IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/eiapai/169774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic, Energy And Environmental Issues Of Agroenergy Chains. An Overview Of The Eu Agricultural Policy And The Concept Of “Multifunctionality”

Author

Listed:
  • Lanfranchi, Maurizio
  • Giannetto, Carlo
  • De Pascale, Angelina

Abstract

It is now widely acknowledged that almost all human activity is seriously dependent on energy produced from fossil fuels. Energy consumption is one of the most reliable indicators of the development and quality of life of a country and the need to satisfy the demand for energy over a certain time period is the basis of energy planning. The increasing demand for energy and the expected shortage in the long term solicit new strategies to fill the widening demand-supply gap. The European Commission intends to implement these strategies in a context where both environmental and social goals are considered. It is recognized that a sustainable strategy must be addressed to achieve, first of all, the following goals: guarantee the security of the energy market; minimize the environmental impact; avoid the social consequences of energy shortage; improve the quality of life in rural areas and encourage diversification of the rural economy. In recent years the RES based on agricultural production has rendered agriculture multifunctional in the context of the EU Agricultural Policy. In this view, awareness of the multifunctional character of agriculture can act as a useful means for identifying the importance of social, environmental and economic functions, and define the best balance between them. Bioenergy production, as a function of multifunctional agriculture, can be used so as to reduce to the minimum the impact on the environment; it can also, in rural or in developing areas, enhance employment and contribute to improving this balance.

Suggested Citation

  • Lanfranchi, Maurizio & Giannetto, Carlo & De Pascale, Angelina, 2013. "Economic, Energy And Environmental Issues Of Agroenergy Chains. An Overview Of The Eu Agricultural Policy And The Concept Of “Multifunctionality”," Politica Agricola Internazionale - International Agricultural Policy, Edizioni L'Informatore Agrario, vol. 2013(2), April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eiapai:169774
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.169774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/169774/files/Lanfranchi_et_al_2013.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.169774?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reijnders, L., 2006. "Conditions for the sustainability of biomass based fuel use," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 863-876, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ozsezen, Ahmet Necati & Canakci, Mustafa, 2011. "Performance and combustion characteristics of alcohol–gasoline blends at wide-open throttle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2747-2752.
    2. Adhikari, Suraj & Illukpitiya, Prabodh & Fisseha, Tegegne & Enefiok, Ekanem, 2017. "Comparative economic analysis of on-farm biodiesel production," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252766, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    3. Steubing, B. & Zah, R. & Waeger, P. & Ludwig, C., 2010. "Bioenergy in Switzerland: Assessing the domestic sustainable biomass potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(8), pages 2256-2265, October.
    4. Roesler, Tim & Hassler, Markus, 2019. "Creating niches – The role of policy for the implementation of bioenergy village cooperatives in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 95-101.
    5. Knauf, Marcus, 2016. "The wood market balance as a tool for calculating wood use's climate change mitigation effect — An example for Germany," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 18-21.
    6. Atadashi, I.M. & Aroua, M.K. & Aziz, A.R. Abdul & Sulaiman, N.M.N., 2011. "Refining technologies for the purification of crude biodiesel," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 4239-4251.
    7. Yaghoubi, Jafar & Yazdanpanah, Masoud & Komendantova, Nadejda, 2019. "Iranian agriculture advisors' perception and intention toward biofuel: Green way toward energy security, rural development and climate change mitigation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 452-459.
    8. Armenia Androniceanu & Oana Matilda Sabie, 2022. "Overview of Green Energy as a Real Strategic Option for Sustainable Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-35, November.
    9. Rahman, Farahiyah Abdul & Aziz, Md Maniruzzaman A. & Saidur, R. & Bakar, Wan Azelee Wan Abu & Hainin, M.R & Putrajaya, Ramadhansyah & Hassan, Norhidayah Abdul, 2017. "Pollution to solution: Capture and sequestration of carbon dioxide (CO2) and its utilization as a renewable energy source for a sustainable future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 112-126.
    10. Yoon, Su-Young & Kim, Byung-Ro & Han, Sim-Hee & Shin, Soo-Jeong, 2015. "Different response between woody core and bark of goat willow (Salix caprea L.) to concentrated phosphoric acid pretreatment followed by enzymatic saccharification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 21-26.
    11. Bakhtiyari, Ziba & Yazdanpanah, Masoud & Forouzani, Masoumeh & Kazemi, Navab, 2017. "Intention of agricultural professionals toward biofuels in Iran: Implications for energy security, society, and policy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 341-349.
    12. Markevicius, A. & Katinas, V. & Perednis, E. & Tamasauskiene, M., 2010. "Trends and sustainability criteria of the production and use of liquid biofuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3226-3231, December.
    13. Anuar, Mohd Razealy & Abdullah, Ahmad Zuhairi, 2016. "Challenges in biodiesel industry with regards to feedstock, environmental, social and sustainability issues: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 208-223.
    14. Abou-Shanab, Reda A.I. & Hwang, Jae-Hoon & Cho, Yunchul & Min, Booki & Jeon, Byong-Hun, 2011. "Characterization of microalgal species isolated from fresh water bodies as a potential source for biodiesel production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(10), pages 3300-3306.
    15. Chien, Taichen & Hu, Jin-Li, 2007. "Renewable energy and macroeconomic efficiency of OECD and non-OECD economies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 3606-3615, July.
    16. Sanyang, M.L. & Sapuan, S.M. & Jawaid, M. & Ishak, M.R. & Sahari, J., 2016. "Recent developments in sugar palm (Arenga pinnata) based biocomposites and their potential industrial applications: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 533-549.
    17. Milazzo, M.F. & Spina, F. & Cavallaro, S. & Bart, J.C.J., 2013. "Sustainable soy biodiesel," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 806-852.
    18. Tica, Slaven & Filipovic, Snezana & Zivanovic, Predrag & Milovanovic, Branko, 2010. "Test run of biodiesel in public transport system in Belgrade," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(11), pages 7014-7020, November.
    19. Uddin, Sk Noim & Barreto, Leonardo, 2007. "Biomass-fired cogeneration systems with CO2 capture and storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1006-1019.
    20. Buchholz, Thomas S. & Volk, Timothy A. & Luzadis, Valerie A., 2007. "A participatory systems approach to modeling social, economic, and ecological components of bioenergy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 6084-6094, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eiapai:169774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.informatoreagrario.it/ita/riviste/Pagri/index.asp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.