countries," Journal of Development Innovations, KarmaQuest International, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, May.
    14. Lai, John & Olynk Widmar, Nicole J. & Gunderson, Michael A. & Widmar, David A. & Ortega, David L., 2018. "Prioritization of farm success factors by commercial farm managers," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(6), July.
    15. Adeleke Oladapo Banwo & Jianguo Du & Uchechi Onokala, 2017. "The determinants of location specific choice: small and medium-sized enterprises in developing countries," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17, December.
    16. José Moleiro Martins & Muhammad Farrukh Shahzad & Shuo Xu, 2023. "Factors influencing entrepreneurial intention to initiate new ventures: evidence from university students," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, December.
    17. Ricardo Hausmann & Bailey Klinger, 2007. "The Structure of the Product Space and the Evolution of Comparative Advantage," CID Working Papers 146, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    18. Sunil Kanwar & Robert Evenson, 2003. "Does intellectual property protection spur technological change?," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 55(2), pages 235-264, April.
    19. Margarida Bandeira Morais & Julia Swart & Jacob Arie Jordaan, 2021. "Economic Complexity and Inequality: Does Regional Productive Structure Affect Income Inequality in Brazilian States?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.
    20. Hailu, Degol & Kipgen, Chinpihoi, 2017. "The Extractives Dependence Index (EDI)," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 251-264.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:paaero:201805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seriaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.