IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/afbmau/121464.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lamb survival – balancing genetics, selection and management

Author

Listed:
  • Hatcher, Sue
  • Hinch, Geoff N.
  • Kilgour, Robert J.
  • Holst, Peter J.
  • Refshauge, P. Gordon
  • Shands, Chris G.

Abstract

The historically small size of the Australian sheep flock, along with the relatively high sheep and lamb prices compared to wool returns, has highlighted the issue of low reproductive efficiency of the Australian sheep flock, particularly the Merino. The major obstacle to improving net reproduction rate (NRR, the number of lambs weaned per ewe joined) is lamb survival. The animal welfare issues relating to lamb survival are discussed along with the major causes of lamb loss and factors that impact on lamb survival. The successful rearing of a lamb to weaning is the culmination of a sequence of often interrelated events involving genetics, physiology, behaviour and nutrition, with the environment providing an overarching complication. These interacting factors affect the outcome of an individual pregnancy, while the success or failure of each individual pregnancy determines the overall reproductive success of the whole flock. Three options are available for commercial sheep producers to improve reproductive efficiency. Firstly, Australian Sheep Breeding Values (ASBVs) can be used to select rams whose daughters will wean a higher percentage of lambs leading to improvements in lamb survival in future generations. Secondly, a combination of identifying and retaining the best performing ewes on the basis of NRR and removing the worst performers from the flock will improve lamb survival in the current generation. Thirdly, management options that involve monitoring and actively managing ewe nutrition during pregnancy and optimise the features of a lambing paddock will help boost lamb survival. Actively managing the body condition of the ewes during pregnancy to a target fat (or condition score) of 3 can significantly improve lamb survival, particularly that of twins. Minimising the impact of chill within the lambing paddock through reducing wind speed, increasing temperature and reducing dampness will enhance lamb survival. The benefits of each of these three options are cumulative, such that improvements in NRR of 14% within 10 years are possible. However, prior to the development of extension programs endorsing these three strategies to improve lamb survival, they must be demonstrated in commercial flocks across a range of production environments and proven to work over a number of seasons.

Suggested Citation

  • Hatcher, Sue & Hinch, Geoff N. & Kilgour, Robert J. & Holst, Peter J. & Refshauge, P. Gordon & Shands, Chris G., 2011. "Lamb survival – balancing genetics, selection and management," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 7(2), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:afbmau:121464
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.121464
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/121464/files/Hatcher%20et%20al%2009.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.121464?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moore, A. D. & Donnelly, J. R. & Freer, M., 1997. "GRAZPLAN: Decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises. III. Pasture growth and soil moisture submodels, and the GrassGro DSS," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 535-582, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asseng, Senthold & Thomas, Dean & McIntosh, Peter & Alves, Oscar & Khimashia, Nirav, 2012. "Managing mixed wheat–sheep farms with a seasonal forecast," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 50-56.
    2. Thamo, Tas & Addai, Donkor & Kragt, Marit E. & Kingwell, Ross S. & Pannell, David J. & Robertson, Michael J., 2019. "Climate change reduces the mitigation obtainable from sequestration in an Australian farming system," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(4), October.
    3. Donnelly, J. R. & Freer, M. & Moore, A. D., 1998. "Using the GrassGro decision support tool to evaluate some objective criteria for the definition of exceptional drought," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 301-313, July.
    4. Browne, Natalie & Kingwell, Ross S. & Behrendt, Ralph & Eckard, Richard, 2012. "Comparing the profitability of sheep, beef, dairy and grain farms in southwest Victoria under different rainfall scenarios," 2012 Conference (56th), February 7-10, 2012, Fremantle, Australia 124249, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    5. Harrison, Matthew T. & Jackson, Tom & Cullen, Brendan R. & Rawnsley, Richard P. & Ho, Christie & Cummins, Leo & Eckard, Richard J., 2014. "Increasing ewe genetic fecundity improves whole-farm production and reduces greenhouse gas emissions intensities," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 23-33.
    6. Brown, Peter D. & Cochrane, Thomas A. & Krom, Thomas D., 2010. "Optimal on-farm irrigation scheduling with a seasonal water limit using simulated annealing," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(6), pages 892-900, June.
    7. Browne, Natalie & Kingwell, Ross & Behrendt, Ralph & Eckard, Richard, 2013. "The relative profitability of dairy, sheep, beef and grain farm enterprises in southeast Australia under selected rainfall and price scenarios," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 35-44.
    8. Lo, Yueh-Hsin & Blanco, Juan A. & Canals, Rosa M. & González de Andrés, Ester & San Emeterio, Leticia & Imbert, J. Bosco & Castillo, Federico J., 2015. "Land use change effects on carbon and nitrogen stocks in the Pyrenees during the last 150 years: A modeling approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 322-334.
    9. White, Robin R. & Brady, Michael & Capper, Judith L. & Johnson, Kristen A., 2014. "Optimizing diet and pasture management to improve sustainability of U.S. beef production," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 1-12.
    10. Tinsley, Ty L. & Chumbley, Steven & Mathis, Clay & Machen, Richard & Turner, Benjamin L., 2019. "Managing cow herd dynamics in environments of limited forage productivity and livestock marketing channels: An application to semi-arid Pacific island beef production using system dynamics," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 78-93.
    11. Oomen, Roelof J. & Ewert, Frank & Snyman, Hennie A., 2016. "Modelling rangeland productivity in response to degradation in a semi-arid climate," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 322(C), pages 54-70.
    12. Sosheel S. Godfrey & Thomas Nordblom & Ryan H. L. Ip & Susan Robertson & Timothy Hutchings & Karl Behrendt, 2021. "Drought Shocks and Gearing Impacts on the Profitability of Sheep Farming," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Lewis, C.D. & Jacobs, J.L. & Smith, K.F. & Behrendt, R. & Malcolm, Bill, 2013. "Potential returns and risk of growing aluminium-tolerant lucerne in a grazing system with acidic soils located in the high rainfall zone," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 10, pages 1-15.
    14. Behrendt, Karl & Cacho, Oscar J. & Scott, James M. & Jones, Randall E., 2009. "Bioeconomic analysis of fertiliser input costs on pasture resource management under climatic uncertainty," 2009 Conference (53rd), February 11-13, 2009, Cairns, Australia 47628, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    15. Perillat, B. J. & Brown, W. J. & Cohen, R. D. H., 2004. "A risk efficiency analysis of backgrounding and finishing steers on pasture in Saskatchewan, Canada," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 213-233, June.
    16. Moore, A.D. & Holzworth, D.P. & Herrmann, N.I. & Huth, N.I. & Robertson, M.J., 2007. "The Common Modelling Protocol: A hierarchical framework for simulation of agricultural and environmental systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 95(1-3), pages 37-48, December.
    17. Jones, Randall E. & Kemp, David R. & Michalk, David & Takahashi, Taro, 2008. "The on-farm impact of alternative grazing management options to improve sustainability in western Chinese grasslands," 2008 Conference (52nd), February 5-8, 2008, Canberra, Australia 6019, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    18. Moore, A.D. & Robertson, M.J. & Routley, R., 2011. "Evaluation of the water use efficiency of alternative farm practices at a range of spatial and temporal scales: A conceptual framework and a modelling approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 162-174, February.
    19. McPhee, Malcolm J. & Evered, Mark & Andrews, Todd & Pacheco, David & Dougherty, Holland C. & Ingham, Aaron B. & Harden, Steven & Crean, Jason & Roche, Leslie & Eastburn, Danny J. & Oltjen, James W. & , 2019. "Beef production simulation of nitrate and lipid supplements for pasture and rangeland fed enterprises," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 19-27.
    20. Ghahramani, Afshin & Moore, Andrew D., 2015. "Systemic adaptations to climate change in southern Australian grasslands and livestock: Production, profitability, methane emission and ecosystem function," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 158-166.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Farm Management;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:afbmau:121464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afbmnea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.