IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijofsd/346722.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Microalgae-based Food: Consumer Perception and Willingness to Pay in Austria—a Discrete Choice Based Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Meixner, Oliver
  • Nieschalk, Richard
  • Haas, Rainer

Abstract

Algae-based foods have been gaining increasing popularity in recent years and hold tremendous potential, provided that there is greater awareness and knowledge about microalgae-based foods within both the general population and the food industry. These products not only offer health benefits for the human body but are also cost-effective and environmentally sustainable to produce. Using a discrete choice experiment (DCE), we assessed consumer perception and willingness to pay (WTP) of Austrian consumers for innovative food items made from microalgae, using algae crackers as an illustrative example. To approximate the weighting of the product attributes of origin, price, flavor, production method and packaging, we employed Choice Based Conjoint Analysis (CBCA) through an online survey (n = 301 participants). Subsequently, we approximated WTP for each product attribute based on the outcomes of the CBCA. The study reveals that, on the whole, microalgae-based food products are favorably perceived by consumers. The findings generally align with prior research in the literature, albeit with some noteworthy distinctions. For instance, there is a higher WTP for organic microalgae-based food compared to similar studies where regional production was evaluated to be of higher importance. Consequently, innovative microalgae foods seem to have significant potential in consumer food markets. Food producers should consider the expectations and perceptions of consumers in order to be able to successfully introduce novel microalgae food products in this, currently, niche market.

Suggested Citation

  • Meixner, Oliver & Nieschalk, Richard & Haas, Rainer, . "Microalgae-based Food: Consumer Perception and Willingness to Pay in Austria—a Discrete Choice Based Experiment," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 14(04).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijofsd:346722
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.346722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/346722/files/MICROALGAE-BASED%20FOOD%20CONSUMER%20PERCEPTION.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.346722?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chandukala, Sandeep R. & Kim, Jaehwan & Otter, Thomas & Rossi, Peter E. & Allenby, Greg M., 2008. "Choice Models in Marketing: Economic Assumptions, Challenges and Trends," Foundations and Trends(R) in Marketing, now publishers, vol. 2(2), pages 97-184, September.
    2. Reto Hofstetter & Klaus M. Miller & Harley Krohmer & Z. John Zhang, 2020. "A De-biased Direct Question Approach to Measuring Consumers' Willingness to Pay," Papers 2005.11318, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bernhard Baumgartner & Daniel Guhl & Thomas Kneib & Winfried J. Steiner, 2018. "Flexible estimation of time-varying effects for frequently purchased retail goods: a modeling approach based on household panel data," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(4), pages 837-873, October.
    2. Schlereth, Christian & Skiera, Bernd & Schulz, Fabian, 2018. "Why do consumers prefer static instead of dynamic pricing plans? An empirical study for a better understanding of the low preferences for time-variant pricing plans," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 1165-1179.
    3. Hui Li, 2019. "Intertemporal Price Discrimination with Complementary Products: E-Books and E-Readers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2665-2694, June.
    4. Inderst, Roman & Obradovits, Martin, 2019. "Competitive Strategies when Consumers are Relative Thinkers: Implications for Pricing, Promotions, and Product Choice," EconStor Preprints 253658, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    5. Kabbashi M. Suliman, 2013. "Factors Affecting the Choice of Households’ Primary Cooking Fuel in Sudan," Working Papers 760, Economic Research Forum, revised Jun 2013.
    6. Allenby, Greg M., 2017. "Structural forecasts for marketing data," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 433-441.
    7. Anocha Aribarg & Thomas Otter & Daniel Zantedeschi & Greg M. Allenby & Taylor Bentley & David J. Curry & Marc Dotson & Ty Henderson & Elisabeth Honka & Rajeev Kohli & Kamel Jedidi & Stephan Seiler & X, 2018. "Advancing Non-compensatory Choice Models in Marketing," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 5(1), pages 82-92, March.
    8. Yao, Yao (Alex) & Yang, Sha & Sudhir, K., 2024. "Separating substitution and psychological effects of price with a two-step conjoint approach: Application to luxury goods," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 344-361.
    9. Shuyu Zhou & Yeming (Yale) Gong & René de Koster, 2016. "Designing self-storage warehouses with customer choice," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(10), pages 3080-3104, May.
    10. Oliver Meixner & Felix Katt, 2020. "Assessing the Impact of COVID-19 on Consumer Food Safety Perceptions—A Choice-Based Willingness to Pay Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    11. Lee, Sanghak & Kim, Hyowon & Kim, Jaehwan & Allenby, Greg M., 2018. "A choice model for mixed decision variables," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 82-96.
    12. Ali Aouad & Danny Segev, 2021. "Display Optimization for Vertically Differentiated Locations Under Multinomial Logit Preferences," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3519-3550, June.
    13. Milad Haghani & Michiel C. J. Bliemer & John M. Rose & Harmen Oppewal & Emily Lancsar, 2021. "Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Macro-scale analysis of literature and effectiveness of bias mitigation methods," Papers 2102.02945, arXiv.org.
    14. Fasih Ahmed & Muhammad Nawaz & Aisha Jadoon, 2022. "Topic Modeling of the Pakistani Economy in English Newspapers via Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA)," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    15. Lim, Jooyoung & Hahn, Minhi, 2020. "Regulatory focus and decision rules: Are prevention-focused consumers regret minimizers?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 343-350.
    16. Srikanth Jagabathula & Gustavo Vulcano, 2018. "A Partial-Order-Based Model to Estimate Individual Preferences Using Panel Data," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(4), pages 1609-1628, April.
    17. Nino Hardt & Alex Varbanov & Greg M. Allenby, 2016. "Monetizing Ratings Data for Product Research," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 713-726, September.
    18. Marcel Fritz & Christian Schlereth & Stefan Figge, 2011. "Empirical Evaluation of Fair Use Flat Rate Strategies for Mobile Internet," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 3(5), pages 269-277, October.
    19. Vivek F. Farias & Srikanth Jagabathula & Devavrat Shah, 2013. "A Nonparametric Approach to Modeling Choice with Limited Data," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(2), pages 305-322, December.
    20. Will, Christian & Lehmann, Nico & Baumgartner, Nora & Feurer, Sven & Jochem, Patrick & Fichtner, Wolf, 2022. "Consumer understanding and evaluation of carbon-neutral electric vehicle charging services," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijofsd:346722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/centmde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.