IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/316827.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk analysis of companies’ activities on the basis of non-financial and financial statements

Author

Listed:
  • Nazarova, Karina
  • Bezverkhyi, Kostiantyn
  • Hordopolov, Volodymyr
  • Melnyk, Tetiana
  • Poddubna, Natalіia

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the article is to study the degree of disclosure of information about the risks of economic activity of enterprises in non-financial statements and to find ways to improve the organization and methods of analysis of such risks based on the financial statements of companies. Methodology / approach. The methodological basis of the study is a systematic approach, methods of generalization, comparison, abstraction, analysis, synthesis, induction and deduction, bibliometric analysis, cluster analysis, as well as methods of integrated economic analysis. The publications from the Scopus database, for 1988–01.04.2021, processed by VOSviewer software were the source of data for bibliographic and cluster analysis. The materials of the research on the state of disclosure of information about the risks of domestic enterprises of the food industry are based on their financial statements and management report. Results. The article analyzes the state and degree of disclosure of information about the risks of economic activity in non-financial reports of domestic food industry enterprises. It is established that the enterprises of the studied industry most often provide information about the following risks: economic, currency, financial, political, legal, judicial, interest, personnel, price, commercial, as well as liquidity risk and market risk. Originality / scientific novelty. Theoretical, methodological and organizational principles of risk analysis of companies based on non-financial and financial reports have been further developed. For the first time, we proposed our own approach to the methodology of analysis of such risks, based on financial reporting indicators. In particular, such analytical indicators include: financial risk – solvency, financial leverage; credit risk – investment coverage ratio, return on equity, return on assets; liquidity risk – coverage ratio, quick liquidity ratio, absolute liquidity ratio. Practical value / implications. The practical value of the research is that the results obtained by the authors will contribute to the disclosure of information about the risks of economic activity of enterprises in non-financial statements. Analysis of the status and level of disclosure of information about the risks of domestic food industry enterprises in non-financial reports showed that most companies provided information about the following risks: economic, currency, financial, political, legal, judicial, interest, personnel, price, commercial, and risk liquidity and the risk of changes in market conditions. As a result, the author’s methodological approach to the analysis of internal risks of the studied industry (credit, financial risks, liquidity risk) is proposed. The proposed methodology is based on the indicators of financial reporting and is part of a comprehensive risk analysis of the enterprise for the purposes of the risk management system.

Suggested Citation

  • Nazarova, Karina & Bezverkhyi, Kostiantyn & Hordopolov, Volodymyr & Melnyk, Tetiana & Poddubna, Natalіia, 2021. "Risk analysis of companies’ activities on the basis of non-financial and financial statements," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 7(4), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:316827
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.316827
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/316827/files/10_Nazarova_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.316827?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrade e Silva, J. M. & Centeno, M. de Lourdes, 2017. "Ratemaking Of Dependent Risks," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(3), pages 875-894, September.
    2. Katarina Valaskova & Tomas Kliestik & Maria Kovacova, 2018. "Management of financial risks in Slovak enterprises using regression analysis," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 9(1), pages 105-121, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaromir VRBKA & Vojtech STEHEL, 2019. "The Issue Of Multicriteria Decision-Making: Model Example Of Business Partner Risk Assessment," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(1), pages 738-749, November.
    2. Michal Varmus & Martin Mičiak & Dominika Toman & Michal Jastraban & Matej Kuljovský & Jozef Sobol & Ivo Tongel & Andrea Zahumenská, 2025. "Athletes’ Education for Their Successful Future Career After Sports—Perspective of Former Athletes and Potential Employers," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Gheorghe H. POPESCU & George LĂZĂROIU & Maria KOVACOVA & Katarina VALASKOVA & Jana MAJEROVA, 2020. "Urban Sustainability Analytics: Harnessing Big Data For Smart City Planning And Design," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(2), pages 39-48, May.
    4. Meng-Meng Tan & Dong-Ling Xu & Jian-Bo Yang, 2022. "Corporate Failure Risk Assessment for Knowledge-Intensive Services Using the Evidential Reasoning Approach," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-29, March.
    5. Rafael Becerra-Vicario & David Alaminos & Eva Aranda & Manuel A. Fernández-Gámez, 2020. "Deep Recurrent Convolutional Neural Network for Bankruptcy Prediction: A Case of the Restaurant Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, June.
    6. Muhammad Asif Khan & Hossam Haddad & Mahmoud Odeh & Ahsanuddin Haider & Mohammed Arshad Khan, 2022. "Institutions, Culture, or Interaction: What Determines the Financial Market Development in Emerging Markets?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-23, November.
    7. Bojan Obrenovic & Jianguo Du & Danijela Godinic & Diana Tsoy & Muhammad Aamir Shafique Khan & Ilimdorjon Jakhongirov, 2020. "Sustaining Enterprise Operations and Productivity during the COVID-19 Pandemic: “Enterprise Effectiveness and Sustainability Model”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-27, July.
    8. Abraham Puente De La Vega Caceres, 2024. "Drivers of Value Creation and the Effect of ESG Risk Rating on Investor Perceptions through Financial Metrics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-21, June.
    9. Skvarciany Viktorija & Germanaitė Laura, 2019. "Financial Risk Assessment: Case of „Lietuvos Geležinkeliai“, AB," Open Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 19-29, January.
    10. Gintare Giriūniene & Lukas Giriūnas & Mangirdas Morkunas & Laura Brucaite, 2019. "A Comparison on Leading Methodologies for Bankruptcy Prediction: The Case of the Construction Sector in Lithuania," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Xiaoshun Qin & Dongdong Jiang & Leon Pretorius, 2021. "The Impact of Financial Factors on the After-Sales Service of Agricultural Machinery: A Case Study of Chinese Agricultural Machinery in South Africa," Asian Journal of Agriculture and rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 11(1), pages 71-78, March.
    12. Marjaneh Jahangiri Lahkani & Shouyang Wang & Mariusz Urbański & Mariya Egorova, 2020. "Sustainable B2B E-Commerce and Blockchain-Based Supply Chain Finance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, May.
    13. Veronika MACHOVA & Jakub HORAK, 2019. "Gdp As A Risk Factor Of Czech Enterprises," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(1), pages 785-798, November.
    14. Jaroslaw Kaczmarek & Sergio Luis Nanez Alonso & Andrzej Sokolowski & Kamil Fijorek & Sabina Denkowska, 2021. "Financial threat profiles of industrial enterprises in Poland," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(2), pages 463-498, June.
    15. Jaroslav Mazanec & Viera Bartosova, 2021. "Prediction Model as Sustainability Tool for Assessing Financial Status of Non-Profit Organizations in the Slovak Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    16. Leonardo Badea & Daniel Ştefan Armeanu & Dan Costin Nițescu & Valentin Murgu & Iulian Panait & Boris Kuzman, 2020. "A Study of the Relative Stock Market Performance of Companies Recognized for Supporting Gender Equality Policies and Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Violeta Sima & Ileana Georgiana Gheorghe & Jonel Subić & Dumitru Nancu, 2020. "Influences of the Industry 4.0 Revolution on the Human Capital Development and Consumer Behavior: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-28, May.
    18. Jaroslav Mazanec & Viera Bartosova & Patrik Bohm, 2022. "Logit Model for Estimating Non-Profit Organizations’ Financial Status as a Part of Non-Profit Financial Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-18, June.
    19. Sani Alfred Ilemona, "undated". "Income smoothing and performances of enterprises: A study of manufacturing firms in Nigeria," Review of Socio - Economic Perspectives 202222, Reviewsep.
    20. Sorin Gabriel Anton & Anca Elena Afloarei Nucu, 2020. "Enterprise Risk Management: A Literature Review and Agenda for Future Research," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Financial Economics; Risk and Uncertainty;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:316827. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.