IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/auagre/125730.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land repair fund: a model for exploiting the nexus between land repair, improved production and profit

Author

Listed:
  • Leake, John E.
  • Morison, Julian B.

Abstract

Typically, the techniques used by the best farm managers to improve productivity are correlated with actions that address land and water degradation issues, thus establishing a nexus between land repair, improved production and profit. To address broader environmental degradation issues, there are a number of programs through which landholders can voluntarily conserve areas of ecological value on their properties. They range from non-binding, temporary agreements to binding agreements that are attached perpetually to the title of the land. There are other ecosystem values for which incentives are being developed, for example, salinity, carbon sequestration and amenity purposes and often there is a range of these that may be applicable to a particular land area. This paper overviews some of the existing revolving fund schemes that have been implemented or are currently being tested in Australia, considers the payment of landholders for providing ecosystem services and then provides details on a case study of one type of revolving fund, the Land Repair Fund.

Suggested Citation

  • Leake, John E. & Morison, Julian B., 2008. "Land repair fund: a model for exploiting the nexus between land repair, improved production and profit," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 16.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:auagre:125730
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.125730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/125730/files/Leake_Morison_1_.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.125730?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sadras, Victor & Roget, David & Krause, Mike, 2003. "Dynamic cropping strategies for risk management in dry-land farming systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 929-948, June.
    2. Stefan Hajkowicz (Ed) & Mike Young (Ed), 2002. "Value of Returns to Land and Water and Costs of Degradation Vol 1 of 2," Natural Resource Management Economics 02_002, Policy and Economic Research Unit, CSIRO Land and Water, Adelaide, Australia.
    3. Jeffery Connor & Brett Bryan, 2005, 2005. "River Murray Dryland Corridor Revegetation Policy Options. Stage 1 Report for the River Murray Dryland Corridor Project," Natural Resource Management Economics 05_002, Policy and Economic Research Unit, CSIRO Land and Water, Adelaide, Australia.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John E. Leake, 2021. "Investment in Land Restoration: New Perspectives with Special Reference to Australia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gavan Dwyer & Robert Douglas & Deb Peterson & Jo Chong & Kate Maddern, 2006. "Irrigation externalities: pricing and charges," Staff Working Papers 0603, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia.
    2. Murray, Francisco & Baldi, Germán & von Bernard, Tamara & Viglizzo, Ernesto Francisco & Jobbágy, Esteban Gabriel, 2016. "Productive performance of alternative land covers along aridity gradients: Ecological, agronomic and economic perspectives," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 20-29.
    3. Ramírez-Rodrigues, Melissa A. & Alderman, Phillip D. & Stefanova, Lydia & Cossani, C. Mariano & Flores, Dagoberto & Asseng, Senthold, 2016. "The value of seasonal forecasts for irrigated, supplementary irrigated, and rainfed wheat cropping systems in northwest Mexico," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 76-86.
    4. Le Gal, P.-Y. & Dugué, P. & Faure, G. & Novak, S., 2011. "How does research address the design of innovative agricultural production systems at the farm level? A review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(9), pages 714-728.
    5. Owusu–Kodua, Derrick & Micheels, Eric & Brown, Bill, 2017. "Pr - The Effect Of Entreprenurial Orientation On Crop Portfolio Choice: Results From A Student Simulation," 21st Congress, Edinburgh, Scotland, July 2-7, 2017 345779, International Farm Management Association.
    6. Srijita Ghosh & Kausik Gupta, 2023. "Dynamic Analysis of Watershed Management and Sustainable Agriculture in Dryland Regions: A Case Study of Purulia District, West Bengal," Review of Development and Change, , vol. 28(2), pages 207-244, December.
    7. Venn, Tyron J., 2005. "Financial and economic performance of long-rotation hardwood plantation investments in Queensland, Australia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 437-454, March.
    8. García-Alonso, Carlos R. & Torres-Jiménez, Mercedes & Hervás-Martínez, César, 2010. "Income prediction in the agrarian sector using product unit neural networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(2), pages 355-365, July.
    9. Nethononda, L. O. & Odhiambo, J.J. O & Paterson, D G, 2013. "Indigenous Knowledge of Climatic Conditions for Sustainable Crop Production under Resource-Poor Farming Conditions Using Participatory Techniques," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 2(1).
    10. Omid Bozorg-Haddad & Samaneh Sohrabi & Mohammad Delpasand & Hugo A. Loáiciga, 2021. "Dryland farming improvement by considering the relation between rainfall variability and crop yield," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 5316-5327, April.
    11. Greijdanus, Auke & Kragt, Marit Ellen, 2014. "The Grains Industry: An overview of the Australian broad-acre cropping," Working Papers 164256, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    12. Monjardino, Marta & McBeath, T. & Brennan, Lisa E. & Llewellyn, Rick S., 2012. "Are farmers in low-rainfall cropping regions under-fertilizing? An Australian case-study," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 124976, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Puech, Camille & Brulaire, Arnaud & Paraiso, Jérôme & Faloya, Vincent, 2021. "Collective design of innovative agroecological cropping systems for the industrial vegetable sector," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    14. Jeffery Connor, 2003. "Reducing the cost of South Australia of achieving agreed salinity targets in the River Murray," Natural Resource Management Economics 03_005, Policy and Economic Research Unit, CSIRO Land and Water, Adelaide, Australia.
    15. Monjardino, Marta & McBeath, T. & Brennan, Lisa E. & Llewellyn, Rick S., 2012. "Revisiting N fertilisation rates in low-rainfall grain cropping regions of Australia: A risk analysis," 2012 Conference (56th), February 7-10, 2012, Fremantle, Australia 124339, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    16. Passioura, John, 2006. "Increasing crop productivity when water is scarce--from breeding to field management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 80(1-3), pages 176-196, February.
    17. Hutchings, Timothy R. & Nordblom, Thomas L., 2011. "A financial analysis of the effect of the mix of crop and sheep enterprises on the risk profile of dryland farms in south-eastern Australia," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 8(1), pages 1-23, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:auagre:125730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.agrifood.info/review/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.