IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/infoec/v15y2011i4p96-109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing APT Model upon a BVB Stocks’ Portfolio

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra BONTAÅž
  • Ioan ODAGESCU

Abstract

Applying the Arbitrage Pricing Theory model (APT), there can be identified the major factors of influence for a BVB’ portfolio stocks’ trend. There were taken into consideration two of the APT theory models, establishing influences upon portfolio’s yield: given to macroeconomic environment and to some stochastic factors. The research’s results certify that, on the long term, what influences the stocks’ movement in the stock market is mostly the action of specific short-term factors, without general covering, like the ones that are classified in the research area of behavioral finance (investors’ preference towards risk and towards time).

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra BONTAÅž & Ioan ODAGESCU, 2011. "Testing APT Model upon a BVB Stocks’ Portfolio," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(4), pages 96-109.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:15:y:2011:i:4:p:96-109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.revistaie.ase.ro/content/60/07%20-%20Bontas,%20Odagescu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glosten, Lawrence R & Jagannathan, Ravi & Runkle, David E, 1993. "On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 48(5), pages 1779-1801, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chang, Hao-Wen & Chang, Tsangyao & Lee, Chien-Chiang, 2023. "Return and volatility connectedness among the BRICS stock and oil markets," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    2. Madhusudan Karmakar, 2007. "Asymmetric Volatility and Risk-return Relationship in the Indian Stock Market," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 8(1), pages 99-116, January.
    3. Li, Longqing, 2017. "A Comparative Study of GARCH and EVT Model in Modeling Value-at-Risk," MPRA Paper 85645, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Fuentes Vélez, Mariana & Pinilla Barrera, Alejandro, 2021. "Transmisión de volatilidad en el Mercado Integrado Latinoamericano (MILA): una evidencia del grado de integración. || Transmission of volatility in the Latin American Integrated Market (MILA): evidenc," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 31(1), pages 301-328, June.
    5. Naifar, Nader & Hammoudeh, Shawkat & Al dohaiman, Mohamed S., 2016. "Dependence structure between sukuk (Islamic bonds) and stock market conditions: An empirical analysis with Archimedean copulas," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 148-165.
    6. Rui Luo & Weinan Zhang & Xiaojun Xu & Jun Wang, 2017. "A Neural Stochastic Volatility Model," Papers 1712.00504, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2018.
    7. Diether Beuermann & Antonios Antoniou & Alejandro Bernales, 2005. "The Dynamics of the Short-Term Interest Rate in the UK," Finance 0512029, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Beatriz Mota Aragón, 2011. "Capital Investments and Real Options: New Proposals," Revista de Administración, Finanzas y Economía (Journal of Management, Finance and Economics), Tecnológico de Monterrey, Campus Ciudad de México, vol. 5(1), pages 65-76.
    9. Yiguo Sun & Ximing Wu, 2018. "Leverage and Volatility Feedback Effects and Conditional Dependence Index: A Nonparametric Study," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, June.
    10. Lisa A. Kramer & Mark J. Kamstra & Maurice D. Levi, 2000. "Losing Sleep at the Market: The Daylight Saving Anomaly," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 90(4), pages 1005-1011, September.
    11. Kamal, Javed Bin & Hassan, M. Kabir, 2022. "Asymmetric connectedness between cryptocurrency environment attention index and green assets," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    12. Hasan, Amena & Dowla, Asif-Ud & Tarannum, Ramisa, 2024. "Financial Inclusion and Economic Growth in Developing Nations: A Case Study of Bangladesh," MPRA Paper 120213, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 08 Feb 2024.
    13. Kuan, Chung-Ming & Yeh, Jin-Huei & Hsu, Yu-Chin, 2009. "Assessing value at risk with CARE, the Conditional Autoregressive Expectile models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 150(2), pages 261-270, June.
    14. Takaishi, Tetsuya, 2018. "Bias correction in the realized stochastic volatility model for daily volatility on the Tokyo Stock Exchange," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 500(C), pages 139-154.
    15. Han, Chulwoo & Park, Frank C., 2022. "A geometric framework for covariance dynamics," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    16. Robert F. Engle & Joshua V. Rosenberg, 1995. "GARCH Gamma," NBER Working Papers 5128, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. George Filis & Christos Floros & Bruno Eeckels, 2011. "Option listing, returns and volatility: evidence from Greece," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(19), pages 1423-1435.
    18. Jiawei Du, 2020. "A Research on Cross-sectional Return Dispersion and Volatility of US Stock Market during COVID-19," Papers 2007.11546, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2021.
    19. Yaya, OlaOluwa & Ogbonna, Ahamuefula, 2018. "Modelling crude oil-petroleum products’ price nexus using dynamic conditional correlation GARCH models," MPRA Paper 91227, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Eric Benhamou & David Saltiel & Serge Tabachnik & Sui Kai Wong & François Chareyron, 2021. "Distinguish the indistinguishable: a Deep Reinforcement Learning approach for volatility targeting models," Working Papers hal-03202431, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Portfolio; Risk; Stocks; Yield; Testing;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:15:y:2011:i:4:p:96-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Paul Pocatilu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.