IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/erdnra/276099.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Moldovan Tax System on Local and Agriculture Sector Development: 25 Years of Experience and Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Criclivaia, Diana

Abstract

Moldova's transition from planned to market economy required a total reconstruction of the tax system structure, particularly: taxes, tax administration and legislation of tax matters. However, in practice, Moldovan tax system (MTS) was not able to solve the multitude of problems that occurred. This system is unfair as it hampers economic growth, applying half measures, and does not ensure state programs and services are efficient especially on agriculture sector. The legal economy was substituted with “shadow one” that gets alarming proportions until present. The largest share in total informal employment holds agricultural sector, and the main contribution belongs to households. Due to the specificity of this type of employment, 80% of informally employed people are working in rural areas, which is detrimental for an economy where about 55% of population lives in rural areas and almost 28% are employed in agriculture. The paper aims to reveal the weaknesses and strengths of MTS, related to evelopment on agriculture sector, considering several suggestions for most appropriate taxing culture changes (e.g. personalized VAT reform based on successful experience of Latin America).

Suggested Citation

  • Criclivaia, Diana, 2016. "Impact of Moldovan Tax System on Local and Agriculture Sector Development: 25 Years of Experience and Challenges," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 13, pages 1-24.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:erdnra:276099
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.276099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/276099/files/Criclivaia.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.276099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:idb:brikps:80759 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. World Bank, 2016. "Moldova Trade Study," World Bank Publications - Reports 24042, The World Bank Group.
    3. World Bank, 2016. "Moldova Trade Study," World Bank Publications - Reports 24007, The World Bank Group.
    4. Ana Corbacho & Vicente Fretes Cibils & Eduardo Lora (ed.), 2013. "More than Revenue," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-31597-7, October.
    5. World Bank, 2016. "Moldova Trade Study," World Bank Publications - Reports 24043, The World Bank Group.
    6. World Bank, 2016. "Moldova Trade Study," World Bank Publications - Reports 24006, The World Bank Group.
    7. Ceyhun Elgin & Oguz Oztunali, 2012. "Shadow Economies around the World: Model Based Estimates," Working Papers 2012/05, Bogazici University, Department of Economics.
    8. World Bank, 2016. "Moldova Trade Study," World Bank Publications - Reports 24005, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ummad Mazhar & Ceyhun Elgin, 2013. "Environmental Regulation, Pollution and the Informal Economy," SBP Research Bulletin, State Bank of Pakistan, Research Department, vol. 9, pages 62-81.
    2. Ceyhun Elgin & Orhan Torul & Tugce Turk, 2022. "Marginal Cost of Public Funds under the Presence of Informality," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 241(2), pages 79-103, June.
    3. Ceyhun Elgin & Ferda Erturk, 2016. "Is Informality a Barrier to Convergence?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(4), pages 2556-2568.
    4. Branimir Jovanovic, 2015. "Kalman Filter Estimation of the Unrecorded Economy in Macedonia," Working Papers 2015-02, National Bank of the Republic of North Macedonia.
    5. Labib Shami & Teddy Lazebnik, 2024. "Implementing Machine Learning Methods in Estimating the Size of the Non-observed Economy," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(4), pages 1459-1476, April.
    6. Hallerberg, Mark & Scartascini, Carlos, 2017. "Explaining changes in tax burdens in Latin America: Do politics trump economics?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 162-179.
    7. Owolabi, Adegboyega O. & Berdiev, Aziz N. & Saunoris, James W., 2022. "Is the shadow economy procyclical or countercyclical over the business cycle? International evidence," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 257-270.
    8. Peter A.G. van Bergeijk, 2013. "Earth Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14673.
    9. Castro, Lucio & Scartascini, Carlos, 2015. "Tax compliance and enforcement in the pampas evidence from a field experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 65-82.
    10. Ndoya, Hermann & Okere, Donald & Belomo, Marie laure & Atangana, Melissa, 2023. "Does ICTs decrease the spread of informal economy in Africa?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(2).
    11. Başbay, Mustafa Metin & Elgin, Ceyhun & Torul, Orhan, 2018. "Socio-demographics, political attitudes and informal sector employment: A cross-country analysis," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 556-568.
    12. Charles K. Mawusi, 2021. "Does Informality and Trade Openness Impact Long Run Growth? Empirical Evidence from Ghana," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 41(1), pages 28-40.
    13. Basbay, Mustafa Metin & Elgin, Ceyhun & Torul, Orhan, 2016. "Energy consumption and the size of the informal economy," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 10, pages 1-28.
    14. Tobón, A, 2021. "Economía formal y economía informal: un estudio sobre la dinámica del crecimiento económico en un modelo de inspiración clásica," Documentos de trabajo - Alianza EFI 19292, Alianza EFI.
    15. Goel, Rajeev K. & Saunoris, James W., 2014. "Military versus non-military government spending and the shadow economy," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 350-359.
    16. Piotr Dybka & Bartosz Olesiński & Marek Rozkrut & Andrzej Torój, 2023. "Measuring the model uncertainty of shadow economy estimates," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 30(4), pages 1069-1106, August.
    17. Aziz N. Berdiev & Brandon Gomes & James W. Saunoris, 2023. "Revisiting the nexus between globalisation and the shadow economy: Untying the influences of de jure versus de facto globalisation," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 27-54, January.
    18. Yu kun Wang & Li Zhang, 2021. "Underground economy and GDP growth: Evidence from China’s tax reforms," Journal of Tax Reform, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 7(1), pages 87-107.
    19. Pessino, Carola & Izquierdo, Alejandro & Vuletin, Guillermo, 2018. "Better Spending for Better Lives: How Latin America and the Caribbean Can Do More with Less," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 9152, November.
    20. Angel Melguizo, 2015. "Pensions, informality, and the emerging middle class," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 169-169, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:erdnra:276099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erdnnea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.