IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jordng/330523.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consolidation of Rural-Oriented Administrative Districts and It's Economic Effects

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Hyunjoong

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to investigate the potential economic effects of consolidation of rural administrative districts even though municipal consolidation has been focused on urban areas in Korea. We utilize two methodologies to identify rural districts that can be consolidated. First, we identify rural districts suitable for the consolidation through cluster analyses. Second, we examine the economic effects of the consolidation based on a minimum cost approach. Following the methodologies, we identify four rural regions that are suitable for municipal consolidation. They are Yoenchoen- Dongduchoen, Gosung-Injae, Changnyeong-Uiryeng and Yangsan- Gijang. With respect to per capita expenditure savings projection, Gijang-Yangsan is expected to save the expenditure by 86% through the consolidation and 33% for Gosung-Injae, 23% for Yoenchoen-Dongduchoen and 21% was estimated for Changnyeong-Uiryeng. The results may cast important light on the necessity of consolidation in all four rural regions. While the present study entails limitations in data and empirical applications, it provides a theoretical basis and empirical implications for municipal consolidation in rural regions. The present study concludes with some policy implications and directions for future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Hyunjoong, 2011. "Consolidation of Rural-Oriented Administrative Districts and It's Economic Effects," Journal of Rural Development/Nongchon-Gyeongje, Korea Rural Economic Institute, vol. 34(3), July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jordng:330523
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.330523
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/330523/files/RE34-3-01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.330523?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jordng:330523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/kreinkr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.