IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/auagre/126188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Types of B2B E-Business Model Commonly Used: An Empirical Study On Australian Agribusines Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Ng, Eric

Abstract

This paper explores the various B2B e-business models commonly used using in-depth interviews and case studies conducted with Australian agribusiness firms. There is an apparent need to rethink the types of e-business models to be adopted as businesses make their transition toward the electronic environment. This is particularly evident in the B2B market where e-business has seen a significant growth. From the analysis, 10 B2B e-business models were identified with seven of them regarded as commonly used by agribusiness firms. Furthermore, rationales on the adoption of these models were also discussed and comparisons were made based on organisational size, industry sector and the current state of e-business model adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Ng, Eric, 2005. "Types of B2B E-Business Model Commonly Used: An Empirical Study On Australian Agribusines Firms," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 13.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:auagre:126188
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.126188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/126188/files/Ng.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.126188?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tabasom Saberi & Abbas Khodadadi & Hamid Saeedi, 2020. "The Proposal of an Electronic Business Model in Agriculture Case Study: The Orchard Products in Isfahan Province," Paradigm, , vol. 24(1), pages 22-40, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:auagre:126188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.agrifood.info/review/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.