IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ndjtrf/206968.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Measures for Transit Network Performance Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, Young‐Jae

Abstract

This paper discusses existing measures for the analysis of transit network performance and develops new measures that use a comparative approach to examine the efficiency of transit network configuration. Most measures in transit planning and operating are estimated by the transit system itself, but because transit competes with other transportation modes, comparative measures are necessary to attract more transit riders. This paper introduces two measures: the Degree of Competitiveness and the Degree of Circuity. While these measures examine performance for each zone-to-zone travel, simple average and weighted average are also introduced to evaluate the entire transit network.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Young‐Jae, 2008. "Comparative Measures for Transit Network Performance Analysis," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 47(3).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndjtrf:206968
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.206968
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/206968/files/2141-4196-1-PB.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.206968?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Jie & Levinson, David M., 2015. "Circuity in urban transit networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 145-153.
    2. Myeonghyeon Kim & Seung-Young Kho & Dong-Kyu Kim, 2019. "A Transit Route Network Design Problem Considering Equity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-16, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Public Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndjtrf:206968. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.trforum.org/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.