IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/iepeoa/175292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agricultural Protectionism Of The European Union In The Conditions Of International Trade Liberalization

Author

Listed:
  • Marković, Ivan
  • Marković, Milan

Abstract

The key objective of agricultural protectionism is reflected in the protection and developing of agriculture sector. Integrated parts of this policy in the European Union are the initial model of agricultural protectionism and a new strategy of agricultural policy, which emerged as a response to the shortcomings of previously existing model. The paper presents the key reforms of agricultural policy, conditioned to internal problems and pressures in the negotiations of trade liberalization of agricultural and food products. Reform solutions for the period of 2014 to the 2020 will have similar goals. The priority will be to develop sustainable food production and sustainable management of natural resources. There is a widespread awareness of sustainable development that includes not only the economic component (which is reflected in the increase in productivity and production efficiency), but also an environmental component (the need to preserve the environment), as well as the social component of sustainable development (integrated rural development). Conducting negotiations in the framework of liberalization of agricultural and food products, there was a gradual reduction of restrictive measures in the field of domestic agriculture protection. However, the European food market is still highly protected from foreign competition because of the many features of the agricultural production sector and the importance of agriculture for the entire society. It is certain that the CAP will lose its narrow agricultural character.

Suggested Citation

  • Marković, Ivan & Marković, Milan, 2014. "Agricultural Protectionism Of The European Union In The Conditions Of International Trade Liberalization," Economics of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 61(2), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iepeoa:175292
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.175292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/175292/files/11%20EP%202%202014-11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.175292?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carsten Daugbjerg & Alan Swinbank, 2007. "The Politics of CAP Reform: Trade Negotiations, Institutional Settings and Blame Avoidance," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 1-22, March.
    2. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:45:y:2007:i::p:1-22 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vehapi, Semir & Šabotić, Zenaida, 2015. "The State And Problems Of Serbian Agriculture," Economics of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 62(1), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Puzić, Goran & Klevernić, Aleksandar & Pavlović, Zoran, 2014. "The Common Agricultural Policy Through Reforms Toward Europe 2020," Economics of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 1-12, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anania, Giovanni, 2007. "Multilateral Negotiations, Preferential Trade Agreements and the CAP. What's Ahead?," Working Papers 7283, TRADEAG - Agricultural Trade Agreements.
    2. Arlindo Cunha & Alan Swinbank, 2009. "Exploring the Determinants of CAP Reform: A Delphi Survey of Key Decision‐Makers," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 235-261, March.
    3. Giovanni Anania, 2007. "Multilateral trade negotiations, preferential trade agreements and European Union’s agricultural policies," QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, Associazione Rossi Doria, issue 3, July.
    4. Feil, Jan-Henning & Mußhoff, Oliver & Roeren-Wiemers, Tobias, 2013. "Einzelbetriebliche Auswirkungen politischer Strukturreformen in der Landwirtschaft: Erste empirische Erkenntnisse," Structural Change in Agriculture/Strukturwandel im Agrarsektor (SiAg) Working Papers 158268, Humboldt University Berlin, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    5. Viviane Gravey & Aron Buzogány, 2021. "For Farmers or the Environment? The European Parliament in the 2013 CAP Reform," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 16-28.
    6. Erjavec, Karmen & Erjavec, Emil, 2015. "‘Greening the CAP’ – Just a fashionable justification? A discourse analysis of the 2014–2020 CAP reform documents," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 53-62.
    7. Furtan, William Hartley & Jensen, Maria Skovager & Sauer, Johannes, 2008. "Rent Seeking and the Common Agricultural Policy: Do member countries free ride on lobbying?," 107th Seminar, January 30-February 1, 2008, Sevilla, Spain 6600, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Erjavec, Karmen & Erjavec, Emil, 2009. "Changing EU agricultural policy discourses? The discourse analysis of Commissioner's speeches 2000-2007," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 218-226, April.
    9. Sören Prehn & Bernhard Brümmer & Stanley R. Thompson, 2015. "Payment decoupling and intra-European calf trade," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 42(4), pages 625-650.
    10. Emil Erjavec & Ilona Rac, 2023. "Improving the Quality of CAP Strategic Planning through Enhancing the Role of Agricultural Economics," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 22(2), pages 71-76, August.
    11. Hardt, Łukasz, 2008. "Wspólna Polityka Rolna A Polityka Spójności W Kontekście Przeglądu Budżetu Ue," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 4(141).
    12. Mugurel Ionel JITEA & Diana Elena DUMITRAȘ & Vasile Alexandru SIMU, 2015. "An ex-ante impact assessment of the Common Agricultural Policy reform in the North-Western Romania," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(2), pages 88-103.
    13. Henning Schmidtke, 2019. "Elite legitimation and delegitimation of international organizations in the media: Patterns and explanations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 633-659, December.
    14. Furtan, William Hartley & Guzel, A. & Karantininis, Kostas, 2007. "The Doha Talks and the Bargaining Surplus in Agriculture," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17.
    15. Erjavec, Emil & Chantreuil, Frédéric & Hanrahan, Kevin & Donnellan, Trevor & Salputra, Guna & Kozar, Maja & van Leeuwen, Myrna, 2011. "Policy assessment of an EU wide flat area CAP payments system," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 1550-1558, July.
    16. M. Bruna Zolin, 2008. "The EU and Asia: World Trade Liberalisation and the Evolution of Agricultural Product Flows," Working Papers 2008_18, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    17. Patricia Garcia-Duran & Montserrat Millet, 2014. "The determinants of CAP reform: learning from the European financial crisis and CAP 2013," UB School of Economics Working Papers 2014/315, University of Barcelona School of Economics.
    18. Young, Linda M. & Hansen, Kathleen C., 2011. "Disconnections in US and EU Agricultural Policy and Trade Negotiations: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, February.
    19. Ewa Kiryluk-Dryjska, 2014. "Fair Division Approach for the European Union’s Structural Policy Budget Allocation: An Application Study," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 597-615, May.
    20. Feil, Jan-Henning & Musshoff, Oliver & Roeren-Wiemers, Tobias, 2014. "Farm level effects of policy reforms in Germany: First empirical evidence," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1036-1047.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iepeoa:175292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iepbgyu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.