IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ifaamr/303723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Farmer satisfaction and cocoa cooperative performance: evidence from Tocache, Peru

Author

Listed:
  • Higuchi, Angie
  • Coq-Huelva, Daniel
  • Arias-Gutierrez, Ruth
  • Alfalla-Luque, Rafaela

Abstract

Cocoa marketing cooperatives are essential in the current model of governance of cocoa production and distribution in Peru and other developing countries. Because farmer satisfaction is particularly important for the success and development of cooperatives, this article focuses on an analysis of the factors related to farmer satisfaction as well as the identification of demographic and socio-economic elements that can explain the different levels of satisfaction among different cooperative members. Data obtained through a survey of 150 cocoa farmers were analyzed through three main statistical methods: (1) an exploratory factor analysis with a principal component analysis method; (2) cluster analysis; and (3) an independent samples t-test. The results confirm that farmer satisfaction is explained by a complex set of cognitive and psycho-social elements and pro-social emotions. Finally, the results indicate that some socio-economic features such as farm size or household size are associated with the varying existing levels of farmer satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Higuchi, Angie & Coq-Huelva, Daniel & Arias-Gutierrez, Ruth & Alfalla-Luque, Rafaela, 2020. "Farmer satisfaction and cocoa cooperative performance: evidence from Tocache, Peru," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 23(2), May.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifaamr:303723
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.303723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/303723/files/ifamr2019.0166.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.303723?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hashemi, Masoumeh & Mazandarani Zadeh, Hamed & Zarghami, Mahdi & Demeke, Betelhem W. & Taraghi Delgarm, Razieh, 2023. "An analysis of why rehabilitation and balancing programs for aquifers do not meet water organizations' targets (a case study of the Qazvin aquifer in Iran)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    2. G. Yoganandan & Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahman & M. Vasan & Abdelrhman Meero, 2022. "Evaluating agripreneurs’ satisfaction: exploring the effect of demographics and emporographics," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Ziming Liu & Jie Qu & Xinrui Wu & Xing Niu & Shuyi Feng, 2024. "Improving member satisfaction with cooperatives: The role of participation in governance," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(3), pages 703-722, September.
    4. Armando Borda & Oswaldo Morales & Hildy Teegen & Gareth H. Rees & Maria Alejandra Gonzalez-Perez, 2021. "Addressing Sustainable Rural Development with Shared Value: A Peruvian Model from the Cacao Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Dumenu, William Kwadwo & Appiah, Louis Gyekye & Paul, Carola & Darr, Dietrich, 2023. "Should forest enterprises formalize? Insight from a multi-dimensional characterization of informal baobab enterprises," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifaamr:303723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifamaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.