IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajfand/340612.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterising Family Farms And Their Constraints And Agroecological Intensification Options: A Case Study From The Sahelian Zone, Niger

Author

Listed:
  • Sani Issa, MS
  • Saidou, AA
  • Jangorzo, NS
  • Karembe, M

Abstract

Family farms play an important role in food security and nutrition in West Africa. Family farms are rapidly changing and face many constraints. Thus, characterizing them is necessary for policy purposes. This study aimed to characterise family farms in Niger, focusing on the current constraints to family farms and existing agroecological intensification (AEI) options. A survey was conducted using a questionnaire administered to 108 family farms across the selected six study locations. We used descriptive statistics to characterise the family farms and the factorial analysis of mixed data (FAMD) and the Hierarchical Clustering of Principal Components (HCPC) to identify the types of family farms. Results showed that family farms, on average, encompass three households, and the majority (87.2%) of the family farms surveyed were managed by married persons where 25.7% of whom are female. Agriculture remains the primary source of income for 98.2% of people in the study locations, and the main second source of family income (47.7%) is animal husbandry. Family farms are mainly characterised by the presence of the main field (MF) (98%) led by the heads of households and the presence of the women fields (WF) (78%) led by the women. Regarding farm size, the average MF and the WF farm sizes were 3.0 ha and 1.5 ha, respectively. The main identified constraints to family farms were soil fertility decline (84.33%), a recurrent early end of the rainy season (84.33%), farmers’ low income (41.15%), and limited access to the market (24.70%). Twelve potential AEIs options across the study area were explored. In the MF, the major AEI options practised by farmers were: the application of organic manure as fertilizer (73.27%), cereallegume intercropping (68.83%), and Farmer Managed Natural Regeneration (35.85%). Whereas in the WF, the AEI practices were the application of organic manure (55.28%), and cereal-legume intercropping (28.98%). Co-building an integrative approach that combines multiple AEI options in the same field is necessary to tackle the main drivers of the farming systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Sani Issa, MS & Saidou, AA & Jangorzo, NS & Karembe, M, 2024. "Characterising Family Farms And Their Constraints And Agroecological Intensification Options: A Case Study From The Sahelian Zone, Niger," African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), vol. 24(1), January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajfand:340612
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.340612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/340612/files/Issa.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.340612?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lowder, Sarah K. & Skoet, Jakob & Raney, Terri, 2016. "The Number, Size, and Distribution of Farms, Smallholder Farms, and Family Farms Worldwide," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 16-29.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jellason, Nugun P. & Robinson, Elizabeth J. Z. & Ogbaga, Chukwuma C., 2021. "Agriculture 4.0: is sub-Saharan Africa ready?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113550, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. David K. Levine & Andrea Mattozzi & Salvatore Modica, 2021. "Trade Associations: Why Not Cartels?," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 62(1), pages 47-64, February.
    3. Dieppe,Alistair Matthew & Matsuoka,Hideaki, 2021. "Sectoral Decomposition of Convergence in Labor Productivity : A Re-examination from a New Dataset," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9767, The World Bank.
    4. Campi, Mercedes & Dueñas, Marco & Fagiolo, Giorgio, 2021. "Specialization in food production affects global food security and food systems sustainability," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    5. Patil, Vikram & Ghosh, Ranjan & Kathuria, Vinish & Farrell, Katharine N., 2020. "Money, Land or self-employment? Understanding preference heterogeneity in landowners’ choices for compensation under land acquisition in India," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    6. Nolte, Kerstin & Ostermeier, Martin, 2017. "Labour Market Effects of Large-Scale Agricultural Investment: Conceptual Considerations and Estimated Employment Effects," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 430-446.
    7. Misganaw Teshager Abeje & Atsushi Tsunekawa & Nigussie Haregeweyn & Zerihun Nigussie & Enyew Adgo & Zemen Ayalew & Mitsuru Tsubo & Asres Elias & Daregot Berihun & Amy Quandt & Mulatu Liyew Berihun & T, 2019. "Communities’ Livelihood Vulnerability to Climate Variability in Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-22, November.
    8. Dang, Hai-Anh H & Carletto, Calogero, 2022. "Recall Bias Revisited: Measure Farm Labor Using Mixed-Mode Surveys and Multiple Imputation," IZA Discussion Papers 14997, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Luis Bauluz & Yajna Govind & Filip Novokmet, 2020. "Global Land Inequality," PSE Working Papers halshs-03022318, HAL.
    10. Wuepper, David & Wimmer, Stefan & Sauer, Johannes, 2020. "Is small family farming more environmentally sustainable? Evidence from a spatial regression discontinuity design in Germany," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    11. Bryceson, Deborah Fahy, 2019. "Gender and generational patterns of African deagrarianization: Evolving labour and land allocation in smallholder peasant household farming, 1980–2015," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 60-72.
    12. Ilia Alomía Herrera & Rose Paque & Michiel Maertens & Veerle Vanacker, 2022. "History of Land Cover Change on Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-24, July.
    13. Jiancheng Zhai & Xiao Sun & Xueqin Hu & Jun Tian & Zhiqiang Huang, 2024. "Evolutionary Trends and Hotspot Analysis of Livelihood Strategy for Agricultural Residents Based on Bibliometrics," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, July.
    14. Bevis, Leah EM. & Barrett, Christopher B., 2020. "Close to the edge: High productivity at plot peripheries and the inverse size-productivity relationship," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    15. Margarita Gáfaro & César Mantilla, 2019. "Preferences, Uncertainty, and Biases in Land Division: A Bargaining Experiment in the Field," Borradores de Economia 1092, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    16. Teye, Evans Sackey & Quarshie, Philip Tetteh, 2021. "Impact of agriculture finance in modern technologies adoption for enhanced productivity and rural household economic wellbeing in Ghana: A case study of rice farmers in Shai-Osudoku District," SocArXiv 9ue2k, Center for Open Science.
    17. Mengjin Ma & Huan Li & Dongliang Yan & Yihan Zhang & Miaomiao Song & Yongchao Wang & Hao Wang & Ruixin Shao & Jiameng Guo & Qinghua Yang, 2022. "Application of Blended Controlled-Release and Normal Urea with Suitable Maize Varieties to Achieve Integrated Agronomic and Environmental Impact in a High-Yielding Summer Maize System," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, August.
    18. Sophie de Bruin & Just Denerink & Pritpal Randhawa & Idrissa Wade & Hester Biemans & Christian Siderius, 2022. "IFAD Research Series 71: Urbanizing food systems: exploring opportunities for rural transformation," IFAD Research Series 320721, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
    19. Bequet, Ludovic, 2021. "Agricultural productivity and land inequality. Evidence from the Philippines," MPRA Paper 108131, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Meinhard Breiling, 2021. "Global rural value chains and the role of natural disasters in their transformation," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 23(3), pages 540-567, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Farm Management; Food Security and Poverty;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajfand:340612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ajfand.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.