IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aareaj/117380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Elegy, ode, or panegyric? Practising agricultural economics in Australia, 1975-99

Author

Listed:
  • Godden, David P.

Abstract

Changes are investigated in the Australian agricultural economics profession, 1975–99, using a conventional microeconomics framework of supply and demand for agricultural economists. Aggregate exogenous factors such as changes in the agricultural and tertiary education sectors, and changes in beliefs about the proper role of government, have changed both supply and demand conditions for agricultural economists. The profession has responded by shifting its focus away from narrowly agricultural policy, especially marketing policy, towards areas of market failure such as environmental and natural resource issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Godden, David P., 2001. "Elegy, ode, or panegyric? Practising agricultural economics in Australia, 1975-99," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 45(1), pages 1-33.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aareaj:117380
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.117380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/117380/files/1467-8489.00132.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.117380?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Freebairn, John W., 1985. "Professional Interfaces and Impact of the Profession," Agricultural Economics in Australia 234999, University of New England (Australia).
    2. R.G. Gregory, 1979. "Some Implications Of Growth In The Mineral Sector: Errata," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 23(1), pages 73-73, April.
    3. Bearman, S., 1985. "Agricultural Economics in Australia," Agricultural Economics in Australia 234886, University of New England (Australia).
    4. Phillips, John, 1975. "Forum - A Subjective Evaluation Of Resource Allocation Within Agricultural Economics Research: 1958-73," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 43(01), pages 1-5, March.
    5. Godden, David P., 2000. "Elegy, ode or panegyric: Australian agricultural economics in the last quarter of the twentieth century," 2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia 123652, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    6. Tacconi, Luca, 1998. "Scientific methodology for ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 91-105, October.
    7. Standen, Bruce J., 1985. "A Future View from Professional Practice," Agricultural Economics in Australia 235000, University of New England (Australia).
    8. McCloskey, Donald N, 1983. "The Rhetoric of Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 21(2), pages 481-517, June.
    9. Unknown, 1999. "Impact of Competition Policy Reforms on Rural and Regional Australia," Inquiry Reports 31892, Productivity Commission.
    10. N.H. Sturgess, 1993. "Some Thoughts On Competency Standards," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 37(2), pages 67-78, August.
    11. Roland Hoksbergen, 1994. "Postmodernism and Institutionalism: Toward a Resolution of the Debate on Relativism," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 679-713, September.
    12. Ahmadi-Esfahani, Fredoun Z. & Brakey, John, 1996. "The Industrial Organisation of the Australian Agricultural Economics Society," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(02), pages 1-19, August.
    13. Alan Randall, 1993. "What Practicing Agricultural Economists Really Need to Know about Methodology," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 75(Special_I), pages 48-59.
    14. Anderson, Jock R., 1985. "Agricultural Economics in Australia: Perspectives from Academe," Agricultural Economics in Australia 235067, University of New England (Australia).
    15. Gellatly, Colin C., 1985. "Agricultural Economics in the State Government Sector," Agricultural Economics in Australia 234893, University of New England (Australia).
    16. Miller, Geoff L., 1985. "Agricultural Economics in Canberra," Agricultural Economics in Australia 234894, University of New England (Australia).
    17. Sturgess, Neil H., 1993. "Some Thoughts on Competency Standards," 1993 Conference (37th), February 9-11, 1993, Sydney, Australia 147405, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Godden, David P., 2000. "Elegy, ode or panegyric: Australian agricultural economics in the last quarter of the twentieth century," 2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia 123652, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    2. Spash, Clive L., 2012. "Ecological Economics and Philosophy of Science: Ontology, Epistemology, Methodology and Ideology," SRE-Discussion Papers 2012/03, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    3. Mullen, John D., 1996. "Why Economists and Scientists Find Cooperation Costly," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(02), pages 1-9, August.
    4. Clive L. Spash, 2012. "Towards the Integration of Social, Economic and Ecological Knowledge," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Julien-François Gerber & Rolf Steppacher (ed.), Towards an Integrated Paradigm in Heterodox Economics, chapter 1, pages 26-46, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Ahmadi-Esfahani, Fredoun Z. & Brakey, John, 1995. "The Political Economy of the Australian Agricultural Economics Society: Implications for Future Directions," 1995 Conference (39th), February 14-16, 1995, Perth, Australia 148805, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    6. Mark Tomass, 2001. "Incommensurability of Economic Paradigms: A case study of the monetary theories of Mises and Marx," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 221-243.
    7. MacAulay, T. Gordon, 1995. "Games, Clubs And Models: The Economics Of An Agricultural Economics Society," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 39(1), pages 1-23, April.
    8. Spash, Clive L., 2012. "New foundations for ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 36-47.
    9. Robert Garnett, 2011. "Why should Austrian economists be pluralists?," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 24(1), pages 29-42, March.
    10. Meppem, Tony & Bourke, Simon, 1999. "Different ways of knowing: a communicative turn toward sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 389-404, September.
    11. Runge, C. Ford, 2006. "Agricultural Economics: A Brief Intellectual History," Staff Papers 13649, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    12. Ahmadi-Esfahani, Fredoun Z. & Brakey, John, 1996. "The Industrial Organisation of the Australian Agricultural Economics Society," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(02), pages 1-19, August.
    13. John Quiggin, 2006. "Stories about productivity," Australian Public Policy Program Working Papers WP4P06, Risk and Sustainable Management Group, University of Queensland.
    14. Wilfred Dolfsma, 2001. "Economists as subjects: Toward a psychology of economists," Forum for Social Economics, Springer;The Association for Social Economics, vol. 30(2), pages 77-88, March.
    15. Petrick, Martin, 2004. "Can Econometric Analysis Make (Agricultural) Economics A Hard Science? Critical Remarks And Implications For Economic Methodology," IAMO Discussion Papers 14911, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    16. J. Kornai., 2002. "The System Paradigm," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, vol. 4.
    17. Suzuki, Tomo, 2003. "The accounting figuration of business statistics as a foundation for the spread of economic ideas," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 65-95, January.
    18. Raymond E. Lombra, 1992. "Understanding the Remarkable Survival of Multiplier Models of Money Stock Determination," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 18(3), pages 305-314, Summer.
    19. Weichselbaumer, Doris & Winter-Ebmer, Rudolf, 2003. "Rhetoric in Economic Research: The Case of Gender Wage Differentials," Economics Series 144, Institute for Advanced Studies.
    20. Shi, Tian & Adamson, David, 2006. "Book Reviews," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(3), pages 1-6, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aareaj:117380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.