IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/afgend/293587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Qualitative, comparative, and collaborative research at large scale: The GENNOVATE field methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Petesch, Patti
  • Badstue, Lone
  • Camfield, Laura
  • Feldman, Shelley
  • Prain, Gordon
  • Kantor, Paula

Abstract

We present a field-tested “medium-n” qualitative comparative methodology, which enhances understanding of the strong and fluid influence of gender norms on processes of local agricultural innovation in the Global South. The GENNOVATE approach (“Enabling Gender Equality in Agricultural and Environmental Innovation”) weaves together three broad methodological challenges—context, comparison, and collaboration—and highlights how addressing the social context of innovation contributes to applied research. We discuss GENNOVATE’s analytic approach, sampling framework, data collection, and analysis procedures, and reflect critically on the research strategies adopted to document and learn from the perspectives and experiences of over 7,000 women and men in 137 villages across 26 low- and middle-income countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Petesch, Patti & Badstue, Lone & Camfield, Laura & Feldman, Shelley & Prain, Gordon & Kantor, Paula, 2018. "Qualitative, comparative, and collaborative research at large scale: The GENNOVATE field methodology," Journal of Gender, Agriculture and Food Security (Agri-Gender), Africa Centre for Gender, Social Research and Impact Assessment, vol. 3(1), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:afgend:293587
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.293587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/293587/files/JGAFS-312018-2-Paper.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.293587?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lone Badstue & Patti Petesch & Cathy Rozel Farnworth & Lara Roeven & Mahlet Hailemariam, 2020. "Women Farmers and Agricultural Innovation: Marital Status and Normative Expectations in Rural Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Margaret A. McEwan & Moses S. Matui & Sarah Mayanja & Sam Namanda & Kwame Ogero, 2023. "Gender dynamics in seed systems: female makeover or male takeover of specialized sweetpotato seed production, in Lake Zone Tanzania?," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(3), pages 693-710, June.
    3. Diana E Lopez & Romain Frelat & Lone B Badstue, 2022. "Towards gender-inclusive innovation: Assessing local conditions for agricultural targeting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-25, March.
    4. Cathy Rozel Farnworth & Aye Moe San & Nanda Dulal Kundu & Md Monjurul Islam & Rownok Jahan & Lutz Depenbusch & Ramakrishnan Madhavan Nair & Theingi Myint & Pepijn Schreinemachers, 2020. "How Will Mechanizing Mung Bean Harvesting Affect Women Hired Laborers in Myanmar and Bangladesh?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Cathy Rozel Farnworth & Tahseen Jafry & Preeti Bharati & Lone Badstue & Ashok Yadav, 2021. "From Working in the Fields to Taking Control. Towards a Typology of Women's Decision-Making in Wheat in India," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(3), pages 526-552, June.
    6. Cathy Rozel Farnworth & Tahseen Jafry & Preeti Bharati & Lone Badstue & Ashok Yadav, 0. "From Working in the Fields to Taking Control. Towards a Typology of Women's Decision-Making in Wheat in India," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 0, pages 1-27.
    7. Alessandra Galiè & Dina Najjar & Patti Petesch & Lone Badstue & Cathy Rozel Farnworth, 2022. "Livestock Innovations, Social Norms, and Women’s Empowerment in the Global South," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Cathy Rozel Farnworth & Tahseen Jafry & Kanchan Lama & Sushila Chatterjee Nepali & Lone B. Badstue, 2019. "From Working in the Wheat Field to Managing Wheat: Women Innovators in Nepal," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(2), pages 293-313, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:afgend:293587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://agrigender.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.