IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/auagre/335260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Benefits of Dry Ageing of Mutton to the Australian Sheep Meat Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Griffith, Garry
  • Jacob, Robin
  • Mounter, Stuart
  • Zhang, Yue

Abstract

There is a very large volume of low-value mutton produced in Australia and there have been suggestions that there are value adding opportunities that could improve the returns of sheep meat producers and value chain partners. Dry ageing is one technology being trialled to improve mutton eating quality and so attract premiums from consumer segments with high willingness to pay for guaranteed quality. The objective of this analysis is to estimate the industry-wide benefits of the adoption of dry ageing technology in the Australian mutton market, using assumptions that reflect the most likely ways the technology would be scaled up and most likely supplier and consumer responses in the relevant market segments. A new model of the Australian sheep meat market was used to undertake some scenario analyses about the costs of supplying dry aged mutton ready for delivery to butchers or the hotel, restaurant and institution sector, the size of the target market, and the willingness to pay by consumers for dry aged mutton. While there are already well-established businesses selling aged meat and there may be other small niche markets where the dry aging technology is profitable, the key result is that only under the most optimistic scenario examined would the implementation of dry ageing of mutton lead to positive industry-wide benefits. For our assumed most likely combination of costs and returns, the loss is around $34,000 per year. This loss is doubled in the pessimistic scenario, and in the optimistic scenario the loss turns into a very small positive return of some $3,600 per year. Sheep farmers gain in all scenarios, but these gains are outweighed in many scenarios by losses to value chain partners (processors, retailers and exporters) and consumers in domestic and export markets. Further experimental work which attempts to better quantify the annual operating cost of the proposed large dry ageing cabinets that ensure quality and the minimisation of moisture loss, and the actual willingness of consumers to pay for mutton of different qualities, in a store setting, may alter this conclusion in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Griffith, Garry & Jacob, Robin & Mounter, Stuart & Zhang, Yue, 2021. "The Benefits of Dry Ageing of Mutton to the Australian Sheep Meat Industry," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 29(3), May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:auagre:335260
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.335260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/335260/files/AAR-Vol-29-Paper-3-Griffith-et-al.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.335260?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhao, Xueyan & Griffiths, William E. & Griffith, Garry R. & Mullen, John D., 2000. "Probability distributions for economic surplus changes: the case of technical change in the Australian wool industry," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 44(1), pages 1-24.
    2. Slattery, Henry & Griffith, Garry R. & Malcolm, Bill & Dunshea, Frank, 2010. "The benefits to the Australian Pig meat industry from an increase in demand for a hypothetical low cholesterol pork product," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 18, pages 1-9.
    3. Hill, D. J. & Piggott, R. R. & Griffith, G. R., 2001. "Profitability of incremental generic promotion of Australian dairy products," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 253-266, December.
    4. Griffith, Garry R., 2009. "Estimating the economic impact of a major beef industry research and development investment," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 17, pages 1-24.
    5. Farquharson, Robert J. & Griffith, Garry R. & Barwick, Steve & Banks, Rob & Holmes, Bill, 2003. "Estimating the Returns from Past Investment into Beef Cattle Genetic Technologies in Australia," Research Reports 28009, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    6. Griffith, Garry R. & Malcolm, Bill & Mounter, Stuart W. & Slattery, Henry, 2010. "Old model, new problem: when should you update a model and what happens when you do?," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 18, pages 1-16.
    7. Mounter, Stuart & Zhang, Yue & Griffith, Garry, 2019. "Calibrating and Validating an Equilibrium Displacement Model of the Australian Sheep Meat Industry," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 27(5).
    8. Mounter, Stuart W. & Griffith, Garry R. & Piggott, Roley R., 2005. "The Payoff from Generic Advertising by the Australian Pig Industry in the Presence of Trade," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 13.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vere, David T. & Griffith, Garry R. & Silvester, Luke T., 2005. "Australian Sheep Industry CRC: Economic Evaluations of Scientific Research Programs," Research Reports 42651, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    2. Lana Awada & Peter W. B. Phillips, 2021. "The distribution of returns from land efficiency improvement in multistage production systems," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 69(1), pages 73-92, March.
    3. Griffith, Garry & Zhanga, Yue & Mounter, Stuart, 2022. "Economic Evaluation of the ALMTech R&D program," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 30(1), April.
    4. Mounter, Stuart W. & Griffith, Garry R., 2011. "A pig in a poke? Accounting for uncertainty about elasticity values in an EDM of the Australian pig industry," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 19, pages 1-9.
    5. Griffith, G.R. & Pollock, K.S. & Burrow, H.M., 2013. "How Did We Go? Revisiting the Ex Ante Economic Impact Assessment of the CRC for Beef Genetic Technologies, as at the Cessation of Funding," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 21, pages 1-18.
    6. Rohr, Sarah & Mounter, Stuart & Fleming, Euan & Griffith, Garry, 2020. "A Diagrammatic Framework for Accounting for Externalities in Agriculture and Food Sector Value Chains," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 28(5), December.
    7. Julian M. Alston & John W. Freebairn & Jennifer S. James, 2003. "Distributional issues in check-off funded programs," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(3), pages 277-287.
    8. Dent, Siobahn K. & Piggott, Roley R. & O'Donnell, Christopher J. & Griffith, Garry R., 2003. "Does Excluding Cross-commodity Interactions Matter? Beef and Lamb in Australia," 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia 57859, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    9. Naseem, Anwar & Singla, Rohit, 2013. "Ex Ante Economic Impact Analysis of Novel Traits in Canola," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 38(2), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Henry W. Kinnucan & Øystein Myrland, 2003. "Free-rider effects of generic advertising: The case of salmon," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(3), pages 315-324.
    11. Borrell, Brent & Jiang, Tingsong & Pearce, David & Gould, Ian, 2014. "Payoffs from research and development along the Australian food value chain: a general equilibrium analysis," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 58(3), July.
    12. Falck-Zepeda, Jose & Horna, Daniela & Smale, Melinda, 2007. "The economic impact and the distribution of benefits and risk from the adoption of insect resistant (Bt) cotton in West Africa," IFPRI discussion papers 718, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    13. Griffith, Garry R. & Parnell, Peter F. & McKiernan, William A., 2005. "The Economic, Environmental and Social Benefits to NSW from Investment in the CRC for Beef Genetics Technologies," Research Reports 42654, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    14. Mounter, Stuart W. & Griffith, Garry R. & Mullen, John D., 2008. "Jointly selecting for fibre diameter and fleece weight: A market-level assessment of the QPLU$ Merino breeding project," 2008 Conference (52nd), February 5-8, 2008, Canberra, Australia 6046, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    15. Derek Baker & Kanar Dizyee & Warren Parker & Frank Scrimgeour & Garry Griffith, 2017. "Primary Industry Chains and Networks: Analysis for Public and Private Interests," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(6), pages 699-709, November.
    16. Salhofer, Klaus & Schmid, Erwin & Streicher, Gerhard & Schneider, Friedrich, 2003. "Testing For Efficiency: A Policy Analysis With Probability Distributions," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25891, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Freebairn, John W. & Goddard, Ellen W. & Griffith, Garry R., 2005. "When Can a Generic Advertising Program Increase Farmer Returns?," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 13.
    18. Takeshima, Hiroyuki, 2009. "Sensitivity of welfare effects estimated by equilibrium displacement model: a biological productivity growth for semi-subsistence crop in Sub-Sahara African market with high transactions costs," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49287, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Vere, David T. & Jones, Randall E. & Dowling, Peter, 2004. "An Economic Evaluation of Research into the Improved Management of the Annual Grass Weed Vulpia in Temperate Pastures in South-Eastern Australia," Research Reports 42503, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    20. repec:zbw:inwedp:432009 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Griffith, Garry R., 2009. "Estimating the economic impact of a major beef industry research and development investment," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 17, pages 1-24.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Livestock Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:auagre:335260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.agrifood.info/review/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.