IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/gewipr/261546.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adoption energieeffizienter Techniken in kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen – Eine Kausaluntersuchung am Beispiel der Gartenbaubranche

Author

Listed:
  • Hertel, M.
  • Menrad, K.

Abstract

Die Effizienz des Produktionsfaktors Energie gewinnt durch steigende Energiekosten und die nationalen CO²-Emmissionsziele an Bedeutung. In Deutschland existieren im produzierenden Gewerbe sowie in der Landwirtschaft eine Vielzahl kleiner und mittlerer Unternehmen (KMU) deren Energieproduktivität durch die Anwendung innovativer, energieeffizienter Produktionstechniken gesteigert werden kann (BMU-PRESSEDIENST, 2012). Die Adoption effizienter Produktionsmethoden wird dabei nicht nur durch die Rendite der Investition bestimmt, sondern unterliegt ebenso persönlichen und umfeldbezogenen Faktoren der Entscheider. In einer empirischen Strukturgleichungsanalyse auf der Grundlage einer Datenerhebung in 104 produzierenden Unternehmen der Gartenbaubranche konnte eine Diskrepanz zwischen der Investitionsabsicht und der tatsächlichen Technikadoption festgestellt werden, welche mit verschiedenartigen Investitionsrestriktionen begründet wird. In einem alternativen Modell sind die personenbezogenen Merkmale Innovativität und Absorptionsfähigkeit als Prädiktoren einer energieeffizienten Produktionsweise ermittelt worden. Umweltbewusstsein sowie die Eigenschaften der betrachteten Innovationen waren hingegen keine erklärenden Variablen der Energieeffizienz eines Unternehmens.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Hertel, M. & Menrad, K., 2014. "Adoption energieeffizienter Techniken in kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen – Eine Kausaluntersuchung am Beispiel der Gartenbaubranche," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 49, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:gewipr:261546
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.261546
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/261546/files/Bd49Nr26.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/261546/files/Bd49Nr26.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.261546?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcati, Alberto & Guido, Gianluigi & Peluso, Alessandro M., 2008. "The role of SME entrepreneurs' innovativeness and personality in the adoption of innovations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 1579-1590, October.
    2. Kyösti Pietola & Alfons Oude Lansink, 2006. "Energy‐saving Technology Choices by Dutch Glasshouse Firms," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 129-144, March.
    3. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    4. Patterson, Murray G, 1996. "What is energy efficiency? : Concepts, indicators and methodological issues," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 377-390, May.
    5. Arts, Joep W.C. & Frambach, Ruud T. & Bijmolt, Tammo H.A., 2011. "Generalizations on consumer innovation adoption: A meta-analysis on drivers of intention and behavior," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 134-144.
    6. DeCanio, Stephen J., 1993. "Barriers within firms to energy-efficient investments," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(9), pages 906-914, September.
    7. Morwitz, Vicki G. & Steckel, Joel H. & Gupta, Alok, 2007. "When do purchase intentions predict sales?," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 347-364.
    8. Aramyan, Lusine H. & Lansink, Alfons G.J.M. Oude & Verstegen, Jos A.A.M., 2007. "Factors underlying the investment decision in energy-saving systems in Dutch horticulture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 520-527, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hasan, Rajibul & Lowe, Ben & Petrovici, Dan, 2020. "Consumer adoption of pro-poor service innovations in subsistence marketplaces," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 461-475.
    2. Tahani Z. Aldahdouh & Petri Nokelainen & Vesa Korhonen, 2020. "Technology and Social Media Usage in Higher Education: The Influence of Individual Innovativeness," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    3. Capestro, Mauro & Rizzo, Cristian & Kliestik, Tomas & Peluso, Alessandro M. & Pino, Giovanni, 2024. "Enabling digital technologies adoption in industrial districts: The key role of trust and knowledge sharing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    4. Nakada, Tatsuhiro & Shin, Kongjoo & Managi, Shunsuke, 2016. "The effect of demand response on purchase intention of distributed generation: Evidence from Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 307-316.
    5. Salim, Taghreed Abu & El Barachi, May & Mohamed, Ahmed Alfatih D. & Halstead, Susanne & Babreak, Nasser, 2022. "The mediator and moderator roles of perceived cost on the relationship between organizational readiness and the intention to adopt blockchain technology," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    6. Xin-gang, Zhao & Xin, Meng & Ying, Zhou & Pei-ling, Li, 2020. "Policy inducement effect in energy efficiency: An empirical analysis of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    7. Sven Heidenreich & Katrin Talke, 2020. "Consequences of mandated usage of innovations in organizations: developing an innovation decision model of symbolic and forced adoption," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 279-298, December.
    8. He, Yi & You, Ya & Chen, Qimei, 2020. "Our conditional love for the underdog: The effect of brand positioning and the lay theory of achievement on WOM," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 210-222.
    9. Park, Jungkun & Gunn, Frances & Lee, YoungHee & Shim, Scott, 2015. "Consumer acceptance of a revolutionary technology-driven product: The role of adoption in the industrial design development," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 115-124.
    10. Banu Demirel & Ayça Kübra Hızarcı Payne, 2018. "Social Innovation Adoption Behavior: The Case of Zumbara," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Schmidthuber, Lisa & Maresch, Daniela & Ginner, Michael, 2020. "Disruptive technologies and abundance in the service sector - toward a refined technology acceptance model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    12. Masood Ul Hassan & Muhammad Shahid Iqbal & Ume Habibah, 2020. "Self-Service Technology Service Quality: Building Loyalty and Intention Through Technology Trust in Pakistani Service Sector," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, June.
    13. Cecere, Grazia & Corrocher, Nicoletta & Guerzoni, Marco, 2018. "Price or performance? A probabilistic choice analysis of the intention to buy electric vehicles in European countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 19-32.
    14. Guo, Yuntao & Souders, Dustin & Labi, Samuel & Peeta, Srinivas & Benedyk, Irina & Li, Yujie, 2021. "Paving the way for autonomous Vehicles: Understanding autonomous vehicle adoption and vehicle fuel choice under user heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 364-398.
    15. Dang, Ngoc Bich & Bertrandias, Laurent, 2023. "Social robots as healing aids: How and why powerlessness influences the intention to adopt social robots," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    16. Beke, Frank T. & Eggers, Felix & Verhoef, Peter C. & Wieringa, Jaap E., 2022. "Consumers’ privacy calculus: The PRICAL index development and validation," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 20-41.
    17. Gianluca Vagnani & Corrado Gatti & Luca Proietti, 2019. "A conceptual framework of the adoption of innovations in organizations: a meta-analytical review of the literature," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(4), pages 1023-1062, December.
    18. Giao, Ha Nam Khanh & Tuan, Huynh Quoc, 2021. "Intention To Buy Air Ticket Online of Vietnamese Consumers," OSF Preprints d5uh8, Center for Open Science.
    19. Carlo Drago & Andrea Gatto, 2022. "An interval‐valued composite indicator for energy efficiency and green entrepreneurship," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2107-2126, July.
    20. Giao, Ha Nam Khanh & Tuan, Huynh Quoc, 2021. "Intention To Buy Air Ticket Online Of Vietnamese Consumers," OSF Preprints 867s5, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gewipr:261546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gewisea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.