IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/agreko/267351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review And Comment: Agricultural Summit Meeting, 24th August, 1990 In Pretoria

Author

Listed:
  • Groenewald, J. A.

Abstract

A summit meeting between the SAAU and the government revealed important differences between these two with respect to economic, social and agricultural policy. The SAAU appears to favour retention of existing marketing and policy structures in agriculture and does not regard present international developments to warrant much change in domestic agricultural policy. It favours preferential treatment of farmers with respect to interest rates and subsidies, exemption of agriculture from labour laws and cooperatives from monopoly legislation. The government aims at deregulation, a bigger share for private initiative, economic growth, and less inflation. It favours reduction of preferential treatment of all favoured groups, including commercial agriculture. It wants to move to freer, more open markets and to removal of discriminatory laws. Both groups favour private property rights; the government wants to expand these. In the light of its wider range of interest and responsibilities and also external developments,the government approach appears to the more realistic than that of the SAAU. Future negotiations should involve more parties

Suggested Citation

  • Groenewald, J. A., 1991. "Review And Comment: Agricultural Summit Meeting, 24th August, 1990 In Pretoria," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 30(1), March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:267351
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.267351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/267351/files/agrekon-30-01-008.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/267351/files/agrekon-30-01-008.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.267351?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kay, John A., 1987. "public ownership, public regulation or public subsidy?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-2), pages 343-345.
    2. Kassier, W E & Groenewald, J A, 1990. "The Agricultural Economy of South Africa," 1990 Symposium, Agricultural Restructuring in Southern Africa, July 24-27, 1990, Swakopmund, Namibia 183486, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Kay, J A & Thompson, D J, 1986. "Privatisation: A Policy in Search of a Rationale," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 96(381), pages 18-32, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kassier, W E & Groenewald, J A, 1990. "The Agricultural Economy of South Africa," 1990 Symposium, Agricultural Restructuring in Southern Africa, July 24-27, 1990, Swakopmund, Namibia 183486, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Groenewald, J. A., 1991. "Viewpoint And Opinion: Scope For And Limitations To Deregulation And Privatisation Of South African Agricultural Services," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 30(2), June.
    3. Robert J. Michaels, 1989. "Reorganizing Electricity Supply In New Zealand: Lessons For The United States," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 7(4), pages 73-90, October.
    4. Simon Fink, 2013. "Policy Convergence with or without the European Union: The Interaction of Policy Success, EU Membership and Policy Convergence," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(4), pages 631-648, July.
    5. Espínola-Arredondo, Ana & Muñoz-García, Félix, 2013. "When does environmental regulation facilitate entry-deterring practices," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 133-152.
    6. Bel Germà & Fageda Xavier & E. Mildred, 2014. "Is private production of public services cheaper than public production? A meta-regression analysis of solid waste and water services," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 3, pages 103-140.
    7. Héctor G. González Padilla, 2009. "La privatización de bancos públicos provinciales en Argentina en 1993-2001," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 401, Universidad del CEMA.
    8. Muhamad, Goran M. & Heshmati, Almas & Khayyat, Nabaz T., 2021. "How to reduce the degree of dependency on natural resources?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    9. Carmen A. Li & John Stittle, 2014. "Privatisation and Franchising of British Train Operations," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 24(1), pages 53-65, March.
    10. Boyd D. Blackwell & John Asafu-Adjaye, 2020. "Adding Jewels To The Crown: The Marginal Recreational Value Of Noosa National Park And Implications For User Fees," Discussion Papers Series 622, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    11. Galyna Grygorenko & Stefan Lutz, 2007. "Firm performance and privatization in Ukraine," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 253-266, September.
    12. Walsh, Patrick Paul & Whelan, Ciara, 2001. "Firm performance and the political economy of corporate governance: survey evidence for Bulgaria, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 85-112, June.
    13. Nicolas Curien & Michel Gensollen, 1987. "De la théorie des structures industrielles à l'économie des réseaux de télécommunication," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 38(2), pages 521-578.
    14. Groenewald, Jan A., 1991. "Agricultural Trade And Marketing Policy: Future Directions," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 30(4), December.
    15. Groenewald, J. A., 1990. "Effectiveness And Efficiency Of Experts: An Evaluation Of Agricultural Economists," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 29(4), December.
    16. J. DavidBrown & JohnS. Earle & Álmos Telegdy, 2010. "Employment and Wage Effects of Privatisation: Evidence from Hungary, Romania, Russia and Ukraine," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 120(545), pages 683-708, June.
    17. Carine Catelin & Céline Chatelin, 2001. "Privatisation, gouvernement d'entreprise et processus décisionnel:une intégration de la dynamique organisationnelle à travers le cas de France Télécom," Working Papers CREGO 1010501, Université de Bourgogne - CREGO EA7317 Centre de recherches en gestion des organisations.
    18. Germà Bel, 2011. "The first privatisation: selling SOEs and privatising public monopolies in Fascist Italy (1922--1925)," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 35(5), pages 937-956.
    19. Joaquim Vergés, 2001. "Why governments sell public firms: The Spanish case," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 7(1), pages 114-132, February.
    20. Willner, Johan & Parker, David, 2002. "The Relative Performance of Public and Private Enterprise Under Conditions of Active and Passive Ownership," Centre on Regulation and Competition (CRC) Working papers 30591, University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:267351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeasaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.