IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijameu/164348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The US Farm Bill: Lessons for CAP Reform?

Author

Listed:
  • Bureau, Jean-Christophe

Abstract

In an analysis first posted on his blog at http://capreform.eu, the author considers differences between the agricultural support programmes of the United States of America and those of the European Union, in terms both of levels of support and of institutional processes. The likely content of the forthcoming US Farm Bill is discussed, including the likelihood of a rebalancing of direct and indirect farm support away from ‘decoupled’ payments. One possible consequence is reinforcement of the arguments of those who feel that the CAP should move back towards more product-specific subsidy and away from environmental support – as many emerging countries are already doing. Bad economic ideas, such as recoupling or making payments countercyclical, will gain influence in the EU if it becomes the only ‘country’ sticking to the spirit of the WTO discipline

Suggested Citation

  • Bureau, Jean-Christophe, 2013. "The US Farm Bill: Lessons for CAP Reform?," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 2(2), pages 1-3, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijameu:164348
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.164348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/164348/files/Bureau.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.164348?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Pierre Butault & Jean-Christophe Bureau & Heinz-Peter Witzke & Thomas Heckelei, 2012. "Comparative analysis of agricultural support within the major agricultural trading nations," Working Papers hal-01072292, HAL.
    2. repec:aei:rpaper:32548 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Krzyżanowski, Julian, 2016. "Prospects and threats for EU agriculture and consumers resulting from the potential TTIP agreement," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 253698, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean-Christophe Bureau & Sébastien Jean, 2013. "Trade liberalization in the bio-economy: coping with a new landscape," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 44(s1), pages 173-182, November.
    2. Kym Anderson, 2013. "Agricultural price distortions: trends and volatility, past, and prospective," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 44(s1), pages 163-171, November.
    3. Orden, David, 2013. "The Changing Structure of Domestic Support and Its Implications for Trade," Commissioned Papers 146657, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network.
    4. Krzyżanowski, Julian, 2016. "Prospects and threats for EU agriculture and consumers resulting from the potential TTIP agreement," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 253698, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    5. Hubbard, Carmen & Luca, Lucien & Luca, Mihaela & Alexandri, Cecilia, 2014. "Romanian farm support: has European Union membership made a difference?," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 116(2), pages 1-7, August.
    6. Krzyżanowski, Julian T., 2016. "The Problems of Direct Support for Plant Production in the European Union and the United States," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 16(31), pages 1-9, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijameu:164348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.