IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/agreko/347871.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Use and Redistribution in the Arid West: The case of Laingsburg Magisterial District

Author

Listed:
  • Conradie, Beatrice

Abstract

Data collected during a multi-year study of farming in the district is updated to compile a land register. It identifies 30% of farmland by farm size and type and provides estimates of financial performance in each class. Three redistribution scenarios are considered – proportional redistribution, targeting large bona fide operations and targeting lifestyle land. The basic premise is still willing buyer willing seller. Changing the acquisition rules hardly affects the number of beneficiaries or the cost of redistribution but demonstrates that it is important not to overpay for lifestyle land. A redistribution plan for smallholder and settlement-orientated land users is added to the commercial plan according to Aliber's ratios. Commercial redistribution will involve 33 farms with a combined area of 2113 km2 at a total cost of between R352–384 million (using 2015 prices) and will include scope to provide for 132 commonage farmers and 660 settlement-orientated land users. Two-thirds of the land involved was for sale in January 2019 or could be enticed onto the market relatively easily because it has a low opportunity cost in agriculture and the plan would reach as many beneficiaries as there were indigent households in the district in 2017.

Suggested Citation

  • Conradie, Beatrice, 2019. "Land Use and Redistribution in the Arid West: The case of Laingsburg Magisterial District," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 58(3), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:347871
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.347871
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/347871/files/Land%20Use%20and%20Redistribution%20in%20the%20Arid%20West%20%20The%20case%20of%20Laingsburg%20Magisterial%20District.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.347871?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Conradie, Beatrice & Piesse, Jenifer, 2016. "Ranking perceived risk to farmers: How important is the environment?," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, December.
    2. M. Lyne, 2014. "The F.R. Tomlinson memorial lecture: Two decades of land reform in South Africa: Insights from an agricultural economics," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(4), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Nattrass, Nicoli & Conradie, Beatrice & Conradie, Inge, 2015. "The Koup fencing project: Community-led job creation in the Karoo," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wustro, Ivo & Conradie, Beatrice, 2019. "How stable are farmers’ risk perceptions? A follow-up study of one community in the Karoo," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 59(1), September.
    2. Tsvakirai, C. Z. & Zulu, N. M., 2022. "Investigating the motivations driving meat analogue purchase among middle-income consumers in Mbombela, South Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 61(2), April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Land Economics/Use;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:347871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeasaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.