IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ccsesa/234995.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing the Effectiveness of Garlic (Allium sativum L.) and Hot Pepper (Capsicum frutescens L.) in the Management of the Major Pests of Cabbage Brassica oleracea (L.)

Author

Listed:
  • Baidoo, P. K.
  • Mochiah, M. B.

Abstract

The use of chemical insecticides in crop production has resulted in increased food production in Africa, but their use has resulted in the destruction of beneficial organisms and development of resistance by some insects to the insecticides. The effectiveness of garlic Allium sativum and hot pepper, Capsicum frutescens in controlling the pests of cabbage, Brassica oleracea was evaluated. These botanicals were compared with a standard chemical insecticide Attack® (Emamectin benzoate). The experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design, with 3 treatments and a control, each of which was replicated 3 times. Plutella xylostella, Brevicoryne brassicae, Hellula undalis and Trichoplusia ni were found on cabbage plants. Significantly fewer of them were found on the treated plants than the control plants. The use of the plant extracts resulted in a reduction in mortality ranging from 10.76% to 55.94%. Fewer natural enemies of B. brassicae were sampled on the insecticide-sprayed plots than the garlic and pepper-sprayed plots. The cost of protecting cabbage plants from insect infestation using Attack was higher than the botanicals. Garlic-treated plots recorded the highest cost: benefit ratio of 1:16 while Attack®-treated plots recorded the least of 1: 9.2. The control effects of the botanicals compared favourably with that of the chemical insecticides. Thus these botanicals can be used as substitutes to chemical insecticides.

Suggested Citation

  • Baidoo, P. K. & Mochiah, M. B., 2016. "Comparing the Effectiveness of Garlic (Allium sativum L.) and Hot Pepper (Capsicum frutescens L.) in the Management of the Major Pests of Cabbage Brassica oleracea (L.)," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(2).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ccsesa:234995
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.234995
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/234995/files/P7-p83-91.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.234995?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patrick Maada Ngegba & Gaofeng Cui & Muhammad Zaryab Khalid & Guohua Zhong, 2022. "Use of Botanical Pesticides in Agriculture as an Alternative to Synthetic Pesticides," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Nelson Mpumi & Revocatus S. Machunda & Kelvin M. Mtei & Patrick A. Ndakidemi, 2020. "Selected Insect Pests of Economic Importance to Brassica oleracea , Their Control Strategies and the Potential Threat to Environmental Pollution in Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Angela G. Mkindi & Richard Coe & Philip C. Stevenson & Patrick A. Ndakidemi & Steven R. Belmain, 2021. "Qualitative Cost-Benefit Analysis of Using Pesticidal Plants in Smallholder Crop Protection," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, October.
    4. Agbor, David T. & OBEN, Tom T. & Afoh, Lesly T. & Eboh, Kizito S. & Kum, Yanik F. & Fon, Collins T. & Dohnji, John D., 2022. "Comparative Study Of Botanicals And Synthetic Insecticide On The Control Of Insect Pests And Diseases Of Cowpea," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 8(2), May.
    5. Santoshi Malla & Uttam Rosyara & Bibash Neupane & Birat Sapkota, 2021. "Feasibility Study Of Organic Vegetable Farming In Baitadi District," Food and Agri Economics Review (FAER), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 1(2), pages 88-92, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ccsesa:234995. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ccsenet.org/sar .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.