IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aareaj/116189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Greenhouse gas and groundwater recharge abatement benefits of tree crops in southwestern Australian farming systems

Author

Listed:
  • Petersen, Elizabeth H.
  • Schilizzi, Steven
  • Bennett, David

Abstract

The indirect benefits of a commercial tree crop for greenhouse gas and groundwater recharge abatement are analysed. Oil mallees are introduced into a whole-farm linear programming model as a source of income, an offset to greenhouse gas emissions from the mixed sheep and cropping enterprises and as a source of groundwater recharge abatement. The profitability of oil mallees is found to be very sensitive to the discount rate, yield and price assumptions and the relative profitability of other farm enterprises (especially the wool enterprise). Under standard assumptions where oil mallees are profitable, the trees significantly reduced greenhouse gas emissions and groundwater recharge and the farm remains profitable. If farm-level policies are introduced for greenhouse gas abatement, without tree crops or some other technological change, the current farming systems would fail and be replaced by alternative land uses.

Suggested Citation

  • Petersen, Elizabeth H. & Schilizzi, Steven & Bennett, David, 2003. "Greenhouse gas and groundwater recharge abatement benefits of tree crops in southwestern Australian farming systems," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 47(2), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aareaj:116189
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.116189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/116189/files/1467-8489.00210.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.116189?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adil Najam & Atiq A. Rahman & Saleemul Huq & Youba Sokona, 2003. "Integrating sustainable development into the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(sup1), pages 9-17, November.
    2. Schilizzi, S. G. M. & Kingwell, R. S., 1999. "Effects of climatic and price uncertainty on the value of legume crops in a Mediterranean-type environment," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 55-69, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thamo, Tas & Addai, Donkor & Kragt, Marit E. & Kingwell, Ross S. & Pannell, David J. & Robertson, Michael J., 2019. "Climate change reduces the mitigation obtainable from sequestration in an Australian farming system," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(4), October.
    2. Alford, Andrew & Garcia, S.C. & Farina, Santiago & Fulkerson, Bill, 2009. "An Economic Evaluation of the FutureDairy Complementary Forage Rotation System - Using Cost Budgeting," Research Reports 280786, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chukwumerije Okereke, 2017. "A six-component model for assessing procedural fairness in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 145(3), pages 509-522, December.
    2. Subbarao, Srikanth & Lloyd, Bob, 2011. "Can the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) deliver?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1600-1611, March.
    3. Pardo Martínez, Clara Inés, 2015. "Energy and sustainable development in cities: A case study of Bogotá," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P3), pages 612-621.
    4. A. Ogden & J. Innes, 2008. "Climate change adaptation and regional forest planning in southern Yukon, Canada," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 13(8), pages 833-861, October.
    5. Ahumada, Omar & Villalobos, J. Rene, 2009. "Application of planning models in the agri-food supply chain: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Ken-Ichi Akao, 2011. "Optimum forest program when the carbon sequestration service of a forest has value," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 13(4), pages 323-343, December.
    7. John Cole, 2012. "Genesis of the CDM: the original policymaking goals of the 1997 Brazilian proposal and their evolution in the Kyoto protocol negotiations into the CDM," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 41-61, March.
    8. Reis, Silvia Araújo & Leal, José Eugenio, 2015. "A deterministic mathematical model to support temporal and spatial decisions of the soybean supply chain," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 48-58.
    9. Elizabeth Petersen & Steven Schilizzi & David Bennett, 2003. "Greenhouse gas and groundwater recharge abatement benefits of tree crops in south‐western Australian farming systems," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 47(2), pages 211-231, June.
    10. Harald Winkler & Anya Boyd & Marta Torres Gunfaus & Stefan Raubenheimer, 2015. "Reconsidering development by reflecting on climate change," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 369-385, November.
    11. Tan, Barış & Çömden, Nihan, 2012. "Agricultural planning of annual plants under demand, maturation, harvest, and yield risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 539-549.
    12. Andreas Bjurström & Merritt Polk, 2011. "Physical and economic bias in climate change research: a scientometric study of IPCC Third Assessment Report," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 108(1), pages 1-22, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Resource /Energy Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aareaj:116189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.