IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ccsesa/230296.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge and Innovations for Farmers from Teaching Agriculture in Ugandan Primary Schools: A Study of Kumi Communities in the Teso Sub-Region

Author

Listed:
  • Epeju, William Faustine

Abstract

Kumi communities consist of Bukedea, Kumi and Ngora districts whose agriculture is increasingly complex with declining productivity because of population increase, climate change, low yielding technologies used & poor market access impacting negatively on yields and environment. More knowledge & innovations are needed by farmers. Teaching agriculture in primary schools raised hopes, hence the study. The design was exploratory. In-depth interviews, focus group discussions, questionnaires, documents and observations were used to collect data from 40 primary schools randomly selected. Of 2,069 respondents, 1,951 were head teachers, teachers and primary seven students & 118 were farmers including extension workers purposively selected. Qualitative data were analysed using open coding & axial coding based on objectives and research questions. Agricultural productivity and its growth rate were found low caused by many factors. Education quality and innovations attained by farmers were not assuring for successful farming and rural living. Primary school agriculture was poorly conducted encountering implementation problems such as limited land, no funds, unfavourable weather and lack of improved inputs. Forty five percent (45%) of the students preferred farming as an occupation. The key innovations attained were literacy and numeracy important in the use of improved inputs; knowledge and skills for several farm operations including environmental management and good family living. On ranking school completion rates and farm output of 16 sub-counties, Spearman Rank Order coefficient computed was positive (r = 0.421 with r2 = 0.1772, 18% at 0.05 α). Increased farm output was explained by 18% through completed primary education by farmers. Smallholder farms in Kumi for years may only be run commercially through intelligent and differentiated policies, addressing market access, jobs in non-farm economy and social transfers to improve welfare of the poor. Primary school agriculture through innovations attained by farmers enhances production thus the need for more investment in it.

Suggested Citation

  • Epeju, William Faustine, 2016. "Knowledge and Innovations for Farmers from Teaching Agriculture in Ugandan Primary Schools: A Study of Kumi Communities in the Teso Sub-Region," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ccsesa:230296
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.230296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/230296/files/P6-p56-69.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.230296?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rigby, D. & Caceres, D., 2001. "Organic farming and the sustainability of agricultural systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 21-40, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Raimondo & Francesco Caracciolo & Concetta Nazzaro & Giuseppe Marotta, 2021. "Organic Farming Increases the Technical Efficiency of Olive Farms in Italy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Siegmeier, Torsten & Möller, Detlev, 2013. "Mapping research at the intersection of organic farming and bioenergy — A scientometric review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 197-204.
    3. Rigby, Dan & Woodhouse, Phil & Young, Trevor & Burton, Michael, 2001. "Constructing a farm level indicator of sustainable agricultural practice," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 463-478, December.
    4. Adam Kleofas Berbeć & Beata Feledyn-Szewczyk & Christian Thalmann & Rebekka Wyss & Jan Grenz & Jerzy Kopiński & Jarosław Stalenga & Paweł Radzikowski, 2018. "Assessing the Sustainability Performance of Organic and Low-Input Conventional Farms from Eastern Poland with the RISE Indicator System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Arpaphan Pattanapant & Ganesh P. Shivakoti, 2009. "Opportunities and constraints of organic agriculture in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand," Asia-Pacific Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 16(1), pages 115-147, June.
    6. Maria Fitzner & Anna Fricke & Monika Schreiner & Susanne Baldermann, 2021. "Utilization of Regional Natural Brines for the Indoor Cultivation of Salicornia europaea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-12, November.
    7. A. A. H. (Arnoud) Smit & Peter P. J. Driessen & Pieter Glasbergen, 2008. "Constraints on the conversion to sustainable production: the case of the Dutch potato chain," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(6), pages 369-381, September.
    8. Giuseppe Coppola & Michele Costantini & Luigi Orsi & Davide Facchinetti & Francesco Santoro & Domenico Pessina & Jacopo Bacenetti, 2020. "A Comparative Cost-Benefit Analysis of Conventional and Organic Hazelnuts Production Systems in Center Italy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, September.
    9. Klaas Calker & Paul Berentsen & Gerard Giesen & Ruud Huirne, 2005. "Identifying and ranking attributes that determine sustainability in Dutch dairy farming," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 22(1), pages 53-63, March.
    10. van Calker, Klaas Jan & Antink, Rudi H.J. Hooch & Beldman, Alfons C.G. & Mauser, Anniek, 2005. "Caring Dairy: A Sustainable Dairy Farming Initiative in Europe," 15th Congress, Campinas SP, Brazil, August 14-19, 2005 24234, International Farm Management Association.
    11. Michal Skalský & Jana Ouředníčková & Jana Niedobová & Bronislava Hortová, 2020. "Efficacy of agrochemicals against Phyllobius oblongus," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 56(2), pages 116-122.
    12. Cecilia Katzeff & Rebecka Milestad & Jorge Luis Zapico & Ulrica Bohné, 2020. "Encouraging Organic Food Consumption through Visualization of Personal Shopping Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, April.
    13. Marcos Ferasso & Miguel Blanco & Lydia Bares, 2021. "Territorial Analysis of the European Rural Development Funds (ERDF) as a Driving Factor of Ecological Agricultural Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, October.
    14. Burton, Michael P. & Rigby, Dan & Young, Trevor, 2003. "Modelling the adoption of organic horticultural technology in the UK using Duration Analysis," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 47(1), pages 1-26, March.
    15. Qudratullah Oryakhil & Mohammad Arif Irfan, 2020. "Morphological Biochemical And Plant Growth Promoting Charac terization Of Rhizobia Isolated From Root Nodule Of Cicer Arietinum," Tropical Agroecosystems (TAEC), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 1(2), pages 59-63, July.
    16. Rasul, Golam & Thapa, Gopal B., 2003. "Sustainability Analysis of Ecological and Conventional Agricultural Systems in Bangladesh," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(10), pages 1721-1741, October.
    17. Agnieszka Wojewódzka-Wiewiórska & Anna Kłoczko-Gajewska & Piotr Sulewski, 2019. "Between the Social and Economic Dimensions of Sustainability in Rural Areas—In Search of Farmers’ Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    18. Hvitsand, Christine & Raanaas, Ruth Kjærsti & Gjøtterud, Sigrid & Nicolaysen, Anna Marie, 2022. "Establishing an Agri-food living lab for sustainability transitions: Methodological insight from a case of strengthening the niche of organic vegetables in the Vestfold region in Norway," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    19. Liu, Chia-Yi & Hsieh & Chen-Yu, 2023. "How does Organic Agriculture Contribute to Sustainable Development? Organic Agriculture in Taiwan," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 14(03), September.
    20. Mohamed Gafsi & Jean-Luc Favreau, 2014. "Diversity of operating logics and sustainability of organic farms [Diversité des logiques de fonctionnement et durabilité des exploitations en agriculture biologique]," Post-Print hal-02076167, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ccsesa:230296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ccsenet.org/sar .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.