IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlaare/30934.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Protocol Or A Set Of Standards To Guide Agricultural Economics Research

Author

Listed:
  • Debertin, David L.
  • Luzar, E. Jane
  • Chambers, Orlando D.

Abstract

This article examines some difficult decisions that agricultural economists must confront in doing research. Over many years, rules and standards have developed in agricultural economics that guide researchers, providing an underlying framework for research methods. This article deals with applying these seldom discussed guidelines to specific research situations confronted by agricultural economists. With this article, we hope to stimulate a dialogue among agricultural economists about the need for additional, appropriate methodological guidelines in agricultural economics research.

Suggested Citation

  • Debertin, David L. & Luzar, E. Jane & Chambers, Orlando D., 1995. "A Protocol Or A Set Of Standards To Guide Agricultural Economics Research," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 20(01), pages 1-14, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlaare:30934
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.30934
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/30934/files/20010082.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.30934?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McCloskey, Donald N, 1983. "The Rhetoric of Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 21(2), pages 481-517, June.
    2. Richard E. Just & Gordon C. Rausser, 1989. "An Assessment of the Agricultural Economics Profession," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(5), pages 1177-1190.
    3. R. J. Freund & D. L. Debertin, 1975. "Variable Selection and Statistical Significance: A Sampling Experiment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 57(4), pages 721-722.
    4. Richard E. Just & Gordon C. Rausser, 1989. "An Assessment of the Agricultural Economics Profession," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(5), pages 1177-1190.
    5. Dewald, William G & Thursby, Jerry G & Anderson, Richard G, 1986. "Replication in Empirical Economics: The Journal of Money, Credit and Banking Project," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(4), pages 587-603, September.
    6. Johnson, Stanley R. & Rausser, Gordon C., 1977. "Systems Analysis and Simulation: A Survey of Applications in Agricultural and Resource Economics," A Survey of Agricultural Economics Literature, Volume 2: Quantitative Methods in Agricultural Economics, 1940s to 1970s,, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Boulding, Kenneth E, 1969. "Economics as a Moral Science," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(1), pages 1-12, March.
    8. Richard A. King, 1979. "Choices and Consequences," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 61(5), pages 839-848.
    9. Debertin, David L. & Pagoulatos, Angelos, 1991. "Research in Agricultural Economics 1919-1990:Seventy-two Years of Change," Staff Papers 158755, University of Kentucky, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    10. Dr. David L. Debertin & Dr. Angelos Pagoulatos, 1992. "Research in Agricultural Economics 1919–1990: Seventy-Two Years of Change," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Desmond Ng & Kerry Litzenberg, 2019. "Overcoming disciplinary divides in higher education: the case of agricultural economics," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-7, December.
    2. Josephson, Anna & Michler, Jeffrey D., 2018. "Viewpoint: Beasts of the field? Ethics in agricultural and applied economics," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-11.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robison, Lindon J. & Colyer, Dale, 1994. "Reflections On Relevance Of Professional Journals," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 26(01), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Hendrik P. van Dalen, 2019. "Values of Economists Matter in the Art and Science of Economics," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(3), pages 472-499, August.
    3. Blank, Steven C., 1997. "A Decade of Decline and Evolution in Agricultural Economics Programs: 1985-96," 1997 Annual Meeting, July 13-16, 1997, Reno\ Sparks, Nevada 35801, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    4. Ahmadi-Esfahani, Fredoun Z. & Bonnor, Kylie A., 1996. "The Australian Agricultural Economics Profession: An Appraisal Of Some Current Trends," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 40(3), pages 1-20, December.
    5. William Milberg, 1999. "The Rhetoric of Policy Relevance in International Economics," Macroeconomics 9904009, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Böhringer, Christoph & Rutherford, Thomas Fox & Wiegard, Wolfgang, 2003. "Computable general equilibrium analysis: Opening a black box," ZEW Discussion Papers 03-56, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    7. Michael Roos & Matthias Reccius, 2024. "Narratives in economics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 303-341, April.
    8. Libby, Lawrence W., 1991. "Professional Diversity In Agricultural Economics: Salvation Or Suicide?," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(01), pages 1-14, July.
    9. Selley, Roger A. & Wilson, Paul N., 1997. "Risk Research And Public Outreach: A Tale Of Two Cultures?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(2), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Cook, Michael L., 1992. "Agribusiness In A Global Economy: Challenges For An Evolving Profession," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(01), pages 1-6, July.
    11. Sheila Dow & Robert McMaster & Andrew Cumbers, 2018. "Sine praejudicio? Economics and the 2014 Scottish independence referendum [Economics as a moral science, American Economic Review]," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 42(3), pages 597-615.
    12. John Quiggin, 1987. "Egoistic Rationality and Public Choice: A Critical Review of Theory and Evidence," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 63(1), pages 10-21, March.
    13. Hardaker, J. Brian, 1985. "Beliefs And Values In Agricultural Economics Research," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 29(2), pages 1-10, August.
    14. Bharat M. Upadhyay & Douglas L. Young, 2004. "An Operational Approach For Evaluating Investment Risk: An Application To The No-Till Transition," Others 0412002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Grahame Thompson, 1993. "Causality in economics: Rhetorical ethic or positivist empiric?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 47-71, February.
    16. Johnson, Marc A., 1991. "The Department's Role in Preparing Individuals and Teams for the Challenge of the 1990s," Staff Papers 118196, Kansas State University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    17. Wilfred Dolfsma, 2001. "Economists as subjects: Toward a psychology of economists," Forum for Social Economics, Springer;The Association for Social Economics, vol. 30(2), pages 77-88, March.
    18. Petrick, Martin, 2004. "Can Econometric Analysis Make (Agricultural) Economics A Hard Science? Critical Remarks And Implications For Economic Methodology," IAMO Discussion Papers 14911, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    19. Michael A. Clemens, 2017. "The Meaning Of Failed Replications: A Review And Proposal," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 326-342, February.
    20. J. Kornai., 2002. "The System Paradigm," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, vol. 4.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlaare:30934. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/waeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.