IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/agreko/348129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the motivations driving meat analogue purchase among middle-income consumers in Mbombela, South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Tsvakirai, C. Z.
  • Zulu, N. M.

Abstract

Meat analogues are becoming widely accepted in high-income countries as substitutes for meat. As consumer acceptance of faux meat is beginning to follow a similar trend in South Africa, this study investigated the aspects of the product’s positioning that could be used to further grow the product’s market. Using data collected from 130 middle-income consumers in Mbombela, the study determined consumer perceptions of meat analogues. These were measured using composite indices extracted using principal component analysis, and these indices were regressed against the consumers’ purchase probability of meat alternatives. The study’s results showed that meat alternatives were perceived as a pricey symbol of class and status. This was found to have a two-sided effect on consumer behaviour. On one hand, the products' position encouraged purchase among the survey respondents and encouraged them to recommend the products to their peers and on the other, it discouraged consumption with their families. As this finding shows that meat analogues remain niche products in the study area, the study offers recommendations on ways to improve product performance in the niche market. It also suggests changes in the products’ marketing that could assist in launching them into the mainstream food market of South Africa.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsvakirai, C. Z. & Zulu, N. M., 2022. "Investigating the motivations driving meat analogue purchase among middle-income consumers in Mbombela, South Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 61(2), April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:348129
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.348129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/348129/files/Investigating%20the%20motivations%20driving%20meat%20analogue%20purchase%20among%20middle-income%20consumers%20in%20Mbombela%20%20South%20Africa.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.348129?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Conradie, Beatrice & Piesse, Jenifer, 2016. "Ranking perceived risk to farmers: How important is the environment?," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Majola Mabuza & Gerald Ortmann & Edilegnaw Wale, 2015. "Collective action in small-scale mushroom production in Swaziland: does organisational form matter?," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(7), pages 1025-1042, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Conradie, Beatrice, 2019. "Land Use and Redistribution in the Arid West: The case of Laingsburg Magisterial District," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 58(3), June.
    2. Wustro, Ivo & Conradie, Beatrice, 2019. "How stable are farmers’ risk perceptions? A follow-up study of one community in the Karoo," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 59(1), September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:348129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeasaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.