IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/eeaeje/343228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Welfare in Ethiopia: Growth Scenarios for Exiting Poverty

Author

Listed:
  • Goshu, Degye

Abstract

Poverty alleviation and equitable distribution of benefits among citizens are the overriding welfare objectives of developing countries. Ethiopia has been designing and implementing several development policies and interventions to attain such welfare objectives. However, poverty alleviation is still the primary development agenda of the country and the distribution of poverty across regions and population subgroups is becoming worrisome. In order to generate latest, relevant and reliable empirical evidence on these welfare issues, the third wave (2015) of the Living Standards Measurement Study (LSMS) dataset on Ethiopian was utilized. A sample of 4954 households with 22,296 household members covering all regions and cities were utilized for rigorous distributive analysis. FGT poverty indices and the time taken to exit poverty were estimated and decomposed by population subgroups and expenditure components. A right-censored Tobit model of welfare ratio was employed to identify the correlates of poverty and to predict the intensity and probability of poverty. The results of distributive analysis show that absolute poverty rate in Ethiopia was 22.1 percent with significant variation across regional states. Absolute poverty was also largely different by gender, place of residence (rural-urban), and religion. Similarly, depth and severity of poverty (6% and 2.4%) were varied across regions. Based on different growth scenarios of consumption expenditure per capita assumed (14%, 11%, 8%, and 5), the poor in Ethiopia would take 9.4-26.4 years to exit poverty. The Tobit model outputs indicated that the expected welfare ratio of the poor was 0.783, which was 21.3 percent far below the poverty line (ETB 14758). The likelihood of individuals to be poor was 22.0 percent, which is consistent to the FGT index (22.1%, about 22.1 million population). Poverty decomposition results show that absolute poverty rate in Ethiopia was highly attributable to rural areas (24.1%) with relative contribution of 88.5 percent compared to their counterparts in urban centers (12.7%). Similarly, decomposition of poverty by expenditure components verify that the absolute contribution of food consumption expenditure in reducing total poverty was 65.3 percent, whereas nonfood consumption expenditure contributed only 11.4 percent. The findings clearly suggest the need to design and implement relevant poverty reduction interventions for attaining Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) of ending poverty and hunger in all its forms by 2030.

Suggested Citation

  • Goshu, Degye, 2019. "Economic Welfare in Ethiopia: Growth Scenarios for Exiting Poverty," Ethiopian Journal of Economics, Ethiopian Economics Association, vol. 28(02), October.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eeaeje:343228
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.343228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/343228/files/Economic%20Welfare%20in%20Ethiopia.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.343228?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan Haughton & Shahidur R. Khandker, 2009. "Handbook on Poverty and Inequality," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 11985.
    2. Foster, James & Greer, Joel & Thorbecke, Erik, 1984. "A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 761-766, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eleftherios Giovanis & Oznur Ozdamar, 2021. "Regional employment support programs and multidimensional poverty of youth in Turkey," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(4), pages 583-609, December.
    2. Pinaki Das & Bibek Paria & Shama Firdaush, 2021. "Juxtaposing Consumption Poverty and Multidimensional Poverty: A Study in Indian Context," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 153(2), pages 469-501, January.
    3. Ye, Yuxiang & Koch, Steven F., 2021. "Measuring energy poverty in South Africa based on household required energy consumption," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    4. Nuno Crespo & Sandrina B. Moreira & Nadia Simoes, 2015. "Integrated Approach for the Measurement of Inequality, Poverty, and Richness," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 62(5), pages 531-555.
    5. Utz Pape & Philip Wollburg, 2019. "Estimation of Poverty in Somalia Using Innovative Methodologies," HiCN Working Papers 306, Households in Conflict Network.
    6. Wubneshe Dessalegn Biru & Manfred Zeller & Tim K. Loos, 2020. "The Impact of Agricultural Technologies on Poverty and Vulnerability of Smallholders in Ethiopia: A Panel Data Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 147(2), pages 517-544, January.
    7. Lei Zhao & Xin Xia, 2020. "Tourism and poverty reduction: Empirical evidence from China," Tourism Economics, , vol. 26(2), pages 233-256, March.
    8. Azeem, Muhammad Masood & Mugera, Amin W. & Schilizzi, Steven, 2016. "Poverty and vulnerability in the Punjab, Pakistan: A multilevel analysis," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 57-72.
    9. Stefano Marchetti & Maciej Beręsewicz & Nicola Salvati & Marcin Szymkowiak & Łukasz Wawrowski, 2018. "The use of a three‐level M‐quantile model to map poverty at local administrative unit 1 in Poland," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 181(4), pages 1077-1104, October.
    10. Vivien Kana Zeumo & Blaise Some & Alexis Tsoukiàs, 2011. "A survey on Multidimensional Poverty Measurement: a Decision Aiding Perspective," Working Papers hal-00875525, HAL.
    11. Cisse, Jennifer Denno & Barrett, Christopher B., 2015. "Resilience Measurement: A Moment-Based Approach to Resilience Identification and Aggregation," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205621, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Mekonnen, Daniel Ayalew & Gerber, Nicolas, 2016. "Aspirations and income, food security and subjective well-being in rural Ethiopia," Discussion Papers 234562, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    13. Fernandes, Cristina & Fernandes, Cristina & Crespo, Nuno & Simoes, Nadia, 2016. "Poverty, richness, and inequality: Evidence for Portugal using a housing comfort index," Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, IOS Press, issue 4, pages 371-394.
    14. Annim, Samuel Kobina & Mariwah, Simon & Sebu, Joshua, 2012. "Spatial inequality and household poverty in Ghana," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 487-505.
    15. Ward, Patrick S., 2016. "Transient Poverty, Poverty Dynamics, and Vulnerability to Poverty: An Empirical Analysis Using a Balanced Panel from Rural China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 541-553.
    16. Durgesh Chandra Pathak, 2010. "Poverty and Inequality in Uttar Pradesh during 1993-94 to 2004-05 A Decomposition Analysis," Development Economics Working Papers 23022, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    17. Branko Milanovic & Leonardo S. Oliveira & Debora F. De Souza & Luciana A. Dos Santos & Marta Antunes & Nícia C. H. Brendolin & Viviane C. C. Quintaes, 2016. "Construction of a Consumption Aggregate Based on Information from POF 2008-2009 and Its Use in the Measurement of Welfare, Poverty, Inequality and Vulnerability of Families," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 62, pages 179-210, August.
    18. Mauricio Gallardo, 2018. "Identifying Vulnerability To Poverty: A Critical Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 1074-1105, September.
    19. Ray C. Rist & Frederic P. Martin & Ana María Fernandez, 2016. "Poverty, Inequality, and Evaluation," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 22769.
    20. Tomáš Želinský, 2010. "Analýza chudoby na Slovensku založená na koncepte relatívnej deprivácie [Analysis of Poverty in Slovakia Based on the Concept of Relative Deprivation]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2010(4), pages 542-565.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eeaeje:343228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eeaa2ea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.