IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aieabj/149218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transformation for sustainable agriculture: what role for the second Pillar of CAP?

Author

Listed:
  • Dwyer, Janet

Abstract

EU agriculture and rural areas face significant medium-term challenges arising from existing and ‘new’ sources; as acknowledged in the EU2020 vision. The European Commission has placed emphasis upon innovation as a key element in achieving transformation, in the coming decade. Findings from a recent study for the European Parliament highlight the potential role of Pillar 2 rural development programmes as vehicles for enabling innovation. Key roles include supporting knowledge exchange; collaboration; and research-into-practice linkages. Effective knowledge exchange (KE) is a critical element, but innovation in KE itself is often needed. Collaboration can be valuable in fostering cross-sectoral linkages, and communities of learning show innovation potential. Integration of measures in tailored packages appears to increase the scope for innovation. Equally important, there is a vital need for innovation in policy design and delivery, to enable a cost-effective transformation of agriculture and rural areas. The CAP proposals 2014-2020 make a positive contribution to better promote innovation through Pillar 2, but there is room for improvement. Models for policy innovation adapted from experience in commercial organisations are suggested as worthy of further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Dwyer, Janet, 2013. "Transformation for sustainable agriculture: what role for the second Pillar of CAP?," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 2(1), pages 1-19, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aieabj:149218
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.149218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/149218/files/12174-23938-1-PB.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.149218?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Catherine Laidin & Marielle Berriet-Solliec, 2023. "Understanding rural development policies: a proposal for a typology of the seven main policy repertoires in Europe and locally, based on French case studies," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 71(1), pages 121-144, August.
    2. Campus, Daniela, 2014. "Evaluating agri-environmental schemes. The case of Tuscany," 2014 Third Congress, June 25-27, 2014, Alghero, Italy 172969, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    3. Pisani, Elena & Burighel, Laura, 2014. "Structures and dynamics of transnational cooperation networks: evidence based on Local Action Groups in the Veneto Region," 2014 Third Congress, June 25-27, 2014, Alghero, Italy 173117, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    4. Włodzimierz Kołodziejczak, 2020. "Employment and Gross Value Added in Agriculture Versus Other Sectors of the European Union Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-24, July.
    5. Inga C. Melchior & Jens Newig, 2021. "Governing Transitions towards Sustainable Agriculture—Taking Stock of an Emerging Field of Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-27, January.
    6. Legrand D. F. Saint‐Cyr, 2022. "Heterogeneous farm‐size dynamics and impacts of subsidies from agricultural policy: Evidence from France," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(3), pages 893-923, September.
    7. Campus, Daniela, 2014. "Evaluating agri-environmental schemes: the case of Tuscany," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182919, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Apostolos G. Papadopoulos, 2015. "The Impact of the CAP on Agriculture and Rural Areas of EU Member States," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 4(1), pages 22-53, April.
    9. Mantino, Francesco, 2013. "What is going to change in EU rural development policies after 2013? Main implications in different national contexts," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 2(2), pages 1-17, August.
    10. Matthews, Alan, 2013. "Greening agricultural payments in the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 2(1), pages 1-27, April.
    11. Doyeon Lee & Keunhwan Kim, 2022. "National Investment Framework for Revitalizing the R&D Collaborative Ecosystem of Sustainable Smart Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-30, May.
    12. Legrand D. F, Saint-Cyr, 2017. "Farm heterogeneity and agricultural policy impacts on size dynamics: evidence from France," Working Papers SMART 17-04, INRAE UMR SMART.
    13. Saint-Cyr, Legrand D. F., 2016. "Farm segmentation and agricultural policy impacts on structural change: evidence from France," 149th Seminar, October 27-28, 2016, Rennes, France 244789, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Pisani, Elena & Burighel, Laura, 2014. "Structures and dynamics of transnational cooperation networks: evidence based on Local Action Groups in the Veneto Region, Italy," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 3(3), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Pindado, Emilio & Sánchez, Mercedes & Verstegen, Jos A.A.M. & Lans, Thomas, 2018. "Searching for the entrepreneurs among new entrants in European Agriculture: the role of human and social capital," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 19-30.
    16. Ewa Kiryluk-Dryjska & Barbara Więckowska & Kinga Smolińska, 2022. "Winners and Losers of the CAP’s Rural Development Policy in Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, May.
    17. repec:ags:aoeisl:143971 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Francesco Diotallevi & Emanuele Blasi & Silvio Franco, 2015. "Greening as compensation to production of environmental public goods: how do common rules have an influence at local level? The case of durum wheat in Italy," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 3(1), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Thomas Slijper & Yann de Mey & P Marijn Poortvliet & Miranda P M Meuwissen, 2022. "Quantifying the resilience of European farms using FADN," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 49(1), pages 121-150.
    20. Saint-Cyr, Legrand D. F., 2016. "Accounting for farm heterogeneity in the assessment of agricultural policy impacts on structural change," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235778, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    21. Vanni, Francesco & Cardillo, Concetta, 2013. "The effects of CAP greening on Italian agriculture," Politica Agricola Internazionale - International Agricultural Policy, Edizioni L'Informatore Agrario, vol. 2013(3), September.
    22. Elisabetta Croci & Silvia Sorana, 2013. "Le variazioni nei redditi agricoli ai tempi della Grande recessione," AGRICOLTURA ISTITUZIONI MERCATI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(3), pages 13-32.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aieabj:149218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aieaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.