IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jrapmc/339977.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling the Effects of the EU Emissions Trading System in Poland: A Comparison Between IO And CGE Results

Author

Listed:
  • Rokicki, Bartlomiej
  • de Souza, Kenia Barreiro
  • de Santana Ribeiro, Luiz Carlos

Abstract

As a number one Europe’s coal generator, Poland is the European Union (EU) member state mostly affected directly by European green policies. In this context, this paper aims to measure the impact of the EU Emissions Trading System on the Polish economy. Additionally, we compare the results based on two different methodologies – Input-Output model and Computable General Equilibrium model. To the best of our knowledge this is the first time when these approaches are directly compared in this context. Our results show the same directions and general conclusions in both methodologies; however, the IO approach may overestimate the impact of carbon tax on national economy and the emissions. We find that while IO simulations predict a reduction in emissions between 5.13% and 8.77%, CGE model indicates that expected fall in emissions oscillates between 1.24% and 2.32% only. Sectoral analysis shows however, that the differences in results are not necessarily linear.

Suggested Citation

  • Rokicki, Bartlomiej & de Souza, Kenia Barreiro & de Santana Ribeiro, Luiz Carlos, 2023. "Modelling the Effects of the EU Emissions Trading System in Poland: A Comparison Between IO And CGE Results," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 53(2), 14.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jrapmc:339977
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.339977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/339977/files/Rokicki.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.339977?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Perrier, Quentin & Quirion, Philippe, 2018. "How shifting investment towards low-carbon sectors impacts employment: Three determinants under scrutiny," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 464-483.
    2. Yasuhide Okuyama & Joost R. Santos, 2014. "Disaster Impact And Input--Output Analysis," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Manuel Alejandro Cardenete & Ferran Sancho, 2012. "The Role Of Supply Constraints In Multiplier Analysis," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 21-34, June.
    4. Kevin A. Hassett & Aparna Mathur & Gilbert E. Metcalf, 2009. "The Incidence of a U.S. Carbon Tax: A Lifetime and Regional Analysis," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2), pages 155-178.
    5. Randall W. Jackson & Amir Borges Ferreira Neto & Elham Erfanian & Péter Járosi, 2019. "Woody Biomass Processing and Rural Regional Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 33(3), pages 234-247, August.
    6. Allan, Grant J. & Lecca, Patrizio & Swales, Kim, 2017. "The impacts of temporary but anticipated tourism spending: An application to the Glasgow 2014 Commonwealth Games," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 325-337.
    7. da Silva Freitas, Lucio Flavio & de Santana Ribeiro, Luiz Carlos & de Souza, Kênia Barreiro & Hewings, Geoffrey John Dennis, 2016. "The distributional effects of emissions taxation in Brazil and their implications for climate policy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 37-44.
    8. R.A. McDougall, 1993. "Short-Run Effects of A Carbon Tax," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-100, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    9. Liu, Yu & Lu, Yingying, 2015. "The Economic impact of different carbon tax revenue recycling schemes in China: A model-based scenario analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 96-105.
    10. Chen, Zi-yue & Nie, Pu-yan, 2016. "Effects of carbon tax on social welfare: A case study of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1607-1615.
    11. repec:wbk:wbpubs:29687 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Eskinder Demisse Gemechu & Isabela Butnar & Maria Llop & Francesc Castells, 2014. "Economic and environmental effects of CO 2 taxation: an input-output analysis for Spain," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(5), pages 751-768, May.
    13. Sam Meng & Mahinda Siriwardana & Judith McNeill, 2014. "The Impact of the Australian Carbon Tax on Industries and Households," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 8(1), pages 15-37, February.
    14. Aijun Hu & Wei Xie & Ning Li & Xuanhua Xu & Zhonghui Ji & Jidong Wu, 2014. "Analyzing regional economic impact and resilience: a case study on electricity outages caused by the 2008 snowstorms in southern China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 70(2), pages 1019-1030, January.
    15. Jan Witajewski-Baltvilks & Piotr Lewandowski & Aleksander Szpor & Jan Baran & Marek Antosiewicz, 2018. "Managing coal sector transition under the ambitious emission reduction scenario in Poland. Focus on labour," IBS Research Reports 04/2018, Instytut Badan Strukturalnych.
    16. Jan Hagemejer & Zbigniew Żółkiewski, 2013. "Short-run impact of the implementation of EU climate and energy package for Poland: computable general equilibrium model simulations," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 44(3), pages 237-260.
    17. World Bank & Ecofys, "undated". "State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2018," World Bank Publications - Reports 29687, The World Bank Group.
    18. Beckman, Jayson & Hertel, Thomas & Tyner, Wallace, 2011. "Validating energy-oriented CGE models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 799-806, September.
    19. Balázs Égert, 2012. "Climate Change Policies in Poland: Minimising Abatement Costs," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 953, OECD Publishing.
    20. Kiuila, Olga & Sleszynski, Jerzy, 2003. "Expected effects of the ecological tax reform for the Polish economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 103-120, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tuyen Pham & Clara Bone & G. Jason Jolley, 2024. "Assessing the Economic Impacts of Sustainable Energy: An Analysis of Ohio’s Community Solar Program," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nils Ohlendorf & Michael Jakob & Jan Christoph Minx & Carsten Schröder & Jan Christoph Steckel, 2021. "Distributional Impacts of Carbon Pricing: A Meta-Analysis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 78(1), pages 1-42, January.
    2. Nils Ohlendorf & Michael Jakob & Jan Christoph Minx & Carsten Schröder & Jan Christoph Steckel, 2018. "Distributional Impacts of Climate Mitigation Policies - a Meta-Analysis," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1776, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Wesseh, Presley K. & Lin, Boqiang, 2018. "Optimal carbon taxes for China and implications for power generation, welfare, and the environment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-8.
    4. Dorothée Charlier & Mouez Fodha & Djamel Kirat, 2023. "Residential CO2 Emissions in Europe and Carbon Taxation: A Country-Level Assessment," The Energy Journal, , vol. 44(5), pages 187-206, September.
    5. Nong, Duy & Nguyen, Duong Binh & Nguyen, Trung H. & Wang, Can & Siriwardana, Mahinda, 2020. "A stronger energy strategy for a new era of economic development in Vietnam: A quantitative assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    6. Shenghao Feng & Xiujian Peng & Philip Adams, 2021. "Energy and Economic Implications of Carbon Neutrality in China -- A Dynamic General Equilibrium Analysis," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-318, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    7. Zhang, Hailing & Liu, Changxin & Wang, Can, 2021. "Extreme climate events and economic impacts in China: A CGE analysis with a new damage function in IAM," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    8. Dorband, Ira Irina & Jakob, Michael & Kalkuhl, Matthias & Steckel, Jan Christoph, 2019. "Poverty and distributional effects of carbon pricing in low- and middle-income countries – A global comparative analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 246-257.
    9. Wang, Qian & Hubacek, Klaus & Feng, Kuishuang & Wei, Yi-Ming & Liang, Qiao-Mei, 2016. "Distributional effects of carbon taxation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1123-1131.
    10. Shuyang Chen, 2022. "The inequality impacts of the carbon tax in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Freyre, Alisa & Klinke, Sandra & Patel, Martin K., 2020. "Carbon tax and energy programs for buildings: Rivals or allies?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    12. Antosiewicz, Marek & Fuentes, J. Rodrigo & Lewandowski, Piotr & Witajewski-Baltvilks, Jan, 2022. "Distributional effects of emission pricing in a carbon-intensive economy: The case of Poland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    13. Lin, Boqiang & Jia, Zhijie, 2018. "The energy, environmental and economic impacts of carbon tax rate and taxation industry: A CGE based study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 558-568.
    14. Cristian Mardones P. & Tamara Muñoz Z., 2017. "Impuesto al CO2 en el sector eléctrico chileno: efectividad y efectos macroeconómicos," Journal Economía Chilena (The Chilean Economy), Central Bank of Chile, vol. 20(1), pages 004-025, April.
    15. Liu, Lirong & Huang, Charley Z. & Huang, Guohe & Baetz, Brian & Pittendrigh, Scott M., 2018. "How a carbon tax will affect an emission-intensive economy: A case study of the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 817-826.
    16. Paula Pereda & Andrea Lucchesi, Carolina Policarpo Garcia, Bruno Toni Palialol, 2019. "Neutral carbon tax and environmental targets in Brazil," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2019_02, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    17. Tang, Ruihong & Yang, Lei & Ji, Jingna, 2023. "Impacts of fairness concerns on financing equilibrium in a low-carbon supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    18. Yang, Dong-xiao & Chen, Zi-yue & Yang, Yong-cong & Nie, Pu-yan, 2019. "Green financial policies and capital flows," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 522(C), pages 135-146.
    19. Maruf Rahman Maxim & Kerstin Zander, 2020. "Green Tax Reform and Employment Double Dividend in Australia Should Australia Follow Europe’s Footsteps? A CGE Analysis," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 14(4), pages 454-472, November.
    20. Zhang, Hongxia & Hewings, Geoffrey J.D. & Zheng, Xinye, 2019. "The effects of carbon taxation in China: An analysis based on energy input-output model in hybrid units," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 223-234.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jrapmc:339977. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mcrsaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.