IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/infoec/v14y2010i3p34-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Audit Process during Projects for Development of New Mobile IT Application

Author

Listed:
  • Marius POPA

Abstract

This paper presents characteristics of the computer audit process during software development life cycle focused on specific aspects of the mobile IT applications. There are highlighted specific features of the distributed informatics systems implemented in wireless environments as hardware components, wireless technologies, classes of wireless systems, specialized software for mobile IT applications, quality characteristics of the mobile IT applications, software development models and their specific stages and issues aspects of the computer audit during software development life cycle of the distributed informatics systems customized on mobile IT applications. In the computer audit process, tasks of the computer auditors and what controls they must implement are also presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Marius POPA, 2010. "Audit Process during Projects for Development of New Mobile IT Application," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(3), pages 34-46.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:14:y:2010:i:3:p:34-46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revistaie.ase.ro/content/55/1003%20-%20Marius%20Popa.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marius POPA & Sergiu Marin CAPISIZU, 2010. "Using Quantitative Methods as Support for Audit of the Distributed Informatics Systems," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 103-112.
    2. Marius POPA & Cristian TOMA & Cristian AMANCEI, 2009. "Characteristics of the Audit Processes for Distributed Informatics Systems," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(3), pages 165-178.
    3. Marius POPA & Mihai DOINEA, 2007. "Audit Characteristics for Information System Security," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 0(4), pages 103-106.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marius POPA, 2011. "Techniques and Methods to Improve the Audit Process of the Distributed Informatics Systems Based on Metric System," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(2), pages 69-78.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristian CIUREA, 2010. "The Informatics Audit - A Collaborative Process," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 119-127.
    2. Marius POPA, 2011. "Framework for Evaluation of the IT&C Audit Metrics Impact," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(4), pages 119-133.
    3. Marius POPA, 2011. "Techniques and Methods to Improve the Audit Process of the Distributed Informatics Systems Based on Metric System," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(2), pages 69-78.
    4. Ion IVAN & Claudiu BRANDAS & Alin ZAMFIROIU, 2015. "Audit Validation Using Ontologies," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(2), pages 25-33.
    5. Marius POPA & Sergiu Marin CAPISIZU, 2010. "Using Quantitative Methods as Support for Audit of the Distributed Informatics Systems," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 103-112.
    6. Gabriel Eugen Garais, 2012. "Maintenance Processes Evaluation For Distributed Applications," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 6(2), pages 378-388, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:14:y:2010:i:3:p:34-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Paul Pocatilu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.