IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/gewipr/259322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy assessment and development by stakeholders: a cross-country analysis of national recommendation on organic farming policy in 11 European countries

Author

Listed:
  • Häring, A.M.
  • Vairo, D.
  • Dabbert, S.
  • Zanoli, R.

Abstract

There is no single 'best way' of policy development. Bottom-up approaches to policy design and a broad debate among stakeholders facilitate policy learning and innovation. A novel approach of a bottom-up policy design process involving stakeholders is introduced. First results obtained by this methodology are presented. The outcomes of an international effort for a development of policies for organic food and farming in Mai 2004 in Europe are analyzed: the synthesized results from 11 European countries (AT, CH, CZ, DE, DK, EE, GB, HU, IT, PL, SI) on the current situation of policies related to the organic food and farming sector in Europe are highlighted and policy recommendations for the development of the sector formulated. Specifically, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of policies related to organic food market are identified and policy instruments to address these aspects are developed.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Häring, A.M. & Vairo, D. & Dabbert, S. & Zanoli, R., 2007. "Policy assessment and development by stakeholders: a cross-country analysis of national recommendation on organic farming policy in 11 European countries," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 42, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:gewipr:259322
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.259322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/259322/files/Bd42Nr27.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.259322?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rose, Richard, 1991. "What is Lesson-Drawing?," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 3-30, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mr. Alex Segura-Ubiergo & Miss Taline Koranchelian & Mr. Carlos Mulas-Granados, 2008. "Reforming Government Subsidies in the New Member States of the European Union," IMF Working Papers 2008/165, International Monetary Fund.
    2. May-Britt Stumbaum, 2015. "The diffusion of norms in security-related fields: views from China, India and the EU," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 331-347, September.
    3. Vairo, Daniela & Haring, Anna Maria & Dabbert, Stephan & Zanoli, Raffaele, 2006. "Policies supporting organic food and farming in the EU: assessment and development by stakeholders in 11 European countries," 98th Seminar, June 29-July 2, 2006, Chania, Crete, Greece 10109, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Parker, David, 2001. "Economic Regulation: A Preliminary Literature Review and Summary of Research Questions Arising," Centre on Regulation and Competition (CRC) Working papers 30616, University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM).
    5. Gabriela de Carvalho, 2022. "The World Bank and Healthcare Reforms: A Cross‐National Analysis of Policy Prescriptions in South America," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 5-18.
    6. Raul Lejano & Savita Shankar, 2013. "The contextualist turn and schematics of institutional fit: Theory and a case study from Southern India," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 46(1), pages 83-102, March.
    7. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5404 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Haring, Anna Maria & Vairo, Daniela & Dabbert, Stephan & Zanoli, Raffaele, 2005. "Stakeholder Assessment of Agricultural Policies and Development of Policy Instruments: A Cross-country Synthesis of National Policy Workshops in 11 European Countries," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24654, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Cacace, Mirella & Ettelt, Stefanie & Mays, Nicholas & Nolte, Ellen, 2013. "Assessing quality in cross-country comparisons of health systems and policies: Towards a set of generic quality criteria," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 156-162.
    10. Parsons, Kelly & Lang, Tim & Barling, David, 2021. "London’s food policy: Leveraging the policy sub-system, programme and plan," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    11. Marsden, Greg & Stead, Dominic, 2011. "Policy transfer and learning in the field of transport: A review of concepts and evidence," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 492-500, May.
    12. Karoline Steinbacher, 2015. "Drawing Lessons When Objectives Differ? Assessing Renewable Energy Policy Transfer from Germany to Morocco," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(2), pages 34-50.
    13. Ugo Rizzo & Francesco Nicolli & Laura Ramaciotti, 2014. "The Heterogeneity of the Development Process of New Technology-Based Firms. Implication for Innovation Policies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 5(1), pages 114-132, March.
    14. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/5404 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Covadonga Meseguer, 2005. "Policy Learning, Policy Diffusion, and the Making of a New Order," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 598(1), pages 67-82, March.
    16. Gualmini, Elisabetta, 1996. "Policy innovation in the Italian labour market: the influence of institutions," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economic Change and Employment FS I 96-304, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    17. Peter J. May, 1999. "Fostering Policy Learning: A Challenge for Public Administration," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 21-31, June.
    18. Imran Zawwar & Shailesh Munankarmi, 2012. "International Policy Framework The Brand Personality," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 6(1), pages 101-112, December.
    19. Anna Lewczuk, 2021. "Are civil liberties contagious? Analysis of determinants of de facto civil rights protection in post-socialist countries," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 187-217, June.
    20. Palomo-Hierro, Sara & Loch, Adam & Pérez-Blanco, C. Dionisio, 2022. "Improving water markets in Spain: Lesson-drawing from the Murray-Darling Basin in Australia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    21. Caner Bakır, 2017. "Policy learning and policy change: learning from research citations," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(4), pages 585-597, December.
    22. Palina Prysmakova, 2015. "Breaking Iron Channels of International Learning: Adopting Meads Typolog y to the Seoul Metropolitan Government," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 5, pages 111-128.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gewipr:259322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gewisea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.