IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jloagb/90376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Valuing Public Price Reporting: The Iowa Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Lawrence, John D.
  • Shaffer, John A.
  • Hayenga, Marvin L.

Abstract

Auction market users and operators were surveyed regarding their source and use of livestock auction price information. Although important for marketing and to a lesser extent production decisions, only 30 percent preferred publicly reported prices over reports from market operators or other sources. The small share of market users willing to pay for public price reports suggests acceptable substitutes are available. Based on these results it is unlikely that user fees will be able to replace the current level of public support for auction market price reporting.

Suggested Citation

  • Lawrence, John D. & Shaffer, John A. & Hayenga, Marvin L., 1996. "Valuing Public Price Reporting: The Iowa Experience," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jloagb:90376
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.90376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/90376/files/JAB14one2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.90376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheryl J. Wachenheim & Eric A. DeVuyst, 2001. "Strategic response to mandatory reporting legislation in the U.S. livestock and meat industries: Are collusive opportunities enhanced?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(2), pages 177-195.
    2. Martin, Beutler & Fausti, Scott & Qasmi, Bashir, 2006. "Perspectives of Cow/Calf Producers in the Dakotas - Marketing Channel Selection," Issue Briefs 2006479, South Dakota State University, Department of Economics.
    3. Fausti, Scott W. & Diersen, Matthew A., 2005. "Price Transparency in the Voluntary Price Reporting System for Live Cattle: Theory and Empirical Evidence from South Dakota," Economics Staff Papers 32027, South Dakota State University, Department of Economics.
    4. Fausti, Scott W. & Qasmi, Bashir A. & Landblom, Douglas G. & Beutler, Martin & Johnson, Patricia S. & Gates, Roger N. & Patterson, Hubert H. & Salverson, Robin R., 2007. "Public Price Reporting, Marketing Channel Selection, and Price Discovery: The Perspective of Cow/Calf Producers in the Dakotas," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 25(1), pages 1-18.
    5. Pruitt, J. Ross & Tonsor, Glynn T. & Brooks, Kathleen R. & Johnson, Rachel J., 2013. "End User Preferences for USDA Market Information," 2013 Annual Meeting, February 2-5, 2013, Orlando, Florida 143007, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    6. Fausti, Scott W. & Diersen, Matthew A., 2003. "Did The Voluntary Price Reporting System Fail To Provide Price Transparency In The Cash Market For Dressed Steers: Evidence From South Dakota," Economics Staff Papers 32012, South Dakota State University, Department of Economics.
    7. Fausti, Scott W. & Diersen, Matthew A. & Sun, He, 2003. "Discontinued Voluntary Price Reports For Live Cattle: Will They Be Missed By Producers?," Economics Staff Papers 32019, South Dakota State University, Department of Economics.
    8. Fausti, Scott W. & Keimig, R. & Diersen, Matthew A. & Kim, Han & Santos, Joseph M., 2002. "Mandatory Versus Voluntary Price Reporting: An Empirical Investigation Of The Market Transparency Controversy," Economics Staff Papers 32024, South Dakota State University, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Demand and Price Analysis;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jloagb:90376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeaggea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.