IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jordng/330565.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A PDCA Cycle Analysis of Revitalization Project's Performance Management

Author

Listed:
  • Son, Eunil

Abstract

The Revitalization Project was to reflect radical changes in the idea and philosophy of rural development. The Revitalization Project which started in 2005 was terminated in 2010. Accordingly, we need to analyze the policy outcomes of Revitalization Project. This study verified the operation planning for performance management of Revitalization Project through PDCA cycle. The methodologies for analysis are literature review, survey of public officials in 70 Revitalization Project cities and counties. The survey was carried out in October 2012 and 173 people from 70 cities and counties answered. The findings are as follows: First, there was a positive relationship between the planning phase and the implementation phase. Second, there was also a positive relationship between the implementation phase and the project's completion phase. Third, there was a positive relationship between the planning phase and the completion phase. Finally, the implementation phase was a partial mediator on the relationship between the planning phase and the completion phase. Based on these findings, the implications and limitations of the research findings were discussed, and recommendations for future research were provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Son, Eunil, 2012. "A PDCA Cycle Analysis of Revitalization Project's Performance Management," Journal of Rural Development/Nongchon-Gyeongje, Korea Rural Economic Institute, vol. 35(4), October.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jordng:330565
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.330565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/330565/files/RE35-4-02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.330565?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Community/Rural/Urban Development;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jordng:330565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/kreinkr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.