IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajfand/334030.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Situational analysis of abiotic and biotic factors influencing abundance of tissue culture and non-tissue culture bananas in smallholder farms in western Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Murongo, Marius Flarian
  • Ayuke, O. Frederick
  • Mwine, T. Julius

Abstract

Bananas are, in Uganda primarily, grown for domestic consumption and regional trade. Production is constrained by several factors such as declining soil fertility, pests and disease, and erratic rainfall. Tissue culture banana were introduced partly to solve some of the challenges in banana production, though uptake of such technologies by smallholder farmers is still low. A survey on plant parasitic nematodes, banana weevils, and selected soil factors was done to analyse their effect on the abundance of tissue culture banana (TCB) and non-tissue culture banana (NTCB). Soil and banana root samples were collected from heterogeneous on-farm orchard conditions in smallholder farms. Composite banana root samples and composite soil samples were collected from banana orchards already established by farmers. A total of 1,280 genets from 20 orchards were obtained. Composite soil samples were analysed for pH, potassium, phosphorus, nitrogen, and organic matter. Endo-parasitic Helicotylenchus multinctus, Platylenchus goodeyi, Radopholous similis and Meloidogyne spp were isolated from the composite root samples. Banana weevils were captured using the disc-on-stamp and split-pseudo stem traps. Redundancy Analysis (RDA) and logistic regression were run to ascertain the relationship between variations in biotic [Nematodes and weevils] and abiotic [pH, K, Av.P, N, and OM] factors affecting the abundance of the banana type. Canonical eigenvalues showed that both biotic and abiotic variables significantly affected the abundance of TCB and NTCB banana types. Abundance of TCB was influenced by the banana weevil (P<0.05) than it was by nematodes in the same farmers’ fields. Infestation with nematodes for TCB and NTCB banana types was not different (P<0.05). The banana weevils were significantly (P<0.05) distributed within the districts. Relative abundances for the pH, phosphorus, potassium, nitrogen (%), organic matter (%) within districts were significant (P<0.05). Variations in soil pH and nitrogen availability resulted in significant interactions (P<0.05) that affected the abundance of the TCB types more than their contribution to the abundance of NTCB. The awareness that the interactions between nematodes, banana weevils, phosphorus, nitrogen, potassium and pH determine the abundance of banana types is important in shaping the adoption and production of the adopted banana technology. Mitigation of acidic pH, K, Av.P, N, and OM for soil fertility and reduction of the abundance of nematodes and weevils below the threshold will enhance banana production among small holder farmers in Uganda.

Suggested Citation

  • Murongo, Marius Flarian & Ayuke, O. Frederick & Mwine, T. Julius, 2022. "Situational analysis of abiotic and biotic factors influencing abundance of tissue culture and non-tissue culture bananas in smallholder farms in western Uganda," African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), vol. 22(03).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajfand:334030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/334030/files/Murongo19745.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coyne, D.L. & Nicol, J.M. & Claudius-Cole, B., 2007. "Practical plant nematology: A field and laboratory guide," Manuals 56182, CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.
    2. van Asten, P.J.A. & Wairegi, L.W.I. & Mukasa, D. & Uringi, N.O., 2011. "Agronomic and economic benefits of coffee-banana intercropping in Uganda's smallholder farming systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(4), pages 326-334, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Phan Thi Thuy & Le Duc Niem & Thi Minh Hop Ho & Philippe Burny & Philippe Lebailly, 2018. "Economic Analysis of Perennial Crop Systems in Dak Lak Province, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Saragih, Jef Rudiantho, 2013. "Socioeconomic and Ecological Dimension of Certified and Conventional Arabica Coffee Production in North Sumatra, Indonesia," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 3(03), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Notaro, Martin & Gary, Christian & Le Coq, Jean-François & Metay, Aurélie & Rapidel, Bruno, 2022. "How to increase the joint provision of ecosystem services by agricultural systems. Evidence from coffee-based agroforestry systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    4. Jules Ngango & Seung Gyu Kim, 2019. "Assessment of Technical Efficiency and Its Potential Determinants among Small-Scale Coffee Farmers in Rwanda," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-12, July.
    5. Chen, Ning & Li, Xianyue & Šimůnek, Jiří & Shi, Haibin & Zhang, Yuehong & Hu, Qi, 2022. "Quantifying inter-species nitrogen competition in the tomato-corn intercropping system with different spatial arrangements," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    6. Liu, Xiaogang & Qi, Yuntao & Li, Fusheng & Yang, Qiliang & Yu, Liming, 2018. "Impacts of regulated deficit irrigation on yield, quality and water use efficiency of Arabica coffee under different shading levels in dry and hot regions of southwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 292-300.
    7. Enock Warinda & Dickson M Nyariki & Stephen Wambua & Reuben M Muasya & Munir A Hanjra, 2020. "Sustainable development in East Africa: impact evaluation of regional agricultural development projects in Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(1), pages 3-39, February.
    8. Bernardo Martin-Gorriz & José A. Zabala & Virginia Sánchez-Navarro & Belén Gallego-Elvira & Víctor Martínez-García & Francisco Alcon & José Francisco Maestre-Valero, 2022. "Intercropping Practices in Mediterranean Mandarin Orchards from an Environmental and Economic Perspective," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Latynskiy, Evgeny & Berger, Thomas, 2016. "Networks of Rural Producer Organizations in Uganda: What Can be Done to Make Them Work Better?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 572-586.
    10. Yen Pham & Kathryn Reardon-Smith & Shahbaz Mushtaq & Geoff Cockfield, 2019. "The impact of climate change and variability on coffee production: a systematic review," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 156(4), pages 609-630, October.
    11. Ssebunya, Brian Robert & Schader, Christian & Baumgart, Lukas & Landert, Jan & Altenbuchner, Christine & Schmid, Erwin & Stolze, Matthias, 2019. "Sustainability Performance of Certified and Non-certified Smallholder Coffee Farms in Uganda," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 35-47.
    12. Lenka Ehrenbergerová & Marie Klimková & Yessika Garcia Cano & Hana Habrová & Samuel Lvončík & Daniel Volařík & Warbota Khum & Petr Němec & Soben Kim & Petr Jelínek & Petr Maděra, 2021. "Does Shade Impact Coffee Yield, Tree Trunk, and Soil Moisture on Coffea canephora Plantations in Mondulkiri, Cambodia?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Jezeer, Rosalien E. & Verweij, Pita A. & Santos, Maria J. & Boot, René G.A., 2017. "Shaded Coffee and Cocoa – Double Dividend for Biodiversity and Small-scale Farmers," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 136-145.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajfand:334030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ajfand.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.