IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajfand/334138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Proximate, microbiological analysis and digestibility of pepsin in atta sexdens flour, from the region of Rioja, Perú

Author

Listed:
  • Bendeza Ccanto, Jessica
  • Condori, Chura Julissa
  • Lozada-Urbano, Michelle

Abstract

The consumption of insects, also known as entomophagy, is not a new eating habit; on the contrary, the insects are eaten in many countries worldwide, where insects are served as the main dish in many of them. In Peru, insect consumption is limited to regions of the central jungle where locals consume ants of the "Atta sexdens" variety in the form of toasted snacks with salt. Analysis of insects has shown a wide variation in macronutrient content relative to most wild vertebrate meats, encompassing a wide range of protein, fat and carbohydrate concentrations. In that sense, in terms of their proportional macronutrient composition, insects could serve as equivalents not only to wild meat, but also to other foods, such as seafood, nuts, legumes, vegetables or fruits. The aim of this study was to assess nutritional quality of "Atta sexdens" ant flour and determine its physical and chemical characteristics. The ants were obtained from the department of San Martín, province and district of Rioja and underwent a rigorous cleaning process to eliminate impurities such as wings, leaves and soil which are attached to the ants. The ants were dried using a Biobase oven, model BOV-T30C, and then ground in an electric grinder and finally passed through a sieve. The final product was measured for physicochemical properties such as pH, % acidity in aqueous extract and % acidity in ethanolic extract, resulting in 6.57, 0.21, and 0.29, respectively. The nutritional composition assessment was based on the AOAC standard method where the fat content of the meal was 35.40%; protein, 35.51%; carbohydrate, 16.12%; ash, 5.39%; and moisture, 7.58%. For the assessment of pepsin digestibility, the AOAC 971.09 test method was used, resulting in 99.77% activity. In regard to techno-functional properties, it was found that swelling capacity (SC) and water absorption capacity (WAC) resulted in 2.91 WAC g water/g m and 1.86 SC ml/g, respectively. On the other hand, the microbiological results were within the permissible limits for health; therefore, we can consider this ant meal a safe and innocuous product as well as an excellent food source with exceptional nutritional characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Bendeza Ccanto, Jessica & Condori, Chura Julissa & Lozada-Urbano, Michelle, 2022. "Proximate, microbiological analysis and digestibility of pepsin in atta sexdens flour, from the region of Rioja, Perú," African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), vol. 22(10).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajfand:334138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/334138/files/Mitiku22420.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kefyalew Endale, 2011. "Fertilizer Consumption and Agricultural Productivity in Ethiopia," Working Papers 003, Policy Studies Institute.
    2. Yu, Bingxin & Nin-Pratt, Alejandro & Funes, José & Gemessa, Sinafikeh Asrat, 2011. "Cereal production and technology adoption in Ethiopia," ESSP working papers 31, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    3. Gucheng Li & Zhongchao Feng & Liangzhi You & Lixia Fan, 2013. "Re-examining the inverse relationship between farm size and efficiency," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(4), pages 473-488, November.
    4. Gebregziabher, G. & Namara, Regassa E., 2008. "Investment in irrigation as a poverty reduction strategy: analysis of small-scale irrigation impact on poverty in Tigray, Ethiopia," Conference Papers h044074, International Water Management Institute.
    5. Gebregziabher, G. & Namara, Regassa E., 2008. "Investment in irrigation as a poverty reduction strategy: analysis of small-scale irrigation impact on poverty in Tigray, Ethiopia," IWMI Conference Proceedings 246401, International Water Management Institute.
    6. repec:edi:wpaper:003 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Cheryl R. Doss & Michael L. Morris, 2000. "How does gender affect the adoption of agricultural innovations?," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 25(1), pages 27-39, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samuel Sebsibie & Workineh Asmare & Tessema Endalkachew, 2015. "Agricultural Technology Adoption and Rural Poverty: a Study on Smallholders in Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia," Ethiopian Journal of Economics, Ethiopian Economics Association, vol. 23(2), December.
    2. Bachewe, Fantu Nisrane & Berhane, Guush & Minten, Bart & Taffesse, Alemayehu Seyoum, 2015. "Agricultural growth in Ethiopia (2004-2014): Evidence and drivers," ESSP working papers 81, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    3. Koyachew Enkuahone Kassie & Bamlaku Alamirew Alemu, 2021. "Does irrigation improve household’s food security? The case of Koga irrigation development project in northern Ethiopia," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(2), pages 291-307, April.
    4. Mekonnen, Tigist, 2017. "Productivity and household welfare impact of technology adoption: Micro-level evidence from rural Ethiopia," MERIT Working Papers 2017-007, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    5. Azzarri, Carlo & Nico, Gianluigi, 2022. "Sex-disaggregated agricultural extension and weather variability in Africa south of the Sahara," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    6. Cathy Rozel Farnworth & Els Lecoutere & Alessandra Galiè & Bjorn Van Campenhout & Marlène Elias & Markus Ihalainen & Lara Roeven & Preeti Bharati & Ana Maria Paez Valencia & Mary Crossland & Barbara, 2023. "Methodologies for Researching Feminization of Agriculture: What Do They Tell Us?," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 23(3), pages 294-316, July.
    7. Silva Larson & Anne (Giger)-Dray & Tina Cornioley & Manithaythip Thephavanh & Phomma Thammavong & Sisavan Vorlasan & John G. Connell & Magnus Moglia & Peter Case & Kim S. Alexander & Pascal Perez, 2020. "A Game-Based Approach to Exploring Gender Differences in Smallholder Decisions to Change Farming Practices: White Rice Production in Laos," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Mekonnen, Daniel Ayalew & Gerber, Nicolas & Matz, Julia Anna, 2018. "Gendered Social Networks, Agricultural Innovations, and Farm Productivity in Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 321-335.
    9. Tabe-Ojong, M.P.J. & Mausch, K. & Woldeyohanes, T. & Heckelei, T., 2018. "A Triple-Hurdle Model of the Impacts of Improved Chickpea Adoption on Smallholder Production and Commercialization in Ethiopia," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277287, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Morley, Samuel & Piñeiro, Valeria & Robinson, Sherman, 2011. "External shocks and policy alternatives in small open economies: The case of El Salvador," IFPRI discussion papers 1134, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    11. Abate, Gashaw T. & de Brauw, Alan & Minot, Nicholas & Bernard, Tanguy, 2015. "The impact of the use of new technologies on farmers’ wheat yield in Ethiopia: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial," IFPRI discussion papers 1462, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    12. Katrina Kosec & Kamiljon Akramov & Bakhrom Mirkasimov & Jie Song & Hongdi Zhao, 2022. "Aspirations and women's empowerment: Evidence from Kyrgyzstan," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 101-134, January.
    13. Christina Handschuch & Meike Wollni, 2016. "Improved production systems for traditional food crops: the case of finger millet in western Kenya," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(4), pages 783-797, August.
    14. Yasmin, Nazia & Grundmann, Philipp, 2020. "Home-cooked energy transitions: Women empowerment and biogas-based cooking technology in Pakistan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    15. Chaozhu Li & Xiaoliang Li & Wei Jia, 2022. "Non-Farm Employment Experience, Risk Preferences, and Low-Carbon Agricultural Technology Adoption: Evidence from 1843 Grain Farmers in 14 Provinces in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Khan, Mohammed Tajuddin & Kishore, Avinash & Joshi, Pramod K., 2016. "Gender dimensions on farmers’ preferences for direct-seeded rice with drum seeder in India," IFPRI discussion papers 1550, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    17. Cheryl Doss, 2012. "Intrahousehold Bargaining and Resource Allocation in Developing Countries," World Bank Publications - Reports 9145, The World Bank Group.
    18. Doss, Cheryl, 2013. "Intrahousehold bargaining and resource allocation in developing countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6337, The World Bank.
    19. Chamberlin, Jordan & Schmidt, Emily, 2012. "Ethiopian Agriculture: A dynamic geographic perspective," IFPRI book chapters, in: Food and agriculture in Ethiopia: Progress and policy challenges, chapter 2, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    20. Ghadir Asadi & Mohammad H. Mostafavi-Dehzooei, 2022. "The Role of Learning in Adaptation to Technology: The Case of Groundwater Extraction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-37, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajfand:334138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ajfand.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.