IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/313636.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Controlling, monitoring and diagnostics in identifying effective management practices of agricultural enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Fedicheva, Krystyna
  • Kochetkov, Oleksii
  • Honcharenko, Stanislav
  • Levkina, Ruslana
  • Bichevin, Maksym

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the study – taking into account the functional load of the system of controlling, monitoring and diagnostics, to determine a methodical approach to performance control in the process of monitoring production parameters of agricultural enterprises’ functioning and diagnosing problematic aspects of financial and economic results to justify management decisions when planning promising production programs. Methodology / approach. Studies were conducted on the basis of general scientific methods (in the study of the theoretical basis of the functions of controlling, monitoring, and diagnostics of management activities in ensuring the effectiveness of management decisions in planning the sown areas structure), abstract-logical (to generalize the influence features of intensive crops use degree on the effectiveness of the grain direction of agricultural enterprises), economic and mathematical (to identify the optimal strategy in terms of information uncertainty in the agricultural enterprise management associated with the presence of faintly structured problems), statistical methods (statistical solutions theories for modeling the mechanism of crops interaction in given conditions of natural resources), and constructive (determining the method of substantiation of optimal resources flows and results of activities in order to maximize the profitability in the condition of the constancy of the resource base). The methodological basis in processing material is the dialectical method of social and economic phenomena perception. Results. In the course of the research, the conditions of formation of effective system of agriculture entities and diagnostics prerequisites of possible management actions to ensure sustainable profitability were analyzed. It is established that a critical increase in the sunflower share in crops is a reactive behavior of management practice in the conditions of the Luhansk region. The dependence of management decisions on planning the structure of sown areas by the perception of favorable economic conditions is proved according to the diagnostic analysis. The main parameters of statistical modeling for the implementation of diagnostic functions for identifying probable management actions in ensuring sustainable profitability of enterprises are determined. Originality / scientific novelty. The scientific novelty of the presented research is to improve the methodological approach to the implementation of controlling, monitoring and diagnostic functions in the process of substantiation of a promising production program of an agricultural enterprise in these conditions, which, unlike existing ones, is based on the methodology of statistical decision theory, high financial and economic efficiency in the study of information (parameters) about the technological discipline, which has no clear mathematical (regression) relationship. Practical value / implications. As a promising task for the development of the system of controlling, monitoring and diagnostics, it is determined the formation of mechanisms for programming the development of grain farming as the main specialization direction in the steppe conditions of Luhansk region on the principles of sectoral competitiveness, which will partially eliminate the reactivity of the management system of agricultural enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Fedicheva, Krystyna & Kochetkov, Oleksii & Honcharenko, Stanislav & Levkina, Ruslana & Bichevin, Maksym, 2021. "Controlling, monitoring and diagnostics in identifying effective management practices of agricultural enterprises," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 7(2), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:313636
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.313636
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/313636/files/11_Fedicheva_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.313636?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tingting Liu & Randall J. F. Bruins & Matthew T. Heberling, 2018. "Factors Influencing Farmers’ Adoption of Best Management Practices: A Review and Synthesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Komarek, Adam M. & De Pinto, Alessandro & Smith, Vincent H., 2020. "A review of types of risks in agriculture: What we know and what we need to know," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shebanina, Olena & Burkovska, Anna & Petrenko, Vadym & Burkovska, Alla, 2023. "Economic planning at agricultural enterprises: Ukrainian experience of increasing the availability of data in the context of food security," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(4), December.
    2. Skrynkovskyy, Ruslan & Pavlenchyk, Nataliia & Tsyuh, Svyatoslav & Zanevskyy, Ihor & Pavlenchyk, Anatoliі, 2022. "Economic-mathematical model of enterprise profit maximization in the system of sustainable development values," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(4), December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blazquez-Soriano, Amparo & Ramos-Sandoval, Rosmery, 2022. "Information transfer as a tool to improve the resilience of farmers against the effects of climate change: The case of the Peruvian National Agrarian Innovation System," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    2. Vigani, Mauro & Khafagy, Amr & Berry, Robert, 2024. "Public spending for agricultural risk management: Land use, regional welfare and intra-subsidy substitution," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    3. Chandra S. R. Nuthalapati & Chaitanya Nuthalapati, 2021. "Has Open Innovation Taken Root in India? Evidence from Startups Working in Food Value Chains," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(4), pages 1207-1230, December.
    4. Daniele, Bertolozzi-Caredio & Barbara, Soriano & Isabel, Bardaji & Alberto, Garrido, 2022. "Analysis of perceived robustness, adaptability and transformability of Spanish extensive livestock farms under alternative challenging scenarios," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    5. Ruzzante, Sacha & Labarta, Ricardo & Bilton, Amy, 2021. "Adoption of agricultural technology in the developing world: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    6. Beetstra, Margaret A. & Wilson, Robyn S. & Doidge, Mary, 2022. "Conservation behavior over time: Examining a Midwestern farmer sample," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    7. Lotte Yanore & Jaap Sok & Alfons Oude Lansink, 2024. "Do Dutch farmers invest in expansion despite increased policy uncertainty? A participatory Bayesian network approach," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(1), pages 93-115, January.
    8. Soriano, Bárbara & Garrido, Alberto & Bertolozzi-Caredio, Daniele & Accatino, Francesco & Antonioli, Federico & Krupin, Vitaliy & Meuwissen, Miranda P.M. & Ollendorf, Franziska & Rommel, Jens & Spiege, 2023. "Actors and their roles for improving resilience of farming systems in Europe," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 98, pages 134-146.
    9. Daniel C. Kenny & Juan Castilla-Rho, 2022. "What Prevents the Adoption of Regenerative Agriculture and What Can We Do about It? Lessons and Narratives from a Participatory Modelling Exercise in Australia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-30, August.
    10. Murrja Arif & Ndreca Pjetër & Maloku Sadik & Meço Maksim, 2023. "Analysis of Production Risk in Intensive Chicken Farms – The Case of Kosovo," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 23(2), pages 294-310, December.
    11. Oscar Montes de Oca Munguia & Rick Llewellyn, 2020. "The Adopters versus the Technology: Which Matters More when Predicting or Explaining Adoption?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(1), pages 80-91, March.
    12. Kristina Beethem & Sandra T. Marquart-Pyatt & Jennifer Lai & Tian Guo, 2023. "Navigating the information landscape: public and private information source access by midwest farmers," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 1117-1135, September.
    13. Wonga Masiza & Johannes George Chirima & Hamisai Hamandawana & Ahmed Mukalazi Kalumba & Hezekiel Bheki Magagula, 2022. "Do Satellite Data Correlate with In Situ Rainfall and Smallholder Crop Yields? Implications for Crop Insurance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-13, January.
    14. Chen, Jian & Katchova, Ani L. & Zhou, Chenxi, 2021. "Agricultural loan delinquency prediction using machine learning methods," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 24(5), May.
    15. Gema Parra & Luis Joaquin Garcia-Lopez & José A. Piqueras & Roberto García, 2022. "Identification of Farmers’ Barriers to Implement Sustainable Management Practices in Olive Groves," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, May.
    16. Massey, J.H. & Reba, M.L. & Adviento-Borbe, M.A. & Chiu, Y.L. & Payne, G.K., 2022. "Direct comparisons of four irrigation systems on a commercial rice farm: Irrigation water use efficiencies and water dynamics," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    17. Godwin Seyram Agbemavor Horlu & Ellen Genevieve Thompson, 2024. "Challenges and mitigating measures in local fruits retail in Southern Ghana," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(11), pages 1-21, November.
    18. Pongspikul, Tayatorn & McCann, Laura M., 2020. "Farmers’ Adoption of Pressure Irrigation Systems: The Case of Cotton Producers in the Southeastern versus Southwestern U.S," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304332, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Mohamed Ghali & Maha Ben Jaballah & Nejla Ben Arfa & Annie Sigwalt, 2022. "Analysis of factors that influence adoption of agroecological practices in viticulture," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 103(3), pages 179-209, September.
    20. Sergei Schaub & Nadja El Benni, 2024. "How do price (risk) changes influence farmers’ preferences to reduce fertilizer application?," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(2), pages 365-383, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Crop Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:313636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.