IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ifaamr/119977.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Food Risks and Type I & II Errors

Author

Listed:
  • Nganje, William E.
  • Skilton, Paul F.

Abstract

The global food supply network is becoming increasing vulnerable to food safety and food de-fense risks due to failures in prevention and control measures. We develop the idea of control oriented supply chain security management in the context of global food supply networks. We identify a variety of failure points where security systems can produce Type I (false positive) and Type II (false negative) errors that create disruptions, and explain how the use of ex-ante preven-tion measures can lead to opportunities for continuous reductions in costs and food risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Nganje, William E. & Skilton, Paul F., 2011. "Food Risks and Type I & II Errors," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifaamr:119977
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.119977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/119977/files/20100084_Formatted.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.119977?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eduardo M.R.A Engel, 2001. "Poisoned grapes, mad cows and protectionism," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 91-111.
    2. Eduardo M.R.A Engel, 2000. "Poisoned grapes, mad cows and protectionism," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 91-111.
    3. Nganje, William E. & Richards, Timothy J. & Bravo, Jesus & Hu, Na & Kagan, Albert & Acharya, Ram N. & Edwards, Mark R., 2009. "Food Safety and Defense Risks in the U.S.-Mexico Produce Chain," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 24(2), pages 1-5.
    4. Lee, Hau L. & Whang, Seungjin, 2005. "Higher supply chain security with lower cost: Lessons from total quality management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 289-300, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bitsch, Vera & Koković, Nevena & Rombach, Meike, 2014. "Risk Communication and Market Effects during Foodborne Illnesses: A Comparative Case Study of Bacterial Outbreaks in the U.S. and in Germany," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 17(3), pages 1-18, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Donald Larson & Will Martin & Sebnem Sahin & Marinos Tsigas, 2016. "Agricultural Policies and Trade Paths in Turkey," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(8), pages 1194-1224, August.
    2. Klimenko, Mikhail M., 2009. "Policies and international trade agreements on technical compatibility for industries with network externalities," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(2), pages 151-166, April.
    3. Cadot, Olivier & Suwa-Eisenmann, Akiko & Traça, Daniel, 2003. "OGM et relations commerciales transatlantiques," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 68.
    4. Daniel M. Sturm, 2006. "Product standards, trade disputes, and protectionism," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(2), pages 564-581, May.
    5. Pourakbar, M. & Zuidwijk, R.A., 2018. "The role of customs in securing containerized global supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 331-340.
    6. Lee, Jongkuk & Palekar, Udatta S. & Qualls, William, 2011. "Supply chain efficiency and security: Coordination for collaborative investment in technology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(3), pages 568-578, May.
    7. Cheng, Yung-Hsiang & Tsai, Yi-Ling, 2009. "Factors influencing shippers to use multiple country consolidation services in international distribution centers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 78-88, November.
    8. Giovanni Circella, 2006. "Towards the adoption of technological innovations: decision processes in transport policy definition," ERSA conference papers ersa06p556, European Regional Science Association.
    9. Zuidwijk, R.A. & Veenstra, A.W., 2010. "The Value of Information in Container Transport: Leveraging the Triple Bottom Line," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2010-039-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    10. Urciuoli, Luca, 2016. "What are the causes of transport insecurity? Results from a survey with transport operators," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 189-202.
    11. Schnetzler, Matthias J. & Sennheiser, Andreas & Schonsleben, Paul, 2007. "A decomposition-based approach for the development of a supply chain strategy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 21-42, January.
    12. Kala Krishna & Yelena Sheveleva, 2017. "Wheat or Strawberries? Intermediated Trade with Limited Contracting," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 9(3), pages 28-62, August.
    13. Yang, Ching-Chiao & Hsu, Wei-Lin, 2018. "Evaluating the impact of security management practices on resilience capability in maritime firms—a relational perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 220-233.
    14. M. J. Hermoso-Orzáez & J. Garzón-Moreno, 2022. "Risk management methodology in the supply chain: a case study applied," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(2), pages 1051-1075, June.
    15. Noman Arshed & Kamran Hameed & Asma Saher, 2022. "An Empirical Analysis of Supply Chain Competitiveness and Cleaner Production," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    16. Scott DuHadway & Steven Carnovale & Benjamin Hazen, 2019. "Understanding risk management for intentional supply chain disruptions: risk detection, risk mitigation, and risk recovery," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 179-198, December.
    17. Yang, Jie & Wong, Christina W.Y. & Lai, Kee-hung & Ntoko, Alfred Ngome, 2009. "The antecedents of dyadic quality performance and its effect on buyer-supplier relationship improvement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 243-251, July.
    18. Männistö, Toni & Hintsa, Juha, 2015. "A Decade of GAO’s Supply Chain Security Oversight," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Operational Excellence in Logistics and Supply Chains: Optimization Methods, Data-driven Approaches and Security Insights. Proceedings of the Hamburg , volume 22, pages 443-472, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    19. Amulya Gurtu & Jestin Johny, 2021. "Supply Chain Risk Management: Literature Review," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, January.
    20. Urciuoli, Luca, 2018. "The risk of standards proliferation – An analysis of differences between private and public transport standards," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 591-602.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifaamr:119977. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifamaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.